Skip to main content

When Chicken Littles Skojec & Moynihan cry "Schism" know we are Winning so Fight Harder

Updated: June 18, 2019

The phrase "canary in the coal mine" is a metaphor of "any warning of serious danger to come."

This means run and run fast out of the coal mine or whatever situation you're in because you are about to lose or be killed.

One Peter Five's publisher Steve Skojec has become a "anti-canary in the coal mine" for me. In simple words, if Skojec says run it means to me: stay and fight.

He said Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales, Cardinal Raymond Burke and the Open Letter were wrong in saying the Church can depose a heretical pope so run away from their teachings because they'll cause "schism."

That told me to fight harder than ever.

Skojec said Bishop René Gracida was wrong in presenting solid evidence of papal invalidity and calling for a Cardinal investigation into the validity of the Francis conclave and Benedict XVI resignation so run away from Gracida's teachings because they'll cause "schism."

That told me to fight harder than ever.

Today, Skojec said at his website "We are losing the war."

That told me we are winning the war.

Like with Chicken Little when he cried "The sky is falling" everyone was supposed to run scared, so with Skojec when he cries "schism" everyone is suppose to run away.

Skojec is my Trad anti-canary in the coal mine, but I, also, have a conservative anti-canary in the coal mine. He is Robert Moynihan.

Today, Moynihan, who I consider Francis's "conservative" mouthpiece in Rome, said in so many words in his Letter #31 "Battle, or dialogue" that Francis is losing the battle so "a dialogue process [needs] to begin" because "the current unease and simmering anger in the Catholic Church.... [could] lead to conflict, and even schism."

As the people of Venezuela now know when your dictator starts calling for dialogue don't dialogue, but fight harder than ever before he has time to reconsolidate his power in order keep you enslaved.

A few years ago, they were close to toppling the dictator, but Francis saved him by starting a dialogue process which allowed him to reconsolidate his totalitarian forces and he is still enslaving the country.

Now, apparently Francis may be in more trouble than we realized and his "conservative" mouthpiece in Rome is calling for "dialogue."

Thanks Skojec and Moynihan for letting us know that we are apparently winning the battle and even the war.

So, we need to fight harder than ever.

Just in case you think there is no evidence that Moynihan hasn't come to help Francis in the past and joined the secular media to help save Francis from resigning because of the now completely verified truth that Francis covered-up sex abuse then read about what happened in 2018 below.

By the way, back then he used the same Chicken Little cry as Skojec and he are using now:

"SCHISM!"

Remember, when you hear"schism" it means they are about to lose, so fight harder than ever. Remember that all the souls falling into sin and possibly into hell because of the teachings of Francis (especially adulterers receiving sacrilegious Communions) are depending on you, in the the grace of God, to fight for them as well as the Bride of Jesus Christ: the Church.

But, getting back to Moynihan, here is the past evidence of where his loyalty is:

Back in 2018, the leftist Daily Beast which was called a "Democratic party mouthpiece" on Quora.com apparently joined forces with the "conservative" Francis mouthpiece Inside the Vatican editor Robert Moynihan.

They appeared to be accomplices in Pope Francis's stonewalling against an investigation to bring out the truth of if he covered-up sex abuse as revealed by the credible Ex-Vatican Apostlic Nuncio Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano in a 11-page report.

The "Democratic party mouthpiece" Daily Beast's plot to enable Francis to cover-up the evidence that he protected sex abuse predator ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick was to change the narrative.

The Democratic party mouthpiece wants to change to story from: "Why is Francis stonewalling against revealing the evidence to prove or disprove the credible allegations of Vigano?" to the Daily Beast headline: "The Plot to bring down Pope Francis."

The Beast and Moynihan article narrative said the scandal isn't about the credibly alleged papal sex abuse cover-up, but about those bad "traditional conservatives":

"[T]he traditional conservatives... didn't want a cool... pope... they preferred the cold church... of immovable doctrines."

The Democratic party mouthpiece article quotes Moynihan saying:

"It... reveal[s] a profound struggle within the Catholic Church between factions... for "control of the narrative.'"

So for the "conservative" Francis mouthpiece Moynihan and the Beast it is about a Marxist-like dialectic of power struggles and "narratives" and must not be about what is the truth on rather the Pope covered-up sex abuse.

In fact, the truth doesn't matter so long as the "cool" pope wins in the power struggle with the bad "cold" conservatives.

As all Marxist leaning and apparently some "conservative" postmodernists know there is no such thing as truth only "narratives."

The truth of "cold... immoveable doctrines" or abuse cover-ups don't matter if one can use the "narratives" to help the "cool" leftist Pope beat the "cold" traditional conservatives.

Of course, the "narrative" to enable the Pope to stonewall revealing the truth of if he covered-up is a bit differently narrated by the "conservative" Francis mouthpiece Moynihan.

The Inside the Vatican editor's attack against the "traditional conservatives" in his Letter #54 email in 2018 was all about his great concern of the "danger" of "a split in the Church" and his hope that "Francis, even now, could lead a reform."

He is sticking to this narrative despite the fact that he as a Vatican expert is well aware that Francis's inner circle is riddled with homosexual and financial corruption.

He apparently doesn't want a "split" between the honest and morally upright Catholics who believe in "immoveable doctrines" who are "exploiting this... against a popular Pope" whose inner circle is in large part made up of the corrupt "gay lobby" in the Vatican and the McCarrick pro-gay bishops network. Here is some of Moynihan's "narrative":

"One danger is a split in the Church."

"... And many powerful conservative Catholics in America are exploiting this [papal gay sex abuse cover-up] revulsion... against a popular Pope."

"... This does not mean Pope Francis should resign."

"... Francis, even now could lead a reform."

Of course, the Vatican expert Moynihan knows who will help Francis with those reforms: the Pope's inner circle.

The papal inner circle of Francis's "closest collaborators and confidants" includes Vatican Bank Msgr. Battista Ricca of the alleged "gay affairs" scandal who houses the Pope in his Vatican hotel. Vice-Pope Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga of the gay Honduras seminary scandal. C9 Cardinal Ezzati who is Francis's collaborator of the Chile gay Barros scandal; and confidant Cardinal Coccopalmerio whose secretary is of the gay drug/orgy scandal which happened a few hundred yards away from where Francis lives in the gay Ricca's hotel.

As Moynihan knows, these are only some of the names.

According to Vatican expert Sandro Magister, Francis has a "number of homosexual priests in his inner circle of closest collaborators and confidants."
(Magister's Chiesa.com, December 16, 2016)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church and for the grace of God to fight harder for the restoration of the Church.








Comments

Skojec is unstable and sometimes nearly hysterical. Quite muliebral.

HIs recent fundraising plea was also revealing. Since he's gone full SJW on his commenters by banning all ThoughtCrime, his site is tanking. He should go back to real estate, where both his drama queenery and concerns for "branding" are welcomed.
I saw something interesting in the comboxes of Skojec's recent tincup rattle at 1P5, it was this:

A commenter was calling for financial transparency from Skojec and 1P5, and he noted that in the most recently available form990 from 1P5's publicly available financial records - almost 90% of the donations were paid out as salaries to Skojec and his wife to the whopping tune of almost $180,000 dollars.

Which brings me to my next curious point:

In my own follow-up research of Skojec's entry and rise in the blogging/news world of the Catholic Tradosphere - on one of his blogs several years ago, Skojec noted a sizable donation from a "Foundation" that enabled him to kickstart his entire apologetics venture all those years ago.

All of this makes one wonder if Skojec's hard-line position that "Franky is the Pope dammit!" - isn't so much from a rationalized theological view of his - but rather - from a financially motivated position instead. And this would certainly fit the MO of a guy like Skojec who constantly views his apologetics as a "marketing" venture whose success is measured in traffic hits and donations.
Sendero said…
Moynihan is the Bill Kristol of the Church of Francis via his teachings. Skojec is the Glenn Beck of Never-Benedict-ers. Both lost their status because people saw past their anti-arguments and recognized it as trying to protect the status quo.
Mr. Skojec's latest missive, "The Disastrous State of Things", is a textbook case of shaping a narrative. It is classic suppression, meant to discourage. In political parlance, we see from 1P5 the Controlled Opposition. The purpose of which is to claim credibility as a seasoned and trusted traditionalist, whilst subtly undermining the movement to restore those things that would cleanse and heal our Church.
Aqua said…
Very well put.

And one cannot possibly be a “traditionalist”, while accepting this new thing they call Popes Emeritus. Every evil starts with that. How can one be a traditionalist, when the Cornerstone is transformed under their noses without a peep of protest?
Debbie said…
Skojec is good friends with Hilary White. Hilary (and Michael Matt) have on numerous occasions boasted how Bergoglio is "good for business"....donations up, subscriptions up....booming business.

Hilary hates Ann. She hates her piety and her honesty. The dark hates the light.

After Skojec's now infamous Barnhardt FB posting last December, wherein Hilary accused Ann of some personality disorder, she (Hilary) and I had private messages. I would share them for all to see what a nut job she is, but I cant, because she told me things about herself that should only be said in a confessional.....but it stands to reason....I hear she rarely attends Mass or even prays.
Debbie said ...."I hear she rarely attends Mass or even prays."

I saw a photo of Hilary White recently among a small group of people kneeling and praying the Rosary in the middle of the destruction of the earthquake that hit Norcia Italy a few years back in 2016

And there she was kneeling - and looking intensely at her smartphone.
BTW - weren't Hilary and Ann roommates for a while in Italy?

Was there a dust-up between the two of them or something?

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul