Skip to main content

Vigano: Francis Teaching "Blatant Heresy... a Very Serious Apostasy & a Terrible Blasphemy" & Has "Francis has Lost the Papacy"?

 Quote/s of the Day – 24 January – St Francis de Sales – AnaStpaul

- Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Last year, CNS News reported that "Archbishop Carlo Vigano, the former Vatican ambassador to the United States, said this idea [of Francis] is a 'blatant heresy' and a 'terrible blasphemy'":

In reference to a document signed by Muslim Imam Ahmad Al-Tayyeb and Pope Francis that says the "diversity of religions" in the world is "willed by God," Archbishop Carlo Vigano, the former Vatican ambassador to the United States, said this idea is a "blatant heresy" and a "terrible blasphemy."

That specific teaching in the document has also been denounced by Cardinal Raymond Burke, an American, Bishop Athanasius Schneider of Kazakhstan, and numerous Christian scholars...

[... ]

"In his Abu Dhabi declaration, Pope Francis said that God wants all religions," commented Archbishop Vigano.  "Not only is this a blatant heresy, it is also a very serious apostasy and a terrible blasphemy."

 "Saying that God wants to be worshipped as something other than how He revealed Himself means that the Incarnation, Passion, Death and Resurrection of our Savior are completely meaningless," said Vigano.

"It means that the reason for founding the Church, the reason for which millions of holy Martyrs gave their lives, for which the Sacraments were instituted, along with the priesthood and the papacy itself, are all meaningless," he added. [https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/michael-w-chapman/arbp-vigano-pope-francis-teaching-blatant-heresy-terrible-blasphemy]

Dr. Taylor Marshall on his YouTube show explained why after Archbishop Vigano said that the Francis Abu Dhabi statement is "blatant heresy" that it is possible "Francis has lost the papacy":

"[Vigano said] this [the Abu Dhabi statement] is a blatant heresy... Let's pause there. This gets into St. Robert Bellarmine where he says a manifest heretic immediately and de facto loses the papacy. So, if Bellarmine is right and Vigano is right that means that Francis has lost the papacy... then Bellarmine would also say there is a general council that then declares the deposition that the pope has fallen for manifest heresy."
(Dr. Taylor Marshall YouTube Show, "Archbishop Vigano calls on Pope and Bishops to Repent Amidst Corona Crisis," April 1, 2020, 16:16-16:58)

However, theologian Cardinal Raymond Burke disagreed with the YouTube podcaster Marshall's claim that a "general council" is needed when the Catholic World Report (CWR) asked him:

"CWR: Who is competent to declare him to be in heresy?"

"Cardinal Burke: It would have to be members of the College of Cardinals."
(Catholic World Report, "Cardinal Burke : 'No, I am not saying that Pope Francis is in Heresy." December 19, 2016)

Note that Burke said "members of the College of Cardinals," not the whole College of Cardinals many of whom may be presumed to apparently be heretics. That sounds like a imperfect council not a "general council."
 

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He want you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost - Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

- Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)


Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said "the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church."
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

- "If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

- "Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

 -  LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"

-  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."

- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes:  

- Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

- Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times "Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003": http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

- Tucker Carlson's Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written" according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1
 
- A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020:
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1
 
What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: "Anitfa 'Agent Provocateurs'":
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God's Will and to do it.
 
Pray an Our Father now for America.
 
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

 

 

Comments

Christine said…
Bergoglio never had the papacy. Pope Benedict never abdicated.
Anonymous said…
I agree that Bishop Bergoglio has lost the papacy.

'Ispo facto' due to his long-standing and multiple heresies.

Everyone most make this known to their bishops - one needs to say to one's local bishop that one does not consider Bergoglio to be pope anymore.

In addition everyone most immediately stop ALL money going to the collection and all standing orders to parishes, dioceses and publications with a note to one benefactives that it is to remain the case while Bergoglio occupies to chair unlawfully.
Aqua said…
Some people make this way too hard, including (especially) those of rank.

Here is a Dogma.

There is the Papal act, claim, proclamation.

Do they align, or not?

Are they compatible or opposite?

AL Footnote 351: “ “It can no longer simply be said that all those in any ‘irregular’ situation are living in a state of mortal sin and are deprived of sanctifying grace.”

“Jesus Christ, Mohammed, Jehovah, Allah - these are all names employed to describe an entity that is distinctly the same across the world.”

“the Eucharist is not the reward of saints, no, it is the Bread of sinners”

“Pachamama earth god on St. Peter’s High Altar during Holy Mass is acceptable Liturgical expression”

“Pachamama is equivalent to our Blessed Mother and Wicca incantations are valid liturgical expressions”

Failing to notice and act on something this obvious is gross spiritual malpractice and as with all such cases, people are being harmed and killed (spiritually). It must be recognized and rectified - for all our sakes, starting with those in authority who will be judged for what spiritual and temporal gifts and connected responsibilities they’ve been given.
Charmaine said…
Estefanía Acosta, author of the book: "Benedict XVI: Pope "Emeritus"?, had this to say in the combox of the article at FromRome.Info:
"VIGANÒ GIVES BATTLE CRY AGAINST GREAT RESET, FROM THE WRONG SIDE OF THE LINES":

Estefanía Acosta
JUNE 1, 2021 AT 3:24 PM
We must be very very careful with this man… His goal is probably the Chair of Peter, for himself or for one of his accomplices. Why does not he recognize H.H. Benedict XVI as the Pope? Easy. The underlying reasoning is as follows: Bergoglio is the Pope, but a dreadful one; therefore, he must resign or be deposed; therefore…. the See will be vacant and, at last, after more than 50 years, the Church will have a decent Pope, a Pope who knows exactly how the Church must be (a Pope very different from “the bavarian theologian”, and from the rest of the postconciliar Popes). Because, you know, only Viganò, only the tradicionalists, really know how the Church must be. A great danger, indeed! Careful…
JTLiuzza said…
Can't lose what you never possessed.
Aqua said…
To tie in with what Charmaine posted above, the first heresy that must be addressed is that a Pope is no longer Pope without first resigning his Office of the Papacy - which belongs to him for life; that a Conclave can be called to elect another Pope while a living Pope still retains the Office of the Papacy; that another one can possess the Papacy without first possessing the Office of the Papacy; that two (or more) visible Popes can co-exist within the same Vatican space before the assembled world and before God; that there has ever been and was intended by God that there could ever be such a thing as a Pope who remains Pope while retired from actively ruling as Monarchical Vicar of Christ Pope.

This is the Mother Of All Heresies, because it is at the cornerstone of our Church - the Rock and the nature of the Rock who is our visible ruler.

This cannot be ignored or passed by. It must be addressed before any other heresy - which is, after all, exactly what we should expect from a usurper anti-Pope - can be corrected and addressed.

EVERYTHING depends upon returning to the faulty resignation statement (not a full and complete abdication), acknowledging its error and correcting all that resulted therefrom. That faulty act brought the Church to a full stop. Nothing is valid until that act is acknowledged for what it truly was and then corrected in some canonically legitimate way.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...