Skip to main content

Pope Francis Reinstated a Serial Child Sexual Abuser & Other Scandals Requiring He Resign

Pope Francis needs to resign because:

He restored the priestly faculties of serial boy sex abuser Mauro Inzoli. Francis, in doing this injustice against the boy sex abuse victims, reversed Pope Benedict XVI's just sentence against this criminal.

He gave a position of honor at the Family Synod to the infamous sex abuse cover up enabler Cardinal Danneels who refused the request for justice of a young man sexually abused by one of Danneels's Belgian Bishops.

He appointed Cardinal Errazuriz to his inner circle of nine who covered up and protected Fr. Karadima, a sexual predator of children, for years according to Karadima's appeals judge.

He appointed Juan Barros to be Bishop of Osorno, Chile, whose longtime mentor was pedophile Fr. Karadima. The Pope ignored the protests of the families and friends of the pedophile priest's victims. He, also, ignored two former seminarians who said Barros was in the room when they were abused by Karadima. Francis even mocked their outcries. (This evidence against Barros and the Pope is documented by international child advocate attorney Elizabeth Yore.)

He recently made Bishop de Kesel a Cardinal who "appointed a man who had been convicted of sexually assaulting a 16-year-old boy as a parish priest" according to Breibart.

"Pope Francis has restored to office a man ultimately responsible for the distribution of condoms and abortifacient drugs, while removing from office the man who tried to ensure that Malteser International remained faithful to Catholic teaching" according lifenews.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...