Skip to main content

Why is Ferrera now Pretending that Archbishop Lenga doesn't Exist?

 In 2015 and 2016, it appears Remnant writer Chris Ferrara wasn't a Francis traditionalist. In 2016, the writer said:

"Perhaps a better approach is to amass the evidence and send it to every cardinal, demanding they convene [an imperfect council] and issue the kind of judgement Bellarmine contemplated in this situation: not that the Pope is deposed, but that he has deposed himself. Such a hypothetical conclave would offer the Pope an opportunity to explain himself."
(One Peter Fives' comment section, "If Francis is an Antipope, We Can't know it Yet," June 21, 2016)

In 2015, Ferrera said that Archbishop Jan Pawel Leng's statement that "It is difficult to believe that Pope Benedict XVI freely renounced his ministry as successor of Peter" was of "historic importance":

"We can assume that prudence constrained Archbishop Lenga not to point directly at the place where the trail of accountability ends. That aside, however, his later comments leave no doubt that he wishes us to know that the ultimate problem now confronting us resides precisely in the papacy.  First, a statement that is of nothing less than historic importance: statement that is of nothing less than historic importance:

'It is difficult to believe that Pope Benedict XVI freely renounced his ministry as successor of Peter. Pope Benedict XVI was the head of the Church, his entourage however has barely translated his teachings into life, bypassed them often in silence or has rather obstructed his initiatives for an authentic reform of the Church, of the liturgy, of the manner to administer Holy Communion.'" [https://archive.fatima.org/perspectives/sv/perspective698.asp]

Why is Ferrera now pretending that Archbishop Lenga doesn't exist? 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of the Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
   

Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
Because since they John Westen organized The Council, which explicitly requires that no one criticize the approach of Schneider and Burke, and recruited all Trad Inc into it. Westen is an ex atheist he says. child pyschologist.
Debbie said…
Why is Ferrara pretending....? Probably for the same reason he publicly pretends to believe Bergoglio is Pope.
Justina said…
But why, Brother? I agree with your analysis, but what's in it for them?
Alexis Bugnolo said…
Justina, I think we cannot answer your question until we see a list of their major donors, and for that we would need an insider to blow the whistle.

I do know this, because I was an avid reader of the Remnant in the 90s. Matt Sr said that he was approached by a Jew who wanted to give him 25 to 50 thousand a year for his paper on the condition that he ran articles favorable to Israel. Matt objected and spilled the beans in an article in his paper. But several years later began runing articles about archeology in Israel. I see that Gloria TV which just lamented a lack of funding has just started to run articles about archeology in Israel, though I may be mistaken because I have not read Gloria before Oct 2019.

I think this money is Israel Intelligence sourced and is part of their narrative control objectives for the world.
Ferrara is not pretending. He is scared to death of offending his master Bergoglio, Trad Inc. and his lavender mafia superiors...

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...