Skip to main content

...."Since when did Archbishop Viganò declare that all the popes since 1958 were antipopes?" ....Vigano’s allegation isn’t that Francis didn’t “fully consent” to be pope but that he “fully consents” to destroy the papacy. ....The 2013 papal election seemingly was null because it was the result of an illicit political campaign to oust Benedict XVI and install Francis. The evidence is mountains high! Lefebvre would have been the first to condemn this!

...."Since when did Archbishop Viganò declare that all the popes since 1958 were antipopes?"


....Vigano’s allegation isn’t that Francis didn’t “fully consent” to be pope but that he “fully consents” to destroy the papacy.


....The 2013 papal election seemingly was null because it was the result of an illicit political campaign to oust Benedict XVI and install Francis. The evidence is mountains high! Lefebvre would have been the first to condemn this!

Comments

Renato said…
The circumstances show that the Viganò and the Society of St. Pius X are focused only on a return of Tradition.

These statements cited in the article about him by an illegitimate Pope Francis are aimed at speculation, not a canonical quest to recognize him as actually an illegitimate Roman Pontiff. And the others who were legitimate are not in his concern. Nothing more.

That's why Viganò said he won't go to Rome for lack of interest.

Thus all this is clear what Father Chazal, who is a member of the Resistance founded by Bishop Williamson, says about the confirmation of the unconditional reconsecration of Viganò according to the same priest, and a mutual cooperation between them until this return – the link below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEpqo4JomNk

And the Society is not interested if it celebrates its Masses "una cum" Pope Francis.

There is much said that the Society will consecrate more bishops and nothing is said about a papal mandate, although Bergoglio himself favored it on some points.

Lefebvre's foundation today also with Viganò does not care whether he is a legitimate pope or not.
2:17 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...
3 comments
Read more

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...
96 comments
Read more

Has the Trad Media fallen into a COVID-like mass formation with "the Uncola or 'UnFrancis'" Leo XVI? While it's humorous to see the former anti-Francis Trad pundits suddenly acting like teen age girls infatuated with Leo, it could lead to a Trojan Horse effect

May 2023-Cardinal Robert Prevost Honorary Doctorate from the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo (USAT). Posted by Elizabeth Yore... ... Frankly, it’s shocking and inconceivable that a newly elected pontiff would cite as his guiding light the theology of Joseph Bernardin, a known sexual predator and radical collaborator of Marxist and community activist, Saul Alinsky... ... Bernardin and the Alinsky... gave birth to the moral relativism of Bernardin’s seamless garment religion, which is referenced in Prevost’s speech. Prevost espouses the “seamless garment” radical ideology of Cardinal Joseph Bernardin , former Archbishop of Chicago. It is long overdue that American Catholics wake up about the real Joseph Bernardin . [ https://www.yorechildren.com/blog/2025/5/20/the-chicago-way] It is difficult to capture all the arresting insights of Desmet’s rewarding book, which includes the startling claim that [COVID] tyrannical leaders are, very often,  themselves  captive t...
Post a Comment
Read more