Skip to main content

Is Bp. Schneider a "Flying Monkey" or another Type of Enabler?

Is Bishop Athanasius Schneider an enabler of Francis?

If he is then what type of enabler might he be?

The literature on narcissist enablers claims there are types of enablers:

"Narcissism does not exist in a vacuum. It can't. Therefore, there are enablers... who support the narcissist... people the narcissist recruits to their side. These people are usually called 'flying monkeys,' but there are other types of enablers, too."

"These are the people who might not agree with or defend the narcissist, but who enable the narcissist... who says things like, 'She's [he's] your mother [pope]'... 'How can you abandon your husband [pope]'... 'I give in to your sister [pope] to keep the peace.'"

"... If one spouse hits the other, and the assaulted spouse does not leave the relationship or call the police, they've taught the batterer that this behavior is acceptable because there have been no consequences."
(Pairedlife.com, "The Narcissist's Enablers," June 17, 2019)

Bishop Schneider appears to be the second type of enabler as are all Francis traditionalists.

Schneider and all Francis traditionalists don't agree with Francis on pachamama idolatry, diversity of religions, Communion for adulterers and the betrayal of the Chinese underground Church, but he and they enable Francis to keep doing these blasphemies against God and battering faithful Catholics.

Moreover, Schneider the Enabler and all the Francis traditionalists will never stop defending Francis's "papal right" to keep committing blasphemies against God and battering faithful Catholics black and blue such as in China because "he's our pope" and "we must keep the peace and not have schism" despite the blasphemies and batterings.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Islam_Is_Islam said…
Thank you, Mr Martinez. You explain the grounds of my visceral reaction.

The faithful are not called to be black-and-blue doormats who enable destruction by compromising with deceit.
3:12 PM
Fred Martinez said…
Thank you, Islam is Islam,

You are always a great commenter.

Thanks also for your kind words on the podcast post. Please pray that God shows me His will on that and that I by His grace do it.

Sorry that I didn't answer then but I didn't know about until sometime later when a friend told me.
5:11 PM
Christina said…
Something that I have found disturbing lately - the attacks by good traditional Catholics on other good traditional Catholics because of differences of opinion on whether Bergoglio is a legitimate pope or not. Surely we shouldn't be questioning the motives of others and we ought only to be concentrating on standing up for Holy Mother Church.
10:25 AM
Islam_Is_Islam said…
@Christina: And requesting an inquest into the corruption in the Vatican despite what prelates like Bp Schneider and Cdl Burke say, right? That's what you mean when you say that we should stand up for Holy Mother Church, right?
12:39 PM
A D Ryan said…
i worry that we are being asked to accept Pope francis as legitimate in spite of all the clear evidence that he does not love Jesus or the church
3:51 AM
St. Benedict's Thistle said…
Please pray about how you respond to this situation.

Standing up for the Church means rooting out and exposing the improper motives that are harming her, which may range from the love of money to outright freemasonry.

Evil must be exposed in order to be expunged. It is sometimes very ugly, but the surgeon wounds in order to heal, as the saying goes.
8:08 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more