Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from January 5, 2020

Are 1P5 and Where Peter Is going to Merge and become Where One Peter Five Is?

There are rumors that Francis traditionalist Steve Skojec's One Peter Five (1P5) and Francis liberal Mike Lewis' Where Peter Is are going to merge and become Where One Peter Five Is. These rumors began when One Peter Five writer Eric Sammons and Lewis joined hands in their common communion in their Francis is definitely pope maligning campaign against Frank Walker's Canon 212 which is calling for an cardinal and bishop investigation into the validity or invalidity of Francis's pontificate due to irregularities in his conclave and the apparent canonical irregularities in the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI: Mike Lewis @mfjlewis 22h Replying to @CanonTwoTwelve @VanGogh70933357 and 3 others I have no idea what it means, but it has to be in the top 5 most wild C212 headlines of all time. View conversation ·

Is Cdl. Zen’s successor, Francis-appointed Hong Kong Cdl.Tong, an Enemy of the Chinese Underground Church?

Cardinal Joseph Zen in his letter and dubia to the cardinals said: "Your Eminence, can we passively witness the murder of the Church in China by those who should protect and defend her from her enemies?" "Begging on my knees, your brother." [ https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdl-zen-decries-vatican-china-deal-in-letter-to-cardinals-it-disgusts-me ] Moreover, Cardinal Zen told EWTN's Raymond Arroyo what the Chinese communist regime will do to the underground Church: “They will be allowed to function like underground bishops?” he asked. “Surely not. They are bringing them into the cage! That’s terrible. They are going to annihilate the underground Church.” Arroyo asked the Cardinal’s opinion on Francis collaborator Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo’s statement that the Chinese communist regime best realize the social doctrine of the Catholic Church: “Please leave him in peace. We don’t have to waste time to talk about that… That made everybody laugh, o

Were the Chinese & Vatican Gay Lobby involved in an Assassination Threat against Pope Benedict XVI?

Yesterday, in LifeSiteNews' article "Cdl. Zen urges cardinals to stop the 'murder of the Church in China,'" it was revealed that Cardinal Joesph Zen in his letter and dubia to the cardinals said: "I have reason to believe (and I hope one day to prove with archival documents) that the agreement signed is the same one that Pope Benedict had, at the time refused to sign." It appears the Chinese Communist regime may have had a reason to attempt to force Pope Benedict XVI's resignation since he may have refused to sign the China deal that betrayed the Chinese Catholic underground which Francis signed. If this is true, might the Vatican gay lobby which is closely associated with Francis have been involved with the attempt to force Pope Benedict to resign? Here is the evidence: New Ways Ministry revealed in 2012 that   Cardinal Paolo Romeo apparently was part of the Vatican gay lobby when the dissenting homosexual group posted that   GayStarNews

When Francis talks about "Change" does it mean Nothing & Eternal Death?

The Vatican II school of the Nouvelle Theologie (New Theology) appears to be central in Francis's thinking. This theology emphasizes becoming over being. Francis says Cardinal Walter Kasper is "profound." The National Catholic Reporter called Kasper "the 'pope's [Francis's] theologian.'" His theology is one extreme example of this school of thought. Kasper appears to not believe in being, but only in becoming because of his Hegelian philosophy. The philosopher Thomas Stark said that one of Kasper's central beliefs is "historical process," that is man's historical becoming or change. Remember that Francis's two favorite words are process and change. In "German Idealism and Cardinal Kasper's Theological Project" for The Catholic World Report, Stark wrote: "Kasper's...'spirit' that--Kasper himself says--is not identical to the third divine person, but is much more reminiscent of Heg

Is Francis the Totalitarian Communist Chinese's Pope?

Thomist scholar Dr. Taylor Marshall who heads the New Saint Thomas Institute in his YouTube channel said the Francis Vatican's biggest concern in 2020 is "money" because their money sources such as in the United States and other places are drying up. Marshall stated that the Francis deal with China which betrayed the Chinese Catholic underground Church is about "money": "They are worried they are going to lose all the money... [their] striking the deal with China is a way to get money from China." (Taylor Marshall.com, "When Pope Francis Slapped Woman's Hand: Predictions," 49:18- 49:50, December 7, 2020) Most international and Vatican observers appear oblivious to the crumbling of Francis's apparent Vatican geopolitical Socialist alliances and that those alliances are financially supported by China and if Marshall is right the Vatican wants that same financial support. Any one who has read Francis's only book "Dialo

Is Where Peter Is's Lewis "Proximate to Heresy" according to Vatican I Expert?

