Is One-World Government Francis attempting to the Steal the Amazon from Brazil?

In section 5 of Querida Amazonia Francis apparently said the Amazon belonged him and the whole world:

"[T]hat land [the Amazon] which is also 'ours.'"

Is he implying that a one-world government should steal the Amazon from Brazil?

Might Francis be the new Al Gore?

Vatican News reported that doomsday global warming alarmist Al Gore "praised Pope Francis' encyclical, 'Laudato si'" saying it addressed the "climate crisis ahead of the [United Nations' global warming] Paris Agreement."
(Vatican News, "Al Gore: Pope Francis a 'moral force' for solving climate crisis, July 4, 2018)

The Week in a 2018 headline proclaimed "How Pope Francis became the new Al Gore."

Francis in Laudato si (161) did become "the new Al Gore" doomsday global warming alarmist saying of climate warming:

"Doomsday predictions can no longer be met with... disdain."

It, also, appears that Francis may be "the new Al Gore" with his Amazon Synod which could be a globalist attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil.

The New York Times reported Gore inferring the possibility of a United Nations globalist attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil:

"Contrary to what Brazilians think, the Amazon is not their property, it belongs to all of us."
(The New York Times, "Whose Rain Forest is This, Anyway," May 18, 2008)

Francis in Laudato si (174-175) apparently backed Gore's inference of some type of globalist organization attempt to steal the Amazon by "imposing sanctions":

"[A]n agreement on systems of governance for the whole range of so-called 'global commons'... to devise stronger and more efficient international institutions... Empowered to impose sanctions."

This is exactly what was happening when the globalist's G-7 led by French President Emmanuel Macron according to the Internationalist which revealed the Amazon fires has brought about an "attempt[ed] internationalization of the Amazon."

Brazil President Jair Bolsonaro according to the Internationalist responded to this apparent attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil by accusing Marcon of "'having a colonialist mentality' which 'instrumentalises an internal issue of Brazil and other Amazonian countries' with 'a sensationalist tone that does nothing to solve the problem".
(Internationalist, "The G-7 Exploits Fires to Attempt Internationalization of the Amazon," August 26, 2019)

Remember that Francis said the Amazon Synod is the "child" of Laudato si which wants "systems of governance" for "'global commons'" such as Brazil's Amazon.

Is the Francis Amazon Synod part of an attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil?

If the "international institutions" are able to "internationalize" the "global common" of Brazil's Amazon where does it stop.

Do "systems of governance" for "'global commons'" ultimately end in a one-world government with the excuse of the doomsday myth of global warming?

(And, maybe, another excuse for internationalizing the Amazon might, also, include giving it to the control of the governance of the indigenous who can more easily be bought out by the one-world government advocates than the Brazilian nation.)

Remember that the New American wrote:

"Francis... claiming that planetary problems are exacerbated by 'an excessive demand for sovereignty on the part of States'... make room for 'international organizations' to develop into governing bodies, supplanting the 'state interests.'"
(The New American, "Pope Francis calls for end of Sovereignty and Establishment of Global Government," May 9, 2019)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ? On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace. The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

The Catholic Monitor

Search This Blog