Skip to main content

Were the Sacrilegious Naked "Saint" Images part of a Vatican Demonic Santeria Ritual?

Francis apologist Austen Ivereigh claims the two statues of naked pregnant women in the Francis Vatican ritual were the Blessed Virgin Mary and St. Elizabeth.

If this is true then it is a sacrilege. It would be sacrilegious to depict the two holy women in bikinis and more so naked.

Even worst if that is even possible, I am sickened to say that anyone familiar with Latino culture and with it's "botanica" occult shops that this Francis Vatican ritual appears to be the demonic Santeria in which saint images are used as a mask to worship pagan energies or gods.

Catholic apologist and Santeria expert Jesse Romero said:

"Shout it from the rooftops: 'Santeria is demonic and Catholicism is the one true religion.' This hybrid is superstitious and deadly to your soul."
(Jessseromero.com, "Catholicism & Santeria... Can you do Both," July 11, 2017)

The Vatican ritual, also, appears to have had specifically South American indigenous superstitious pagan ceremonies.

In the Vatican Amazonian indigenous ritual the most important part of the ritual apparently was the prolonged rattle ceremony that is explained by the website Ayahuasca.com which is "a multi-disciplinary project devoted to the... Amazon":

"[R]attles are the most important [indigenous pagan] shamanic tool in the Amazon... anthropologist Jacques Chaumeil says that, among the Yagua, the rattle is held to be voice of the spirits."
(Ayahuasca.com, "The Leaf-Bundle Rattle, July 22, 2016)

Moreover, the indigenous pagan "Shamanic Drumming" website says:

The shaman's rattle is used to invoke the assistance of power animals and helping spirits... In South America, the shaman's rattle is a most sacred instrument... the rattle's head-gourd, which contains spirits. Joining the head of the rattle to the handle symbolizes the joining of masculine and feminine elements in the universe, an act of fertilization that bestows the sound of instruments creative shamanic power."
(ShamanicDrumming.com "The Shaman's Rattle," April 20, 2014)

It appears that the other meaning of the Vatican ritual was apparently a type of pagan fertility ceremony (remember the two naked pregnant women) as well as a ceremony for a witch doctor or shaman "to invoke... [pagan] animal spirits and helping spirits."

Pray this prayer for all within the walls of the Vatican:

St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle. Be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil. May God rebuke him, we humbly pray. And do thou, O Prince of the Heavenly Host, by the power of God, thrust into hell Satan and all the evil spirits who wander through the world for the ruin of souls. Amen.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.




Comments

Kathleen1031 said…
From here on out anyone who sees nothing wrong with this pope and where the church is, is being willfully ignorant. Of course that was a pagan ritual and he BLESSED it by his papal presence and by his actual blessing. He presided over a ritual where pagan idols were worshipped (when the believers knelt down) to worship gods which were NOT the Virgin Mary nor St. Elizabeth. Austin Ivereigh is doing the devil's work here, I don't know what high position he's got in mind for himself but he's reserving a hot place in hell with his defending the indefensible. No one should represent Our Lady or St. Elizabeth naked, and what about the fertility god on the blanket, the one with the very erect PENIS? It can be seen in a wider shot of the debacle.
Friends, this is satanic, Santeria surely, and Catholics can have nothing to do with it.
Our pope has proven his apostasy and his desire to take the entire church into hell with himself. DON'T GO!
Kathleen1031 said…
It needs to be clarified that Catholics do not worship anyone besides God, Our Lord Jesus Christ, we venerate Our Lady and St. Elizabeth and other saints but we do not ever worship anyone except God. These poor souls used by the pope and the church have not been taken out of pagan worship, it is more useful to our Catholic leadership to leave them in pagan ignorance, because the men who run this church do NOT believe in salvation, Christ, his life, suffering death as a redemptive act for mankind. We do. Keep the faith friends, and remember what God told us in Galatian 1:8.
Fr PJM said…
Not the most important issue here, but: "worship" is an analagous term, and can be used to mean "honour" as in a superior but fellow creature, or it can mean the ADORATION given to the Creator and Lord, alone.
Tradstew said…
It is no longer "the smoke of satan has entered the Church". It IS the flames of hell has engulfed the people occupying our Catholic Church.
BrotherBeowulf said…
Vigil, Feast of the Most Holy Rosary

One clarification, K1031.

He’s certainly not our pope. He’s not pope at all. Rather, Antipope Francis is The False Pope prophesied at Fatima as leading the people into a church of Hell—that’s Francis.
Kathleen1031 said…
BrotherB, I'm with you, completely, but when I hear this I often wonder what we are supposed to do when 95% of the church thinks he is, and they own Rome, every church building, all the titles, have all the money, etc. I do wonder if we are just in denial, and finding a way to live there, or what we are supposed to do with that.
I am leaning toward fighting them, with everything we have, and never giving up. I feel as if saying he is not pope is giving in and nothing will be gained from it except more lost souls and ultimate defeat.
BrotherBeowulf said…
As Pius Xth (St. Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto) reasoned in 1904 against the French, we don’t need no stinking property. I paraphrase.

As St Thomas Aquinas said in answer to our Lord in 1274 just before he died: “Nothing but Thyself, O Lord.”

Our Lord made everything. The Homosexual Network Strangling the Church can have all the buildings & all the money. We choose Our Lord. That’s all we need to do.

And Our Lady!

Happy Feast of the Most Holy Rosary! Francis is nothing compared to the Turk.
BrotherBeowulf said…
Belloc on a Pilgrim:


He served his god so faithfully and well
That now he sees him every day—in Hell.

So, 95% of the Church better wake up before they follow Antipope Francis to his master.

In Hell.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk