Skip to main content

Why is Ferrera now Pretending that Archbishop Lenga doesn't Exist?

 In 2015 and 2016, it appears Remnant writer Chris Ferrara wasn't a Francis traditionalist. In 2016, the writer said:

"Perhaps a better approach is to amass the evidence and send it to every cardinal, demanding they convene [an imperfect council] and issue the kind of judgement Bellarmine contemplated in this situation: not that the Pope is deposed, but that he has deposed himself. Such a hypothetical conclave would offer the Pope an opportunity to explain himself."
(One Peter Fives' comment section, "If Francis is an Antipope, We Can't know it Yet," June 21, 2016)

In 2015, Ferrera said that Archbishop Jan Pawel Leng's statement that "It is difficult to believe that Pope Benedict XVI freely renounced his ministry as successor of Peter" was of "historic importance":

"We can assume that prudence constrained Archbishop Lenga not to point directly at the place where the trail of accountability ends. That aside, however, his later comments leave no doubt that he wishes us to know that the ultimate problem now confronting us resides precisely in the papacy.  First, a statement that is of nothing less than historic importance: statement that is of nothing less than historic importance:

'It is difficult to believe that Pope Benedict XVI freely renounced his ministry as successor of Peter. Pope Benedict XVI was the head of the Church, his entourage however has barely translated his teachings into life, bypassed them often in silence or has rather obstructed his initiatives for an authentic reform of the Church, of the liturgy, of the manner to administer Holy Communion.'" []

Why is Ferrera now pretending that Archbishop Lenga doesn't exist? 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of the Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


Alexis Bugnolo said…
Because since they John Westen organized The Council, which explicitly requires that no one criticize the approach of Schneider and Burke, and recruited all Trad Inc into it. Westen is an ex atheist he says. child pyschologist.
Debbie said…
Why is Ferrara pretending....? Probably for the same reason he publicly pretends to believe Bergoglio is Pope.
Justina said…
But why, Brother? I agree with your analysis, but what's in it for them?
Alexis Bugnolo said…
Justina, I think we cannot answer your question until we see a list of their major donors, and for that we would need an insider to blow the whistle.

I do know this, because I was an avid reader of the Remnant in the 90s. Matt Sr said that he was approached by a Jew who wanted to give him 25 to 50 thousand a year for his paper on the condition that he ran articles favorable to Israel. Matt objected and spilled the beans in an article in his paper. But several years later began runing articles about archeology in Israel. I see that Gloria TV which just lamented a lack of funding has just started to run articles about archeology in Israel, though I may be mistaken because I have not read Gloria before Oct 2019.

I think this money is Israel Intelligence sourced and is part of their narrative control objectives for the world.
Ferrara is not pretending. He is scared to death of offending his master Bergoglio, Trad Inc. and his lavender mafia superiors...

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk