Skip to main content

So, today's Blessed, according to Catholic Online, "successfully led the opposition to an antipope," did he? Wouldn't that make him a schismatic or a heretic, as those terms are being thrown around these days?

So, today's Blessed, according to Catholic Online, "successfully led the opposition to an antipope," did he?  Wouldn't that make him a schismatic or a heretic, as those terms are being thrown around these days?

-----

Bl. Alvarez of Corova
Catholic Online Saints & Angels
Facts
Feastday: February 19
Birth: 1350
Death: 1430
Beatified: September 22, 1741, Saint Peter's Basilica, Papal States by Pope Benedict XIV
Author and Publisher - Catholic Online
Printable Catholic Saints PDFs
Shop Bl. Alvarez of Corova
Alvarez was born in either Lisbon, Portugal, or Cordova, Spain. He entered the Dominican convent at Cordova in 1368. He became known for his preaching prowess in Spain and Italy, was confessor and adviser of Queen Catherine, John of Gaunt's daughter, and tutor of King John II in his youth. He reformed the court, and then left the court to found a monastery near Cordova. There the Escalaceli (ladder of heaven) that he built became a center of religious devotion. He successfully led the opposition to antipope Benedict XII (Peter de Luna), and by the time of his death was famous all over Spain for his teaching, preaching, asceticism, and holiness. His cult was confirmed in 1741."
https://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=332#:~:text=Bl.%20Alvarez%20of,confirmed%20in%201741


Comments

Anonymous said…
The Catholic scruple is demanding of itself in the spiritual life because it is susceptible or delicate to the extreme. When he steps on the ground and if he wants to, he breaks a small cross, he worries about it because he thinks he will receive eternal damnation.

Many are so out of concern about what others might think about if they say Bergoglio is an antipope. They are afraid of being labeled as sedevacantists as an irrational and crazy gesture. Today's sedevacantism is, according to an Apostolic Constitution of a canonically accepted and elected Pope, not ideological and without the faith of some.

A good example for not accepting this misconception is a parish priest named Ramon Guidetti in Italy. Everything he went through after a homily for telling the truth, but was later expelled, excommunicated, in short, he lost everything. 'Cause he wasn't a mercenary, according to some silent prelates or other talkative prelates who even insinuate a parallel Church as a solution to today's crisis, but the same priest simply imitated the Good Shepherd of souls.

All Catholics should be committed to the truth. But, unfortunately, to this day there are few who have understood this.
Ivanmijeime said…
Dear Fred,
From my brother, dear friend and namesake Seán I got this correction of the information above:

"Blessed Alvarez of Cordova (1350–1430) was an Iberian Dominican - born either in Lisbon, Portugal or Cordova, Spain (both Catholic countries claim him) - an ascetic and preacher and contemporary of Saint Vincent Ferrer, O.P. (1350-1419). Bl. Alvarez is renowned for his personal holiness and spiritual support of the people of Spain in the final stages of La Reconquista (that commenced with the Spanish victory at the Battle of Covadonga in 718 and continued until the fall of the Emirate of Granada, 02 January 1492) and his tireless efforts to oppose a schismatic antipope during the Western Schism.

The antipope in question, Pedro Martínez de Luna y Pérez de Gotor (25 November 1328 – 23 May 1423), known as el Papa Luna in Spanish and Pope Luna in English, was an Aragonese nobleman who, as Benedict XIII, is considered an antipope by the Roman Catholic Church. The last official antipope of the RCC is Felix V (1383-1451), whose claim to the triple tiara ended in 1449.

Pope Benedict XII, Jacques Fournier (1285-1342), on the other hand, is incorrectly maligned as an antipope in the hyperlinked Catholic Monitor article and was, in fact, a rather high-minded Cistercian monk who, as Bishop of Pamiers prior to his quite surprising election to the Papacy, took severe measures to repress the gnostic heretical Cathars in southern France, a policy he continued throughout his papacy which culminated in the eradication of Catharism by 1350.

From Wikipedia:

“From the beginning of his pontificate, Benedict worked to reform the Curia and secular clergy in an effort to curb clerical avarice and nepotism as well as abuses in the granting of benefices. However, the religious orders were the primary target of his major reform efforts. By 1335-1336, Benedict had enacted changes that are viewed as one of the milestones of his pontificate.”

Nuestra Señora de Covadonga, ruega por nosotros. "

May our good Lord almighty God bless you, protect you and lead you.

Ivan

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...