Are Hillary and Media Cover-ups of Bill Clinton and Obama's Sexual Accusations almost Satanic in Light of Trump and Cain Media Events?

Juanita Broaddrick who accused Bill Clinton of raping her said Trump apologized; where's Hillary's apologies?

She said of Hillary's cover-up:

"I've never heard one apology for what Hillary Clinton did to me after she threatened me after her husband raped me."

Psychiatrist M. Scott Peck in his "People of the Lie: The Hope for Healing Human Evil" describes evil people as "terrified their false pretense will break down" and "that those in hell are there by their own choice and that they could walk right out of hell if they would relinquish their pride and ask for forgiveness."

According to Peck, it would be healing if Hillary asked for forgiveness for her cover-up and apologize as Trump did.

In an interview I did with Kathleen Willey for her book “Target" on the sexual accusation and cover-up ," I asked her:

Q: In your book “Target” you said “I believe Clinton would have raped me that day, just as, I believe, he raped Juanita Broadrick.” Do you believe that Clinton didn’t just sexually, but committed attempted rape?

Willey: "Whether he completed the act he originally had in mind isn't the primary thing. Violation takes many forms, and he committed that crime against me."

Q. Willey in your book you wrote that Hillary’s private investigators:

-Intimidated witnesses
-“[W]oman after woman has been demonized by their [the Clinton’s] secret police” according to Dick Morris
-Threatened your children
-Threatened your friend’s children
-Took one of your cats and killed another
-Left an animal skull on your porch
-Said you were in danger
-Followed you
-Put numerous nails in your car wheels
-Hid under your deck in the middle of the night
-Did a Watergate-like break-in into your house in 2007 and took a manuscript of your book “Target”

If Hillary is elected President, do you think she is capable of even doing worst things?

Willey: "Absolutely. There will be no stopping her then."

As with Hillary, it appears the media is "terrified their false pretense will break down" on having any
journalistic objectivity. It seems that it is breaking down. Bill O'Reilly said this morning that he's "100 percent convinced" of the media is plotting against Trump. O'Reilly said: 

"I'm talking about big conglomerates. ... News organizations have sent, not officially but through the corporate grapevine, [word] that we don't want anybody supporting Trump. If you study it, you can see which ones they are."

Exorcist Malachi Martin in his book “Hostage to the Devil”speaking of satanic false pretense said:

"The first task of the priest is to break that Pretense, to force the spirit to reveal itself openly as separate from the possessed...[t]his is often done skillfully, using details no one but the possessed could know. It can be very disarming, even pitiful...[s]ometimes the exorcist cannot shatter the Pretense for days. But until he does, he cannot bring matters to a head. If he fails to shatter it
at all, he has lost."

O'Reilly on the breaking of the false pretense of the media having any journalistic objectivity said:

"Now, for the fallout. By hacking into Podesta's e-mail, we know beyond any doubt that the American press is corrupt. At least to some extent.

For example, 'New York Times' political reporter Mark Leibovich appears to have given Hillary Clinton's spokeswoman Jennifer Palmieri editorial control over a major news story in 'The Times.' Reporter asked Miss Palmieri if he could use certain quotes that Hillary Clinton gave him in a private off the record meeting. That's against journalistic procedure. You don't write a political article okayed by a campaign. Another example, working for CNN at the time, now Democratic Chairwoman Donna Brazile apparently fed the Clinton campaign a question that CNN was going to ask doing a town hall meeting featuring Mrs. Clinton.

Again, that's corruption and that should never happen."

Finally this is not new, as I wrote in March 9, 2008 of the media cover-up of the Obama sexual inappropriate behavior accusation vs. making a media event of the Cain accusation.

The national media attacked Cain for one woman accusing him of inappropriate sexual behavior. But, at the exact same time the national media ignored two male student editors accusation of inappropriate sexual behavior of Obama as reported by the the Kansas Citian.

It seems that two persons accusing a man of inappropriate sexual behavior is more credible than one person's accusation.

This is not bias, but a cover-up.

-"During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN."(http://thekansascitian.blogspot.com/2011/11/barack-obama-accused-by-two-men-of.html)

-"A Chicago woman accused Herman Cain on Monday of trying to get sexual favors more than a decade ago in exchange for his help finding her a new job just after she had lost her post at an arm of the restaurant association he was then running."(http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57319854-503544/sharon-bialek-accuses-cain-of-sexually-inappropriate-behavior, http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2012/03/media-cover-up-of-obamas-inappropriate.html?m=1)