The Associated Press (AP) reported today:
"The Vatican is preparing the "necessary clarifications" about accusations that top Vatican officials including Pope Francis covered up the sexual misconduct of a now-disgraced American ex-cardinal, Francis' top advisers said Monday."
[https://www.yahoo.com/news/vatican-promises-clarifications-pope-cover-claims-161805683.html]
With the upcoming Vatican's Vigano "clarification" expect, if the pattern I chronicle below holds up, a “false flag” or fake news: planting of propaganda.
In other words expect: Lettergate 2.
The award winning The Intercept revealed that Pope Francis's Argentina knows all about “false flag” operations as done by British intelligence:
"While the full extent of JTRIG’s tactics used in the Falklands mission is unclear, the scope of JTRIG’s approved capabilities offers an idea of what may have been done. The group, first revealed last year by NBC News and The Intercept, has developed various techniques — including “false flag” operations, sexual “honey traps,” and implanting computer viruses — to collect intelligence, plant propaganda and diminish or discredit opponents."
"As reported in The Intercept last year, JTRIG “has developed covert tools to seed the internet with false information, including the ability to manipulate the results of online polls, artificially inflate pageview counts on web sites, ‘amplif[y]’ sanctioned messages on YouTube,” and plant false Facebook wall posts for “entire countries.” According to a study of the group by the U.K.’s Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL), “the language of JTRIG’s operations is characterized by terms such as ‘discredit,’ promote ‘distrust,’ ‘dissuade,’ ‘deceive,’ ‘disrupt,’ ‘delay,’ ‘deny,’ ‘denigrate/degrade,’ and ‘deter.’”"
[https://theintercept.com/2015/04/02/gchq-argentina-falklands/]
Here is a summary of the most famous of the Francis Vatican “false flag” or fake news operations: Lettergate 1.
Here is the pattern of some of the previous Francis Vatican “false flag” or fake news operations. Remember the key questions to ask are "Who is lying?"and "Why are they lying?":
In Barroslettergate or the Bishop Juan Barros sex abuse cover-up scandal, Francis said he had not received any evidence about the sex abuse case when a member of his inner circle of nine Cardinals and chief adviser on sex abuse personally deliver a letter of evidence to the Pope.
Who is lying and why?
In Lettergate, when the Letter came out all of the secular media, all of the leftist Catholic media and surprisingly the conservative Catholic media such as Life Site News as well as the traditional Catholic media such as the Remnant went along with the Francis Vatican's disinformation that Pope Benedict XVI was 100 percent behind Francis's failed papacy after reading 11 books on Francis's teachings.
Who is lying and why?
In Hellgate, the questions that needed to be asked is:
Who is lying?
Why are they lying?
Here is lawyer Christopher Ferrara's summary of Hellgate:
"This is the second time that Pope Francis, according to Scalfari, has professed the “annihilationist” heresy, the first being Scalfari’s interview of Francis in 2015. Even allowing for Scalfari’s self-admitted tendency to publish interviews with the Pope that are reconstructions rather than verbatim transcripts, the question remains: Is this in substance what the Pope said?"
"At this point, only one sort of denial will suffice: An unequivocal statement that Francis wishes it to be known that the words attributed to him by his friend are a total fabrication and that in no way, shape or form did Francis profess that there is no hell and that the souls of the damned are merely annihilated upon death."
What is the answer to all the above questions of: "Who is lying?" and "Why are they lying?"
The only possible ones who could be lying could be:
1. Francis
2. Francis's Vatican apparatus, closest friends, collaborators, confidants and inner circle.
Why were they lying?
The only possible answers are:
1. To falsely promote Francis.
2 To cover-up for Francis.
3. To protect themselves.
4. Either the old man is senile or lying or for the sake of the strange fun of saying an elderly man might continuously maybe be misquoting Francis and that is why the Pope keeps seeking him out, but maybe not since no unequivocal denial were ever made by Francis or his Vatican.
Next, Lettergate 2 is probably coming up if the pattern holds up.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.
"The Vatican is preparing the "necessary clarifications" about accusations that top Vatican officials including Pope Francis covered up the sexual misconduct of a now-disgraced American ex-cardinal, Francis' top advisers said Monday."
[https://www.yahoo.com/news/vatican-promises-clarifications-pope-cover-claims-161805683.html]
With the upcoming Vatican's Vigano "clarification" expect, if the pattern I chronicle below holds up, a “false flag” or fake news: planting of propaganda.
In other words expect: Lettergate 2.
The award winning The Intercept revealed that Pope Francis's Argentina knows all about “false flag” operations as done by British intelligence:
"While the full extent of JTRIG’s tactics used in the Falklands mission is unclear, the scope of JTRIG’s approved capabilities offers an idea of what may have been done. The group, first revealed last year by NBC News and The Intercept, has developed various techniques — including “false flag” operations, sexual “honey traps,” and implanting computer viruses — to collect intelligence, plant propaganda and diminish or discredit opponents."
"As reported in The Intercept last year, JTRIG “has developed covert tools to seed the internet with false information, including the ability to manipulate the results of online polls, artificially inflate pageview counts on web sites, ‘amplif[y]’ sanctioned messages on YouTube,” and plant false Facebook wall posts for “entire countries.” According to a study of the group by the U.K.’s Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL), “the language of JTRIG’s operations is characterized by terms such as ‘discredit,’ promote ‘distrust,’ ‘dissuade,’ ‘deceive,’ ‘disrupt,’ ‘delay,’ ‘deny,’ ‘denigrate/degrade,’ and ‘deter.’”"
