Skip to main content

Is One-World Government Francis attempting to the Steal the Amazon from Brazil?

Updated February 15, 2020

In section 5 of Querida Amazonia Francis apparently said the Amazon belonged him and the whole world:

"[T]hat land [the Amazon] which is also 'ours.'"

Is he implying that a one-world government should steal the Amazon from Brazil?

Might Francis be the new Al Gore?

Vatican News reported that doomsday global warming alarmist Al Gore "praised Pope Francis' encyclical, 'Laudato si'" saying it addressed the "climate crisis ahead of the [United Nations' global warming] Paris Agreement."
(Vatican News, "Al Gore: Pope Francis a 'moral force' for solving climate crisis, July 4, 2018)

The Week in a 2018 headline proclaimed "How Pope Francis became the new Al Gore."

Francis in Laudato si (161) did become "the new Al Gore" doomsday global warming alarmist saying of climate warming:

"Doomsday predictions can no longer be met with... disdain."

It, also, appears that Francis may be "the new Al Gore" with his Amazon Synod which could be a globalist attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil.

The New York Times reported Gore inferring the possibility of a United Nations globalist attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil:

"Contrary to what Brazilians think, the Amazon is not their property, it belongs to all of us."
(The New York Times, "Whose Rain Forest is This, Anyway," May 18, 2008)

Francis in Laudato si (174-175) apparently backed Gore's inference of some type of globalist organization attempt to steal the Amazon by "imposing sanctions":

"[A]n agreement on systems of governance for the whole range of so-called 'global commons'... to devise stronger and more efficient international institutions... Empowered to impose sanctions."

This is exactly what was happening when the globalist's G-7 led by French President Emmanuel Macron according to the Internationalist which revealed the Amazon fires has brought about an "attempt[ed] internationalization of the Amazon."

Brazil President Jair Bolsonaro according to the Internationalist responded to this apparent attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil by accusing Marcon of "'having a colonialist mentality' which 'instrumentalises an internal issue of Brazil and other Amazonian countries' with 'a sensationalist tone that does nothing to solve the problem".
(Internationalist, "The G-7 Exploits Fires to Attempt Internationalization of the Amazon," August 26, 2019)

Remember that Francis said the Amazon Synod is the "child" of Laudato si which wants "systems of governance" for "'global commons'" such as Brazil's Amazon.

Is the Francis Amazon Synod part of an attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil?

If the "international institutions" are able to "internationalize" the "global common" of Brazil's Amazon where does it stop.

Do "systems of governance" for "'global commons'" ultimately end in a one-world government with the excuse of the doomsday myth of global warming?

(And, maybe, another excuse for internationalizing the Amazon might, also, include giving it to the control of the governance of the indigenous who can more easily be bought out by the one-world government advocates than the Brazilian nation.)

Remember that the New American wrote:

"Francis... claiming that planetary problems are exacerbated by 'an excessive demand for sovereignty on the part of States'... make room for 'international organizations' to develop into governing bodies, supplanting the 'state interests.'"
(The New American, "Pope Francis calls for end of  Sovereignty and Establishment of Global Government," May 9, 2019)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Comments

Debbie said…
Interesting Mr. Martinez. Thank you for all you do here. God bless and the Virgin protect you, your work and your family.
Fred Martinez said…
Debbie, Thank you for being a faithful reader of CM and for your prayer.
Magdallena said…
Saw this ebook on google and on page 322 there was an interesting thing said about Pachamama and political aims for the Amazon:

.."when the famous "nationalization" decree was passed. 10 In an article published on the Bolivian news site Bolpress in January 2012, the former minister elaborates on the supposed links—some of which are rather tenuous—between Equipo Nizkor, oil giant Exxon Mobil, the Rockefeller Foundation, George Soros's Open Society, and the Ford Foundation (Soliz Rada 2012). Echoing the articles just quoted, he warns that recent victories in international legal cases on indigenous rights could give prior consultation a veto power in ways that would "weaken even further national states like Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru, accelerating the risk of their disintegration." In another Bolpress article, titled "Pachamamismo in the Service of the Oil Companies" (Soliz Rada 2011), Soliz
Rada declares: "The oil companies and pachamåmicos [those defending Pachamama, "Mother Earth" in Aymara and Quechua] want to destroy peripheral nation-states. They advanced with this objective on obtaining constitutional recognition of twenty-six nonexistent indigenous nations in Bolivia. " p322 online book by Penelope Anthias, Limites to Decolonization, Indigeneity, Territory and Hydrocarbon Politics in the Bolivian Chaco.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk