Skip to main content

Cdl. Zen: Francis's Vatican China "Pastoral Document" has "Turned Upside... What is Rightful" or put Simply Francis's Vatican "Document" is Evil

LifeSiteNews reported that Cardinal Joseph Zen said that Francis's Vatican's newest "pastoral document" has "turned upside... what is rightful."

Zen said the document "is obviously against all fundament[al] moral theology! If valid, [it] would justify even apostasy!"
(LifeSiteNews, "Cld. Zen tells Pope Francis that Vatican's new pastoral doc China justifies 'apostasy,'" July, 5 2019)

What Cld. Zen in saying the document is not "rightful" and "against all... moral theology" is saying is that the Francis Vatican document is morally wrong or more accurately it is morally evil.

The document in simple terms is giving "reasons" or justifying "apostasy" from the Catholic faith for underground "priests to register" with the totalitarian oppressive atheistic Communist regime that will use this to bring about the "death" of the underground Chinese Church.

Zen said:

"Those [Francis's Vatican] who wrote it [the "pastoral document"] hope perhaps that the pitied minority [the Chinese underground Catholic Church] will die a natural death."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Comments

Aqua said…
It is impossible for a valid Pope, directed and protected by God, to promulgate an Evil Pastoral Document, and to willingly betray an entire nation’s Church to apostasy and evil.

It is a sin, a great sin, for Catholics to fail to recognize this and to not do something about it - internally first; with action, second.

To blithely accept betrayals on this scale, and to defend the antipope’s validity and authority who is behind them is a great sin.

The evidence is clear and overwhelming. This all began at a specific moment in time. The Papacy has been clearly altered. It has produced constant revolution. heresy, apostasy and sin ever since then.

Ignore that at your peril, and that of your brothers and sisters who suffer.
6:13 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more