Infovaticana: "The gala of..Dolan..a prince of the Church could condone that irreverent coven, how he could smile at an actress 'disguised' as the Virgin Mary with her chest 'pierced' by swords, is something that escapes us"
May 8, 2018 — Cómo podía un príncipe de la Iglesia condonar ese aquelarre irreverente, cómo podía sonreír ante una actriz 'disfrazada' de Virgen María con ...
...But what makes this parade of irreverence newsworthy is the smiling presence among the audience at the gala of the Cardinal Archbishop of New York, Timothy Dolan. How a prince of the Church could condone that irreverent coven, how he could smile at an actress 'disguised' as the Virgin Mary with her chest 'pierced' by swords, is something that escapes us.
Perhaps the cardinal does not realize how painful it must be for his faithful to see him applauding such a masquerade. [Pero lo que que convierte ese desfile de irreverencia en noticioso es la presencia sonriente entre el público de la gala del Cardenal Arzobispo de Nueva York, Timothy Dolan. Cómo podía un príncipe de la Iglesia condonar ese aquelarre irreverente, cómo podía sonreír ante una actriz ‘disfrazada’ de Virgen María con el pecho ‘atravesado’ por espadas, es algo que se nos escapa.
Quizá no advierta el cardenal lo penoso que debe ser para sus fieles verle aplaudiendo semejante mascarada]
Pero lo que que convierte ese desfile de irreverencia en noticioso es la presencia sonriente entre el público de la gala del Cardenal Arzobispo de Nueva York, Timothy Dolan. Cómo podía un príncipe de la Iglesia condonar ese aquelarre irreverente, cómo podía sonreír ante una actriz ‘disfrazada’ de Virgen María con el pecho ‘atravesado’ por espadas, es algo que se nos escapa.
Quizá no advierta el cardenal lo penoso que debe ser para sus fieles verle aplaudiendo semejante mascarada, aunque desde fuera parece el despliegue esperable como reflejo de estos tiempos de confusión y división doctrinal dentro de la Iglesia. Una Iglesia que esta semana pasada el Papa nos decía querer «apartada del dinero y del poder», aunque difícilmente puede hallarse tal concentración de dinero y poder como en la gala de marras.
Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ? On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace. The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Comments