Skip to main content

It's not about Child/Parent Separation, but Child Abuse, Smuggling & possibly Sex Trafficking by Parents handing their Children to "Human Smugglers" & Drug Cartels

Most Americans don't realize how dangerous and corrupt the Mexican border towns are:

When I visited a Mexican border town about 8 years ago to visit a relative of a in-law, the town mayor had just been killed probably by the local Mexican drug cartel.

A friend and relative of mind were attacked and beaten by the border townspeople when they protested about being cheated. Luckily, the Mexican police arrested them and they were able to bribe their way back to the USA.

Even Wikipedia admits that those who traffic in bringing people over the borders called "Coyotes" or "human smugglers" have a "growing association with drug cartels."

What kind of parents would allow their children to be involved with "human smugglers" and drug cartels or hand them over to them?

Yesterday,  DHS Secretary Kirsten Nielsen told Breitbart:

""10,000 of the 12,000 [ children "in the care of HHS right now"] were sent here alone by their parents."

If anyone in the US handed their children over to "human smugglers" and drug cartels, they would be arrested for child abuse.

Child abuse is when parents or caregivers through actions or failing to act, causes injury, death, emotional harm or risk to the underaged boy or girl.

Freedomoutpost.com, today, noted:

The "footage recently released by the HHS...[is]  only boys ages 10 and up. Where are the girls?"

What do drug cartels do besides sell drugs and do human smuggling?

Prostitution is usually another business of drug cartels.

What kind of child abusing parents would hand over their sons and daughters to "human smugglers" and drug cartels who possibly are, also, dealing in sex trafficking and prostitution?

"Where are the girls?"

Pray an Our Father now for the poor children of such parents.



Comments

Kathleen1031 said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

non veni pacem (Mark Docherty) Prevost appoints Cupich to join McCarrick roomie Farrell at the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State

non veni pacem (Mark Docherty) Prevost appoints Cupich to join McCarrick roomie Farrell at the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia and  for the restoration of the Church. Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet. Conclave Notes: Has the Trad Media fallen into a COVID-like mass formation with Leo XVI? While it's humorous to see the former anti-Francis Trad pundits suddenly acting like teen age girls infatuated with Leo, it could lead to a Trojan Horse ...

LifeSite: "Prevost’s reported support...allowing divorced & civilly 'remarried'...to receive Holy Communion": “Whoever…helps...promulgation of heresy…is suspected of heresy.” --Canon 2316, Code of Canon Law (1917-1982)

“Whoever…willingly and knowingly helps in the promulgation of heresy…is suspected of heresy.” --Canon 2316,  Code of Canon Law (1917-1982) Trump congratulates Pope Leo XIV on being named first American pontiff ... .. .  While Prevost’s election to the papacy is sure to gladden a number of Americans, and  the cardinal has been  seen  as a “compromise candidate” for the papacy by the College of Cardinals, his history indicates that he may continue the heterodox positions of Pope Francis.  This includes, significantly, Prevost’s  reported  support of the practice of  allowing divorced and civilly “remarried” Catholics to receive Holy Communion without repentance. [ https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trump-congratulates-pope-leo-xiv-on-being-named-first-american-pontiff/?utm_source=featured-news&utm_campaign=catholic] Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. Pray an Our Father now for ...