Skip to main content

Letter to the Supporters of Francis & Vatican II

St. Catherine of Sienna's first letter to Pope Gregory XI:

"Oh, sweet and true knowledge... if he loves himself for his own sake and not for God - he cannot do other than ill, and all virtue is dead in him. Such a one is like a woman who brings forth her sons dead."
(The Letters of Saint Catherine of Sienna,  page 86)

This letter seems to be speaking to the Vatican II school of the Nouvelle Theologie (New Theology) which is apparently central in Francis's thinking.

This theology's emphasize appears to" substitut[e]... man's becoming for God's being."


Francis says Cardinal Walter Kasper is "profound." The National Catholic Reporter called Kasper "the 'pope's [Francis's] theologian.'" His theology is one extreme example of this school of thought.


Kasper appears to not believe in being, but only in becoming because of his Hegelian philosophy.


The philosopher Thomas Stark said that one of Kasper's central beliefs is "historical process," that is man's historical becoming or change.


Remember that Francis's two favorite words are process and change.


In "German Idealism and Cardinal Kasper's Theological Project" for The Catholic World Report, Stark wrote:


"Kasper's...'spirit' that--Kasper himself says--is not identical to the third divine person, but is much more reminiscent of Hegel's absolute spirit, who in a historical process, synthesizing it's dialectical opposites in itself, develops into the whole."


Speaking of the less heretical theologians than Kasper and his disciple Francis who were members of Nouvelle theologie who believe in process or becoming and the dangers of this thinking, Fr. James McLucas, the former editor of the Latin Mass magazine, in a lecture said:


"It appears to emphasis the Person of Jesus, the Person of the Holy Spirit and the Person of the Father and the personal manner of each individual's sanctification as being created in the image of God."


"But here is the key. This is all true.We certainly need this emphasis. But personhood if it is not fully subjected to being and the objective nature of God, then personhood becomes often the vehicle for the substitution of man's becoming for God's being."


If one substitutes man's becoming for God's being then man is becoming nothing. Here is why:


If one believes in being, one believes a thing is a thing.


God is the fullness or total actuality of all things or being and is their creator. Our purpose or goal in life to go to God.


God is not a Kasperian "historical process" or change.


If one believes only in becoming without being, one believes nothing is becoming nothing or death.


G. K. Chesterton put it best:


"Most thinkers on realizing the apparent mutablility of being, have really forgotten their own realization of the being and believe only in the mutablility...It is only change."


"It would be more logical to call it nothing changing into nothing than to say (on this principles) that there ever was a moment when the thing was itself. St. Thomas maintains that the ordinary thing at any moment is something, but it is not everything it could be...While they describe a change which is really a change in nothing, he describes a changelessness which includes the change of everything."


"Things change because they are not complete, but their reality can only be explained as part of something that is complete. It is God." (The Dumb Ox)

If man goes to God who is Being Itseft then he receives the gifts of grace, truth and eternal life.


If men like Kasper and his disciple Francis substitutes man's becoming or change over and against God's Being or Changelessness then he gets nothing and eternal death.

The question needs to be asked since Francis's favorite word is change remembering what Chesterton said "it would be more logical to say it is nothing changing into nothing" which is what one gets if one is a disciple of Kasper:


Does Francis believe in nothing and eternal death according to G. K. Chesterton?


Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of the Mary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Flashback: The Truth: "It's Not Just Fraud; It's Treason" by the Propaganda Media, the Democrats and those Complicit in the Fraud

November 30, 2020  NewsMax TV host Greg Kelly explained best what the massive 2020 presidential voter fraud and lying as well as gaslighting of the " Media, Judges, 'Experts' all 'Nothing to See Here, Folks, Move along'" means to you, your family and the United States: Greg Kelly @gregkellyusa The SYSTEM trying to RAILROAD @realDonaldTrump OUT OF OFFICE. The Media, Judges, “Experts” all “Nothing to See Here, Folks, Move along” —They have NO respect for US. IF they can pull this FRAUD with a President, think of what they can do to YOU. NOT OVER. NO WAY. [https://twitter.com/gregkellyusa/status/1333044311978618881 and https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/gateway-pundit-videos-first-time-in.html] -Catholic Monitor "H older of 4 degrees from MIT Ph.D. Dr. Shiva Ayvadurai, the inventor of the email, at the Arizona state voter fraud public hearing " presented his data at the Arizona hearing, showing the only way for Joe Biden to hav...

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

Was Bergoglio Chosen?: CIA Pope - "The Real Mover and Shaker of this Entire Spectacle is the Deep State"

U.S. Deep State Pope And Its Implications For You By Laramie Hirsch The U.S. State Department routinely pressures members of the United Security Council with a view to influencing the vote pertaining to Security Council resolutions. U.S. covert operations and propaganda campaigns are routinely applied with a view to influencing national elections in different countries around the world. Similarly, the CIA has a longstanding covert relationship with the Vatican. Did the U.S. government attempt to influence the outcome of the election of the new pontiff? Firmly committed to serving U.S. foreign policy interests in Latin America, Jorge Mario Bergoglio was Washington’s preferred candidate. Were undercover pressures discretely exerted by Washington, within the Catholic Church, directly or indirectly, on the 115 cardinals who are members of the Vatican conclave? Professor Michel Chossudovsky,  “Washington’s Pope”? Who is Pope Francis I? Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio and Argentina’s “Dir...