Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
Regardless of what anyone thinks about Archbishop Vigano,
What he’s saying is church teaching…
according to a papal bull of Pope Paul IV
It states that anyone who is a heretic cannot be elevated to ecclesiastical Church offices…
Read it below…
The Bull Cum ex apostolatus officio of Paul IV established in perpetuity the nullity of the nomination or election of any Prelate - including the Pope - who had fallen into heresy before his promotion to Cardinal or elevation to Roman Pontiff. It defines the promotion or elevation as nulla, irrita et inanis - void, invalid, and without any value - "even if it took place with the agreement and unanimous consent of all the Cardinals; nor can it be said that it is validated by the receipt of the office, consecration, or
possession [...], or by the putative enthronement [...] of the Roman Pontiff himself or by the
obedience given to him by all and by the course of any duration of time in the said exercise of his office."
It was necessary for an Italian journalist to retrieve a piece of writing from Viganò, a kind of screenshot of the deleted page on the old Twitter, which clearly said that these were apostates and heretics.
For he is like a serpent that insinuates here and there; The interested party, however, will not find anything clear from him with this.
And to get out in the field of speculation is what is desired here.
Thus there is another controversy between sedevacantists and traditionalists in relation to Viganò, but in my country. It refers to this: Viganò, Williamsom and Dugin.
Certainly neither the Italian archbishop nor the English bishop have answered what they intend with the Satanist and Gnostic of Dugin.
What is this expectation about a coming of the "Third Rome" between the two?
---
https://x.com/Agdchan/status/1501375910896930818
https://pch24.pl/abp-carlo-maria-vigano-dugin-dla-katolikow/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjulG8s0Qv4&t=357s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nQeEGsCf7U&t=4193s
https://gloria.tv/post/Fa8RY1dQhwQb3tkSaN3ra46MJ