Mike Lewis of the Where Peter Is blog appears to believe that Francis's teaching allowing Communion for adulterers is infallible. Lewis who is a Pachamama and Francis apologist apparently thinks Francis cannot fall into heresy because he is definitely pope and "ALL" his "statements... are infallible": Here is what Vatican I expert Fr. Chad Ripperger, PhD, in his book "Magisterial Authority" says to Lewis who it appears is "proximate to heresy": "[T]reat[ing] ALL papal statements as if they are infallible... is proximate to heresy because it rejects the precise formulation of the conditions of infallibility as laid out in by Vatican I... by essentially saying that the pope is infallible regardless of conditions." "... Worse still, those who were to follow a pope who was in error in a non-infallible teaching which is taught contrary to something that is infallible is not, therefore, excused." (Magisterial Authority, Pa

Why's Leftist Environmentalist Mike Lewis implying TFP's De Oliveira is a Fascist?

Might leftist environmentalist Where Peter Is's Mike Lewis be implying that Plinio Correa de Oliveira is a Fascist because he doesn't know what he's talking about? The anti-Hitler and anti-Communist de Oliveira who founded Tradition, Family and Property (TFP) in 1942 wrote: "Hitler prefers the advance of Russia to the Anglo-American coalition. Defeated, he tries to influence the configuration of tommorow's world. This is his ultimate crime." (O Legionario, 23 August 1942) Leftist always want to pretend that Hitler wasn't a Socialist like them and preferred the Socialist Communist Russians to the non-Socialist Anglo-American coalition. Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate of Mary.

Bp. Gracida: "[I]f the [Pope Benedict XVI] Renunciation is Doubtful, then in Virtue of Canon 332 §2, it is Invalid for lack of due Manifestation"

Bishop Rene Gracida summed it up best on the doubtfulness of the Pope Benedict XVI resignation: "[I]f the [Pope Benedict XVI] Renunciation is doubtful, then in virtue of canon 332 §2, it is invalid for lack of due manifestation" [ https://abyssum.org/  ] Moreover, it appears that if someone has definite solid reasons from canon law to doubt the validity of Pope Benedict XVI's resignation one can it appears possibly commit a sin if he doesn't resolve that doubt before claiming Francis is definitely pope. The important theological book "Rodriguez and the Confession of Doubtful Mortal Sins" in page 225 says: "If one does not resolve the doubt and deliberately does the action anyhow, it means that he is willing to offend God gravely, and therefore he commits a mortal sin." (Google: Theological Studies -cdn- 1 PDF by U. Adelman - Cited by 1 Related articles) Please read canon law expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo's detailed thesis on why Pope B

2014 1P5 Skojec: The "Office" of a True Pope means "Never has he [Francis] Officially endorsed Cardinal Kasper’s Erroneous Views on Adulterous Marriages – Nor could he!"

In 2014, One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec said the "office" of a true pope means "never has he [Francis] officially endorsed Cardinal Kasper’s erroneous views on adulterous marriages – nor could he!": "And yet despite the pope’s compliments on Kasper’s thought , never has he officially endorsed Cardinal Kasper’s erroneous views on adulterous marriages – nor could he! The infallibility of his office prevents him from doing so . [1P5's bolding]": [ https://onepeterfive.com/the-troubling-case-of-cardinal-kasper/ ] A One Peter Five commenter Asbury Fox  tried to give Skojec an out from saying a true pope "could" " never... officially endorsed Cardinal Kasper’s erroneous views on adulterous marriages": Asbury Fox • 5 years ago   "I would disagree with the statement that the Pope could never accept Kasper's views. I think that the evidence has shown that Francis is in perfect agreement with Kasper, only th

Can one commit a Mortal Sin by claiming that Francis is Definitely Pope?

If someone has definite solid reasons from canon law to doubt the validity of Pope Benedict XVI's resignation can one commit a mortal sin if he doesn't resolve that doubt before claiming Francis is definitely pope? The important theological book "Rodriguez and the Confession of Doubtful Mortal Sins" in page 225 says: "If one does not resolve the doubt and deliberately does the action anyhow, it means that he is willing to offend God gravely, and therefore he commits a mortal sin." (Google: Theological Studies -cdn- 1 PDF by U. Adelman - Cited by 1 Related articles) Now please read carefully the following: "The only sane conclusion is, therefore, that munus and ministerium are distinct terms with different meanings. They cannot substitute for one another in any sentence in which their proper senses are employed. Munus can substitute for officium, when officium means that which regards a title or dignity or ecclesiastical office." - Br. A