Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
I see today more geopolitics with something more mystical of the Kabbalistic view between the Israel-Palestine conflict. The U.S., especially, has always been blackmailed into doing the Israelite will, which is to fulfill this messianic and prophetic mission of theirs.
And Netanyahu today will not back down from destroying Israel's enemies for the construction of the Third Temple, even at the cost of more than 25,000 innocent victims, many of whom were children, but who continue to be killed in the Gaza Strip. All of Israel's allies who voted for a ceasefire in Gaza will be punished for it.
Because this has always happened against those who do not defend the continuity of the agenda In the example of the Kennedys with this to this day, the current presidential candidate who has as his slogan "Israel first".
All the events in the past in Dallas up until the destruction of the Towers were always about this dark agenda.