Skip to main content

Abortionist Obama: "I will not Yield and Planned Parenthood will not Yield"

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57643

Can a Catholic vote for Obama?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: February 29, 2008
1:00 am Eastern

© 2008

Those who accuse presidential aspirant Sen. Barack Obama of empty rhetoric must have missed his speech last July, recently made public, to the benefactors of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. At that festive event, he was as sharp and specific as a scalpel.

"The first thing I'd do as president," he told a cheering audience, "is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That's the first thing that I'd do."

The audience cheered enthusiastically. And well they might. As NARAL enthuses on its website, this act would "codify Roe v. Wade's protections and guarantee the right to choose for future generations of women."

In short, if we are to take Obama at his word, his first priority as president would be to serve an early death sentence on millions of unborn Americans.

Obama's record as state senator in Illinois and as United State senator show that these particular sentiments are not, as he might say, "just words."

In 2002, as an Illinois state senator, Obama voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act and twice helped kill it in committee. This bill would have protected those miracle babies that somehow survived late-term abortions.

When Jill Stanek, a delivery-ward RN and now WND columnist, appealed to Obama's committee that certain abortion doctors might be ideologically inclined to let such babies die, Obama replied, "What we are doing here is to create one more burden on a woman, and I can't support that."

Obama's Planned Parenthood speech five years later showed no softening of the heart. He attacked the Supreme Court for upholding a congressional ban on late term abortions, calling the decision "disturbing," and he worried out loud that the appointment of one more judge like Sam Alito or John Roberts could mean the end of Roe v. Wade.

(Column continues below)




To be sure, Obama voted against both Roberts and Alito and proudly reminded the audience of the same.

Although a self-described bridge-builder, on the issue of abortion Obama may be building his own ideological "bridge to nowhere."

"I will not yield and Planned Parenthood will not yield," he told his supporters, before adding disingenuously, "but that doesn't mean that we can't find common ground."

Just what "common ground" a man who holds even the life of certain newborns cheap can find with people who believe all human life is sacred eludes those of us less visionary than Mr. Obama.

Ostensibly compassionate, Obama pities his fellow citizens who fail to see his "big picture." Instead, he lamented, such people "seek out the narrowest and most divisive ground."

This seems to be a failing largely of fashion. As he joked to his audience, "Culture wars are so '90s."

"It is time to turn the page. We want a new day here in America," Obama continued, adding in his newfound colloquial voice, "We're tired about arguing about the same ol' stuff."

What makes Obama's appeal even more troubling is this very colloquialism, his unsubtle attempt to use language and skin color to link his dubious crusade to that of the civil rights leaders of the past.

In speaking of the debate between abstinence education and contraception-oriented sex education, for instance, Obama pulled an ace from up his sleeve that no other candidate could have.

Said Obama shamelessly, "As Martin Luther King used to say, 'It's not either/or, it's both/and.'" To be clear, King was not talking about sex education.

"We're the country that's fought generation after generation to extend that equality to the many, not restrict it to the few," Obama carried on, now fusing a woman's right to an abortion to that of a black child's right to an equal education. "We've been there before, and we're not going back."

Martin Luther King's niece, Alveda King, has an altogether different take on her uncle's legacy. As she says simply and logically, "How can the 'Dream' survive if we murder the children?" Unlike Obama, Alveda King is sensitive to the fact that black babies are nearly three times more likely to be killed in the womb than white.

President Bush captured the spirit of that legacy when he signed into law The Born Alive Infants Protection Act. This act, passed by unanimous voice vote in the Senate in 2002, is comparable to the one Obama killed in Illinois.

"It is a step toward the day when the promises of the Declaration of Independence will apply to everyone, not just those with the voice and power to defend their rights," said Bush in signing the bill.

"This law is a step toward the day when America fully becomes, in the words of Pope John Paul II, 'a hospitable, a welcoming culture.'" Indeed, the pope himself had earlier admonished America to honor its civil rights history by outlawing abortion.

From the perspective of the Catholic Church, abortion is like no other social issue. The Catholic Church allows for the possibility of a just war and even capital punishment under certain circumstances, but there is no such thing as a "just" abortion.

Anyone who has doubts about the Church's official position need only read the Pope John Paul II's 1999 revisiting of Pope Paul VI's historic encyclical, "Humanae Vitae." The pope does not mince words.

Depriving an innocent human being of life, and life undeniably begins at conception, is "always morally evil." He adds, "This tradition is unchanged and unchangeable."

There can be no yielding, he continues, to "convenient compromises" or the "temptation of self-deception." How can there be? "We are dealing," says the pope bluntly, "with murder."

In some Catholic circles, self-deception rules. There are those who had hoped to use the illegal immigration issue to offset abortion issues much as they used the death penalty issue in 2000 against George Bush.

But, as John McCain will certainly attest, God works in strange and mysterious ways. That issue no longer works even as a diversion.

A Catholic can vote for Obama. If he is willing to pay the price, he can do any fool thing he wants. After all, who among us hasn't done something foolish or sinful?

But most of us have better sense than to brag about it on our bumper stickers.

Comments

The Catholic Church allows for the possibility of a just war and even capital punishment under certain circumstances, but there is no such thing as a "just" abortion.
An abortion is just if the target of the abortion is a foreign invader or an unjust threat to innocent life.

As for Obama, he can write Pennsylvania off.

Popular posts from this blog

"Remember when Trump was up by 600,000 votes in Pennsylvania?": A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

  Matthew H @MattH_4America Remember when Trump was up by 600,000 votes in Pennsylvania? 1:07 PM · Jul 13, 2022 · Twitter Web App [https://twitter.com/MattH_4America/status/1547311877264400384] 10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborator

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Alone Bishop Gracida openly proclaims "Resist!" & Actively Works towards the Removal of Francis

    "You cannot give Holy Communion to the abortionists, to the abortion promoters and providers, to the divorce and remarried. You cannot do it. St. Paul said you do not feed the Eucharist to dogs..."   "Right now they [the laity] are suffering in silence. They need to object. The laity, the sensus fidelium is that common sense among the laity who have accepted the magisterial teaching of the Church which is the foundation of their faith."     "Having accepted that when they hear something that is contradictory to the magisterial teaching of the Church, the sensus fidelium is a impulse that causes them to speak out and say no."     "That is not true. Don't say that. Stop! That is the sensus fidelium in action!"     "Not to sit and suffer in silence. That's crazy. That's weird. That's wrong. Speak up! Resist! " - Bishop Rene Gracida [ https://youtu.be/arF9TlUVfiU ] We are in the greatest crisis in the history