Skip to main content

Does St. Paul Condemn Francis's Amazon Doc Author Suess for approving of "Communion with Devils"?

The key author of Francis's Amazon Synod's working document, Fr. Paulo Suess, apparently approves of "communion with devils" according to the Bible which is inerrant according to the infallible teachings of the Catholic Church.

Today, LifeSiteNews quoted Suess saying:

[S]o what. Even if it would have been a pagan rite [the Vatican indigenous ritual], then it is nevertheless a pagan worship of God."

In 1 Corinthians 10:20, St. Paul apparently condemns Francis's Amazon Synod's document author Suess for approving of the indigenous shaman's prayer offerings to their pagan gods which are "demons... and not... God" which appears to lead to "communion with devils":

"[T]he Gentiles [pagans] sacrifice [offering], they sacrifice [offer] to demons, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have communion with devils."

In a sense, pagan prayer is a sacrifice of the will and intellect in worshipping demons so it should be considered towards leading to "communion with devils."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.




Comments

Jack said…
It's their modernist theology in practice. They either believe that all acts of religion are supernatural and divine, or that in any case there's no distinction between natural and supernatural religion. This is based on the Modernist doctrine of immanentism as outlined in Pius X's encyclical Pascendi, which says that the source of all religion is a swelling up of "religious sentiment" in the human heart. They're probably agnostic about the existence of demons, and have a very sentimental and optimistic view of humanity of nearly all men being sincere and good-willed, that is effectively Pelagianism and denial of original sin. In summary, they think religion is all a bunch of nice symbols, so why worry about it?
Unknown said…
We have just prayed an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church. Thank you for your blog.
Fred Martinez said…
Thank you.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk