Skip to main content

Is the Pro-Gay "Asian Francis" Tagle who some say will be Francis II associated with Financial Corruption?

- Updated December 9, 2019

Philippine Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle is so in line with Francis's liberal agenda that he is called the "Asian Francis" and some are claiming he will be Francis II.

The pro-gay Tagle many believe is being groomed by the Francis Vatican to be the next pope.

Tagle was given the presidency of the pro-homosexual Caritas International after Francis's closest adviser and "vice pope" Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga stepped down from the office.
(Caritas.org, "Cardinal Tagle elected President of Caritas International")

Journalist Christine Niles reported that the Philippine Cardinal's organization is pro-gay:

"Caritas International... happens to be a member of the governing body of the World Social Forum - a Communist, pro-homosexual group."
(Church Militant, August 14, 2017)

According to the Catholic News Agency, Tagle "has a close relationship with" a "influential ecclesiastical figure in Guam" who is according a Vatican Insider article may have ties to "financial... scandals."
(Catholic News Agency, "Analysis: Gregory, Apuron, 'zero tolerance,' and pontifical secrets," April 4, 2019 and Vatican Insider La Stampa, "The Guam problem, a diocese rocked by financial and sexual scandal," 9/21/2017)

The Vatican Insider article reported that the Church figure was:

"Msgr. James Benavente... who boasts a close friendship with Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle... [the Cardinal is] subject of considerable criticism (and more than a little speculation) for some of his behaviors and especially for the luxury cars, houses (three acquired for himself)... first-class air travel, expensive restaurants and exclusive parties."

The article, moreover, says that there are "[h]eavy accusations against Monsignor Benevente" in which a "former secretary of the Finance Council of Guam Catholic Cemeteries" said:

"I have seen countless abuses of cemetery funds... Benavente also used $13,000 of the... funds to pay for the celebration of his 20th anniversary as a priest."

Now the story according to the Vatican Insider gets complicated as the now convicted gay pedophile Archbishop Anthony Apuron back then dismissed Benavente and also "dismissed [the allegedly gay] Father [Paul] Gofigan after having received complaints... the priest was living... with a former convict, Joseph Lastimoza... convicted of serious sexual crimes... [t]he removal of this priest, who was also the founder of the movement 'Rainbow Mercy' for young gay Catholics."

The article says Benavente "claimed to have important friendships within the FBI and powerful figures in the Vatican" and apparently he did.

It appears possible that Tagle with his close association to Francis may have gotten Francis to send Archbishop Savio Hon Tai-Fai as his personal representative to Guam to fix the situation.

The article says Archbishop Hon fixed the situation by doing the following:

"Benavente instead was given all previously held assignments with an added appointment for the Archdiocese's Patrimony" and "entrusted the cathedral to Fr. Paul Gofigan, who had been removed two years earlier."

It appears that the gay Archbishop Apuron is a unsavory character who should be laicized like the gay ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, but apparently, if the Vatican Insider article is credible, just as unsavory are the priests who were dismissed by him such as the allegedly gay priest and the close friend of the pro-gay Tagle who Francis appears to possibly be grooming to replace him.

If the Vatican Insider piece is true then it appears the events above are a cat fight in which all the unsavory characters involved are sleazy.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...