"Well, 'either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty'. The point is they cannot coexist."
By Mary's Secretary In my book The Practice of the Presence of Mary: To Live and Die with Mary , I dedicated Part II to Our Lady of Mount Carmel and Her scapular (fitting as Her feast is approaching), and I specifically mentioned how the scapular and spaghetti straps DO NOT go together. What I mean by that is I have noticed that those in the Church who DO NOT follow the Catholic dress code typically aren’t the ones wearing the scapular. I went on to say that modesty and the scapular go together and if you ever were immodest in dress, the scapular, being Our Lady’s sacramental that it is, gives one the grace to BECOME modest. I can attest to this in my own life. Only after I was enrolled in the scapular did I begin, little by little, become modest. It’s a process. Kind of like the rosary quote, “one either gives up the sin or they give up the rosary.” Well, “either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty”. The point is they cannot coexist. In fact...
Comments
Because this is part of the consequence of original sin that every baptized person carries with him.
Both the legitimate successors of the first Roman Pontiff and the simple faithful live this consequence.
But sin is not about grace.
And this assistance of the Holy Spirit is always present to the legitimate successors of Saint Peter.
The Pope will always be a Catholic to confirm this faith to other Catholics to maintain a unity in the faith.
And the bishops possess this infallibility equally if they maintain this communion with the Pope.
But Viganò says to this day about a responsibility of Popes in the face of a legacy that the "conciliar sect" emerged.
Was this or was not the cause for him seeking a total unconditional reconsecration of another bishop, even though he had received episcopal consecration by Pope John Paul II himself?
In this way, will he, as prelate, really present a solution to this "Bergoglian sect"?