Nick Donnelly @ProtecttheFaith Archbishop Vigano on the untenable position of [the Matt/Bp.Schneider] Recognise & Resist to an apostate claiming to be pope @CarloMVigano
Archbishop Vigano on the untenable position of Recognise and Resist to an apostate claiming to be pope
After Michael Matt censored my speech last year because he felt I had crossed his red line, I was not surprised to not be invited to this year's Catholic Identity Conference.
The impassable line is the one indicated by Bishop Schneider, who denounces “Francis” for having violated the First Commandment and contradicted the Gospel, asserting however that he remains Pope finding in Peter’s denial an authoritative precedent. In fact Bergoglio has not only violated the First Commandment but has denied the two principal Mysteries of the Faith: Unity and Trinity of God; Incarnation, Passion and Death of Our Lord Jesus Christ. A total abjuration of the Catholic Faith!
According to Bishop Schneider, it would therefore be possible to be a heretic and an apostate and still belong to the Catholic Church, and even preside over it as Supreme Pastor; while it is enough to denounce that a heretic and an apostate who has usurped the See of Peter cannot be Pope, to incur excommunication.
Evidently this red line - which for me who denounce Bergoglio as a usurper because he is an apostate and a heretic is insurmountable - can be crossed with impunity by Bergoglio, continuing to be recognized as Pope precisely by those "moderate conservatives" who also accuse him of heresy and apostasy, without however drawing the necessary consequences. In this way they become his accomplices, because they attribute legitimacy to the acts that Bergoglio carries out, but at the same time they boast of being able to disobey him (which they then do not do, starting with the slavish application of Traditionis Custodes, because they fear being removed), without realizing that this courtly behavior confirms how falsified the unanimous and peaceful recognition of the Pope by Catholics is.
Michael Matt prematurely applied the ostracism that Bergoglio's "excommunication" would have sanctioned a year later. And it is difficult to believe that he wants to defend a comrade in battle for Tradition, when with his own behavior he supports and even anticipates the unruly revenge of the enemy of both; an enemy that he persists in considering Pope.
Edward Snowden, a victim of the deep state for having denounced with Wikileaks the subversive plan of surveillance of the population hatched by the Anglo-American deep state, stated: "When denouncing a crime is considered a crime, you are led by criminals". In the synodal church and under the reign of Bergoglian mercy, denouncing heresy and apostasy is considered a crime deserving of excommunication. I leave it to the acumen of Michael Matt and Athanasius Schneider to conclude the sentence coherently.
Comments