[https://theintercept.com/2015/04/02/gchq-argentina-falklands/]
Here is a summary of the most famous of the Francis Vatican “false flag” or fake news operations: Lettergate 1.
When the Letter came out all of the secular media, all of the leftist Catholic media and surprisingly the conservative Catholic media such as Life Site News as well as the traditional Catholic media such as the Remnant went along with the Francis Vatican's disinformation that Pope Benedict XVI was 100 percent behind Francis's failed papacy after reading 11 books on Francis's teachings.
As soon as the letter came out the Catholic bloggers and Canon 212 immediately screamed in headlines that it was obviously fake news.
The headline at the Catholic Monitor was:
Benedict says Pope Francis is "Profound" Philosopher, has X-Ray Vision & can Leap Tall Buildings in a Single Bound
The Internet and Twitter was flooded with similar headlines and twits calling the Letter fake news and ridiculing the idea that Benedict called Francis profound.
Francis's Vatican, in the face of the Band of Bloggers ridiculing, blinked.
The seemingly all powerful Vatican media apparatus backed down, knuckled under, the Internet and Twitter confrontation of the Catholic blogger's ridicule of the Letter.
The next day, the Vatican in a attempt to show that the Letter wasn't fake admitted that Benedict hadn't read the 11 books, after that they admitted to manipulating the photo and finally the great Vatican expert Sandro Magister, through his sources, revealed that there were missing paragraphs which showed Benedict refused to endorse the books and was angry that the 11 books had heretical theologians who had attacked him and Pope John Paul Il's Vetitatis Splendor.
Anyone who has read Vetitatis Splendor knew that it condemns the teachings of Pope Francis's Amoris Laetitia.
The secular media and the Catholic media, after the facts started coming out, finally admitting the Band of Bloggers under the banner of Canon 212 were right.
They admitted that the Letter was fake news or a “false flag.”
Francis's Vatican, in the face of the Band of Bloggers ridiculing, blinked.
The seemingly all powerful Vatican media apparatus backed down, knuckled under, the Internet and Twitter confrontation of the Catholic blogger's ridicule of the Letter.
The next day, the Vatican in a attempt to show that the Letter wasn't fake admitted that Benedict hadn't read the 11 books, after that they admitted to manipulating the photo and finally the great Vatican expert Sandro Magister, through his sources, revealed that there were missing paragraphs which showed Benedict refused to endorse the books and was angry that the 11 books had heretical theologians who had attacked him and Pope John Paul Il's Vetitatis Splendor.
Anyone who has read Vetitatis Splendor knew that it condemns the teachings of Pope Francis's Amoris Laetitia.
The secular media and the Catholic media, after the facts started coming out, finally admitting the Band of Bloggers under the banner of Canon 212 were right.
They admitted that the Letter was fake news or a “false flag.”
The Francis Vatican's disinformation attempt to create the lie that there is no contradiction between Benedict and Francis's failed papacy was outed by the Band of Bloggers and Canon 212.
Here is the pattern of some of the previous Francis Vatican “false flag” or fake news operations. Remember the key questions to ask are "Who is lying?"and "Why are they lying?":
In Barroslettergate or the Bishop Juan Barros sex abuse cover-up scandal, Francis said he had not received any evidence about the sex abuse case when a member of his inner circle of nine Cardinals and chief adviser on sex abuse personally deliver a letter of evidence to the Pope.
Who is lying and why?
In Lettergate, when the Letter came out all of the secular media, all of the leftist Catholic media and surprisingly the conservative Catholic media such as Life Site News as well as the traditional Catholic media such as the Remnant went along with the Francis Vatican's disinformation that Pope Benedict XVI was 100 percent behind Francis's failed papacy after reading 11 books on Francis's teachings.
On the day the letter came out the Catholic bloggers and Canon 212 immediately screamed in headlines that it was obviously fake news and eventually it was outed as planted propaganda.
Who is lying and why?
In Hellgate, the questions that needed to be asked is:
Who is lying?
Why are they lying?
Here is lawyer Christopher Ferrara's summary of Hellgate:
"This is the second time that Pope Francis, according to Scalfari, has professed the “annihilationist” heresy, the first being Scalfari’s interview of Francis in 2015. Even allowing for Scalfari’s self-admitted tendency to publish interviews with the Pope that are reconstructions rather than verbatim transcripts, the question remains: Is this in substance what the Pope said?"
"At this point, only one sort of denial will suffice: An unequivocal statement that Francis wishes it to be known that the words attributed to him by his friend are a total fabrication and that in no way, shape or form did Francis profess that there is no hell and that the souls of the damned are merely annihilated upon death."
What is the answer to all the above questions of: "Who is lying?" and "Why are they lying?"
The only possible ones who could be lying could be:
1. Francis
2. Francis's Vatican apparatus, closest friends, collaborators, confidants and inner circle.
Why were they lying?
The only possible answers are:
1. To falsely promote Francis.
2 To cover-up for Francis.
3. To protect themselves.
4. Either the old man is senile or lying or for the sake of the strange fun of saying an elderly man might continuously maybe be misquoting Francis and that is why the Pope keeps seeking him out, but maybe not since no unequivocal denial were ever made by Francis or his Vatican.
Next, Lettergate 2 is probably coming up if the pattern holds up.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.
Comments