Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
The article is very good, because it only confirms a world control, in this way, logically takes the need for the single currency with these catalysts, with the example of the "pandemic" and now the financial crisis provoked, which leads us to panic and forces us to accept it. Ukraine is that laboratory through the 2030 agenda. Smartcities will be our future, a kind of controlling but digital Chinese regime.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzbtnBZFIjc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TD-nl04Waw
https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/us-funding-experiment-digital-control-ukraine