Skip to main content

Would the Medieval French King have "Threatened" Francis "with Burning at the Stake, as a Heretic"?

The Medieval Pope John XXII taught heresy on a relatively minor point on when people received the beatific vision.

The French King Philippe de Valois not being a timid rabbit like Bishop Athanasius Schneider or Cardinal Raymond Burke wasn't afraid to issue a correction against heresy with a warning:

"Philippe de Valois... threatened  John XXII with burning at the stake, as a heretic."
(On History: Introduction to the History (1831),  By Jules Michelet, Page 126)

If King de Valois were alife today would he with a correction have "threatened" Francis for his Communion for adulterers heresy "with burning at the stake, as a heretic"?

Why can't Cardinal Burke follow the French king's example by issuing a correction to Francis for his Communion for adulterers heresy without the "burning at the stake, as a heretic" part?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of the Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
Where do you find these pearls!

Kudos!
Ademar said…
JMJ

In a Catholic society, such as King Philippe's was, grave sin was dealt with by means of capital punishment in its three-fold good of Retribution, Reparation, and Deterrence. As a result, Godly societal order was preserved thru the corresponding three-fold result of Justice for the aggrieved, Expiation for the guilty, and Hesitancy of would-be evildoers to commit evil.

In our current luciferian order within society, wherein evil is rewarded and good punished, a massive reset is needed, including generously-applied capital punishment for grave sins. The reset will require Divine intervention, but keeping in mind that God usually uses human instruments for that. Would that Cdl. Burke, Bp. Schneider, and others realize that and act accordingly -- because if the human instruments of Divine intervention refuse to cooperate, He is forced to act in more dramatic, and painful ways to accomplish the reset.

Domina Nostra de Fatima, ora pro nobis!
Red feather said…
Bishop Schneider is a deadbeat shepherd in light of his last missive. We need more like archbishop emeritus Lenga.
Alexis Bugnolo said…
I sent you another very important email just now.
Praypraypray said…
Exactly! “ The reset will require Divine intervention, but keeping in mind that God usually uses human instruments for that...
...if the human instruments of Divine intervention refuse to cooperate, He is forced to act in more dramatic, and painful ways to accomplish the reset.”
So many today, are waiting for God to come down out of the clouds and take care of business! Of course, He could do that. However, I wonder, if that’s supposed to be the only case, WHY does God bother to give us Shepherds!?! Aren’t they supposed to protect the sheep from the wolves who are now raging and trying to take down souls? Don’t the Shepherds believe that they will one day be held accountable for THEIR OWN PART in protecting or not protecting the Church and God’s people. What are they each going to say to God?
Ummm, I was waiting for YOU to do something about it!?!

Did Moses wait for God to come down to do something when he saw the idolaters with the golden calf? No! Of course Not! He threw the tablets down at them. God worked THROUGH Moses, but Moses did what he knew God would want him to do. He didn’t sidestep or blame others or make excuses or rationalize or call a committee together to decide on things. He just did his duty.
Please, pray that the cardinals and bishops will do their duty, and then they can tell God, that they cared enough to take care of His flock.
Thank you for the prayers, which are very much needed, today.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk