Skip to main content

"The REAL apology that is owed by Niederauer is for seeing nothing wrong with [homosexual] adoption! "

From Gary Morella
stlouisix@msn.com

[homosexual]

Does the Archbishop of San Francisco believe that we were all born yesterday in regard to his incredible statement of apology, which is laughable?

The REAL apology that is owed by Niederauer is for not being a good shepherd to his flock by saying nothing to them whatsoever in regard to the abomination that is Most Holy Redeemer Church's blatant public promotion of sodomitic lifestyles. The REAL apology that is owed by Niederauer is for seeing nothing wrong with sodomite adoption!

The REAL apology that is owed by Niederaruer is for not publicly condemning, in the strongest terms possible, the filth of the sodomitic Folsom and Castro street fairs, and the promotion of sodomitic lifestyles at the state, county, and city levels, to particularly include San Francisco, with an attitude that is "to heck with the children in his state in complete ignorance of Matthew 18:6!"

You make think that you are fooling people, Archbishop Niederauer, by your worthless apology. If you do, you are delusional. Long suffering Catholics have caught your act and those of your ilk in California too many times. You have done nothing to rein in Catholic frauds, in particular your Mayor, who is absolutely giddy at the prospect of putting as many of his constituents on the fast track to hell with him as possible in the matter of advocating for oxymoronic sodomite marriage!

The REAL apology that is owed by the Archbishop of San Francisco is for NOT BEING A CATHOLIC!

And finally, the ultimate REAL apology is owed by Rome to Catholics worldwide in giving us wolves in sheeps clothing masquerading as bishops who could not care less about the eternity of the souls entrusted to them! -
Gary L. Morella


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





From :
Allyson Smith
Sent : Friday, October 12, 2007 10:22 AM
To :
Subject : Arbp. Niederaurer apologizes












--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment : winmail.dat (< 0.01 MB)


http://calcatholic.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?id=539c6e14-5a30-491e-9d2d-ef4351486eb8


Published: October 12, 2007


"I must apologize"


Statement released Oct. 11 by Archdiocese of San Francisco regarding
archbishop giving communion to two "Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence"


Below is Archbishop George H. Niederauer's column for the Oct. 19 issue of
Catholic San Francisco, the archdiocesan newspaper that is mailed to 85,000
households. This statement was provided to California Catholic Daily by
Maurice E. Healy, director of archdiocesan communications.

A recent event that greatly concerns me needs some additional explanation --
and with it an apology.

On Sunday, October 7, 2007, I celebrated Mass at Most Holy Redeemer Parish
here in San Francisco, during my first visit there. The congregation was
devout and the liturgy was celebrated with reverence. I noticed no
demonstration, no protest, no disruption
of the Eucharist.

At Communion time, toward the end of the line, two strangely dressed persons
came to receive Communion. As I recall one of them wore a large flowered hat
or garland. I did not recognize either of them as wearing mock religious
garb.

Afterward it was made clear to me that these two people were members of the
organization "Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence," who have long made a
practice of mocking the Catholic Church in general and religious women in
particular. My predecessors,
Cardinal William Levada and Archbishop John Quinn, have both denounced this
group's abuse of sacred things many times in the past. Only last year, I
instructed the Administrator of Most Holy Redeemer Parish to cancel the
group's use of the hall on the parish grounds, once I became aware of it.

In the year and a half since I arrived in San Francisco, there have been
several instances of offensive attacks on Catholic faith and devotional
life. Only two weeks ago Catholic San Francisco carried my remarks
condemning the derisive use of the image of the Last Supper on a poster
printed by another local group.

Although I had often seen photographs of members of the Sisters of Perpetual
Indulgence, I had never encountered them in person until October 7th. I did
not recognize who these people were when they approached me.

After the event, I realized that they were members of this particular
organization and that giving them Holy Communion had been a mistake.

I apologize to the Catholics of the Archdiocese of San Francisco and to
Catholics at large for doing so.

The manner of dress and public comportment of the Sisters of Perpetual
Indulgence is deeply offensive to women religious and to the witness of
holiness and Christian service that women religious have offered to the
Church and to the world for centuries. The citizens of San Francisco have
ample reason to be grateful to women religious for their unfailing support
of those most in need, and to be deeply offended when that service is
belittled so outrageously and offensively.

Someone who dresses in a mock religious habit to attend Mass does so to make
a point. If people dress in a manner clearly intended to mock what we hold
sacred, they place themselves in an objective situation in which it is not
appropriate for them to receive Holy Communion, much less for a minister of
the Church to give the Sacrament to them.

Therefore I conclude that the presence of the Sisters of Perpetual
Indulgence at the Mass on October 7th was intended as a provocative gesture.
In that moment I failed to recognize it as such, and for that, as I have
said, I must apologize.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

UPDATE: Fr. Ripperger's Prayer Recommendation for the Election: He Calls It "The Most Efficatious Prayer in Crushing Diabolical Influence In the Area of Oppression"!

During a recent interview on the Grace Force Podcast on YouTube, Exorcist Fr. Chad Ripperger   provided updated information that the prayers he officially recommends  for the laity to say with regard to the election, President Trump and our country  are the two  prayers posted below.  https://youtu.be/UKrLr4jW0Eo First of all, it is very important to start by saying that the usual means of receiving merit and graces are of paramount importance. That is, remain in a state of grace, recite the rosary daily, attend Mass as frequently as possible, receiving frequent communion, and frequent confession.  Father Ripperger mentions that we should offer all these things up and ultimately to be praying for an "honest, fair, and just election"..."and "for Trump's protection."  He references his book,  Deliverance Prayers: for Use by the Laity,  and states, "there is a prayer, and this is the one that I'm going to recommend because it's the one...