Skip to main content

Why is Where Peter Is spreading Propaganda against De Oliveira?

Recently, the Pachamama apologist website Where Peter Is, which I call Where Pachamama Is, has been implying that the great Catholic Brazilian scholar Plinio Correa de Oliveira was a fascist.

The racist National Socialist pro-abortion Nazis as well as the pro-abortion Socialists and Communists are all statist which the scholar unconditionally condemned.

The liberal Pachamama apologist website which along with their beloved Francis apparently wants to empower the pro-abortion Democrats and their Socialist collaborators around the globe such as in Argentina who are all statist which are all condemned by the Brazilian.

Tradition, Family and Property founder de Oliveira's actual writings show that the liberal statist Pachamama website is a propaganda website which is idealogically closer to Fascism than they want people to know.

The Brazilian scholar wrote:

"Whoever exaggerates the role of the State will necessarily be a socialist, whatever the mask he tries to cover his face with... Catholics should be anticommunist, anti-Nazi, anti-liberal, anti-socialist, anti-masonic, ect... simply because they are Catholics."
(Crusader of the 20th Century: Plinio Correa de Oliveira, by Roberto de Mattei, Page 51)

Moreover, de Oliveira witnessed the ideological closeness of the Fascist National Socialist Party of the Nazis and the Russian Communists as well as their follow travellers in their collaboration of the partition of Poland. He wrote:

"[T]he close ideological proximity between Nazism and communism, translated into a positive military alliance... to impose on Europe a lord who is the antithesis of Catholic civilization."
(Ibid, Page 58-59)

Renowned historian Roberto de Mattei in his book on de Oliveira shows us that the Catholic politicians of that time are just like the liberal Where Peter Is and it's beloved Francis in our time:

"Plinio Correa de Oliveira always admired the figure of Churchill, a Protestant, but strong in character and steadfast in his ideas, while the common trait of the Catholic politicians of the time seemed to be willingness to 'compromise' and to collaborate with the enemy."
(Ibid, Page 59)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk