Skip to main content

Dr. E. Michael Jones Defends the Idea that “Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God” — Contra McAtee & Friends

Dr. E. Michael Jones Defends the Idea that "Christians and Muslims ...

Dan Brannan When Papists claim on one hand that Protestantism was actually an Islamic movement, or a Jewish movement, and on the other, that Islam and Christianity worship the same God all I can think is that they are speaking with a Talmudized tongue, themselves. E Michael Jones responds to Bret Monotheists worship ipso facto the same God.

Comments

Anonymous said…
But by that logic neither do Jews, whose new religion depicts Jesus as boiling in feces in hell. He who has not the Son has not the Father.
8:04 AM
Anonymous said…
When we blame the Jews, it doesn't mean that all Jews are to blame. In the same hypothesis, we can conclude that: if we report on the Chinese mafia, it does not mean that we report on all Chinese. The problem is to generalize everyone or someone, even though it's not everyone or someone.

When the human being sincerely seeks the transcendent, he does so by natural law in the face of ignorance in himself for the truth that is not yet manifested. We can see the example of St. Paul who "stood in the midst of the Areopagus, and said: 'Men of Athens, in all things I see you very religious. As I walked through the city and considered the monuments of your worship, I also found an altar with this inscription: To an unknown God. What you adore without knowing it, I proclaim to you! (Acts 17:22-23).'"

True dialogue in the face of circumstances in the world is always to use the Pauline example above. That is to say, the Catholic must recognize that charity is synonymous with truth, even though the same truth is not always pleasant. It is not to be intolerant of everyone or anyone, like the Jews who first observed this same St. Paul on his visit to the Areopagus, and then arrested and killed him, always maliciously influencing the State against the Catholic Faith. By the way, we remember that the Church has always been tolerant of everyone.

The link I can't get to access it, but the comment is in the context forth in this short paragraph quoted above.
3:23 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more