Skip to main content

Is "Bergoglio... a... Tyrannical Narcissist who... Confirm[ed] himself as the Supreme Arbiter of Reality"?

Catholic Monitor commenter MEwbank gave the following insights on a Monitor post:

You have given an overview of a remarkable number of threads that run through the fabric woven during the last century or so out of influences from anterior eras, all leading to the current supremacy of perspectivism or relativism in the Church.

Bergoglio is an exemplary representative of all these currents, not that he is brilliant and profound, as Austen Ivereigh alleges. He has no capacity to articulate the theoretical principles or lack thereof grounding these doctrines.

Rather, Bergoglio is patently a pathologically warped tyrannical narcissist who has long sought out these sources to confirm himself as the supreme arbiter of reality.

The underlying irony of all relativisms and postulating that one's arbitrary dialectical holding of selectively interpreted polarities in tension is that such is ultimately contradictory.

After all, the supposed ultimate Demiurge (in this case it is Bergoglio endeavoring to make the Church into what he believes it should be, which is merged with globalist ideological secularism and its false humanism) or Superman orchestrating these moral and political oppositions, which he would insist are mere shallow appearances, must presume that he possesses unqualified truth concerning the being of things.

And the one truth he presumes to possess reduces by sheer volition all truth and truths to continual flux and becoming.

This is the ultimate basis for subsuming of all theory and enduring truth into praxis, of truth into ever fleeting feeling and ongoing action.

All is process, and no essential identities or truths can supposedly be validly acknowledged as enduring or constant.

But this is a metaphysical lie.
[http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2019/11/is-francis-nihilistic-total-relativist.html]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


Pray an Our Father now to offer reparation for the offenses against the Sacred Heart of Jesus, the Immaculate Heart of Mary and for the conversion of sinners.


Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
the most fitting punishment for a college of Cardinals which wanted to run the Church and get rid of the Vicar of Christ would be to have a fake pope like Bergoglio who wants to be the arbiter of their reality. It is Divine justice. Bergoglio is the demon they have invoked upon themselves.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk