Skip to main content

TnT Guest Co-Host Fr. Nix joins Bp. Gracida & Attorney Chris Ferrara in Calling for a "Imperfect Council" to Investigate if Francis is a Antipope

Frequent guest co-host on Dr. Taylor Marshall's YouTube TnT show Fr. David Nix apparently joined Bishop Rene Gracida and pro-life attorney in urging for a "imperfect council" to be called to investigate the validity of the 2013 conclave that elected Francis, the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and possibly for declaring Francis to be a explicit heretic.

Fr. Nix on Twitter in responding to Journalist Edward Pentin's Tweet called for "an imperfect council":

Edward Pentin Sep 28
At 3.30pm today on vigil of Michaelmas, priests will be privately praying Leo XIII's Prayer of Exorcism (the longer prayer to St Michael) at a church near Castel Sant'Angelo w/ intention to expel the "diabolical influence from the Vatican, especially in view of the "
Reply Retweet Like
FrDave Nix 📡
Exorcisms don't work if the people attached to the spirits remain. So, the spirits will remain, too. This sounds strong on paper, but it's futile until an imperfect council is called. Calling an imperfect council takes a lot more courage than deliverance prayers at a Church.

Comments

Aqua said…
“Son of man,I have made you a watchman over the house of Israel. When you hear a word from My mouth, give them a warning from Me. When I say to a wicked person, ‘you will surely die’, and you do not warn them or speak out to dissuade them from their evil ways, in order to save their life, that wicked person will die for their sin, and I will hold you accountable for their blood. But if you warn a wicked man and he does not turn from his wickedness and his wicked way, he will die in his iniquity, but you will have saved yourself”. (Ezekiel 3: 17-19)
Nicholas Murphy said…
Scojec is merely an opinionated blogger and not an authoritative source.
Fred Martinez said…
I agree that Francis traditionalist Skojec who follows the talking points of liberal like you is wrong and so are all the liberals. You and they can't give a reasonable agrument so you throw out red herrings because you have no authoritative sources or arguments.
Debbie said…
Since I am blocked by Dr. Marshall, I will ask it here.

Fr. Nix is a public BiP priest, so naturally one would assume/expect him to commemorate BXVI at the Te Igitur in his Masses. Question for Dr. Marshall, if you're reading this: did you check with father who he commemorated at the Mass you served at last August? You posted on social media about this private Mass, but you also told me and countless others on Twitter (before blocking me) that it was our duty to find out. Did you doctor, find out beforehand? If not, why not? Or did you find out afterwards? And if father did, as I strongly suspect, commemorate BXVI, was that an act of schism on your part?

Please know Dr. Marshall, this isn't so much to attack you as it is to get the word out to your followers who you may have scandalized in your infamous tweet earlier this year. A public error requires a public apology.

And Fr. Nix, I ask you, if Dr. Marshall refuses to answer, might it be your duty to clear this up? I certainly do not wish to be blocked by you....but since you and the doctor frequently put podcasts out in public, it causes Catholics such as myself to wonder what to believe in this current papal crisis.

Personally, I don't believe the BiP's can be aligned with Catholics who condemn our position. Certainly we can be friendly with those who are still fearful of our position, but not with those who mock and ridcule.

St. Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Virgin of Revelation, protect us.

AveMarua said…
Why is there any mention of Steve Skojec? He is an ill-informed blogger whose posts are largely painfully absurd. He should not be brought in to any serious conversation on any matter related to the Catholic Church.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk