Skip to main content

What was the Real Agenda of the Media and VOTF?

By Fred Martinez

The media created uproar over the sex abuse scandal that started in Boston was not to protect children.

It is true that there is a scandal created by the majority of US Bishops which is centered on homosexual sex abuse of boys and male teens who make up 80% of the cases in the scandal. But the media, the majority of the US Catholic Bishops and Voice of the Faithful united to cover-up the fact that the vast majority of victims were abused by gays.

Fr. Robert Carr who serves St. Benedict's Parish in Somerville, MA, believes that the reason the Boston media started the crisis and pro-gay groups like the mass media as well as VOTF continued the uproar over the sex abuse scandal (with the necessary, gay cover-up) was "money."

"Now it is time to tell you the rest of the story. Those seeking to make lots and lots of money on embryonic stem cell research knew that Cardinal Law would be a problem. They, working with priests who did not like his stand on homosexuality, decided to come up with a sex abuse crisis to force him out. They modeled it on the removal of Cardinal Cody in the 1970's" said Rev. Carr.

"So you had radical members of the Democratic Party at Harvard, Radical Theologians at BC, angry priests, a few trial lawyers and a newspaper that wanted to make it big. Add a multimillionaire who was pulling the strings to get Law out of the way of his making millions on stem cell research a bunch of non-profits promised donations if they helped lobby against Law." [http://www.angelfire.com/ma4/cathedral/catholicismanew/index.blog?entry_id=1159134]

I was receiving numerous emails from a Voice of the Faithful fanatic claiming I was part of the bishops conspiracy and only VOTF cared about the victims. In his last email he said:"STICK TO THE SUBJECT. THE SUBJECT IS MONEY, MONEY, MONEY AND THE BISHOPS' LUST FOR IT."

So I send him Father Carr’s It All Comes Out in the Wash article. After numerous emails he stopped sending nonsense because he knew Carr had caught onto VOTF’s game. Carr carefully enumerates who is behind VOTF:

-"Well the Boston Globe has finally published what I knew would eventually come out. The whole gay rights thing in regard to adoptions had nothing to do with rights and everything to do with money. The United Way was calling the shots and demanding the gay adoptions as a condition of Catholic Charities receiving their money $1.4 million.

-"Now let me give you another line to draw. You can draw a line that connects the resignation of Cardinal Law, The United Way and Catholic Charities to one man: that man is Paul LaCamera. One of the men who walked out of Catholic Charities last Ash Wednesday. The LaCamera was the first to call for Cardinal Law to resign and then used his position at WCVB-TV to promote VOTF. He is on the board of directors at the United Way."

-"BU is where David D'Alessandro is Chairman of the Board...D'Alessandro is a story all by himself. Suffice it to say, he lobbied for the removal of Cardinal D'Alessandro headed the search committee for the new BU president. Now he is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of BU. Where, as Howie Carr would say, after a nationwide search, they found Paul LaCamera to be the man to run WBUR...BU is also home of VOTF's Longest serving President." [http://www.angelfire.com/ma4/cathedral/catholicismanew/index.blog?entry_id=1159134]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...