Skip to main content

"Abp. Vigano: 'Too many commentators are more worried about papal doctrine than souls, so they prefer to be governed by an apostate pope rather than recognizing that he cannot head a church to which he does not belong, so they split hairs.'[6:00]"


....Abp. Vigano: Too many commentators are more worried about papal doctrine than souls, so they prefer to be governed by an apostate pope rather than recognizing that he cannot head a church to which he does not belong, so they split hairs. They [6:00] - Canon 212

Comments

Anonymous said…
Archbishop Viganò says that humanly there is no solution on Bergoglio. If he sees humanly the things of God, then he sees the things of God without faith. It is the same mistake of the Jews who rejected the Faith in the Mosaic Law by mere human precepts. This means the same Gnostic hostility to moral rules and precepts on the part of Jews who had been corrupted in the past in captivity in Babylon and Egypt. Therefore, the Domini Universi Gregis is rejected because it is maliciously canonically elaborated by a pope. And the better future of the Church, according to Viganò himself, practically no longer exists.
Anonymous said…
If someone claims that the pope is an apostate, then that same person claims that he is not a Catholic. When someone says that a pope is not a Catholic, then that very person means that the pope has not been canonically elected. Because the prudent Catholic knows that to go against this path is to go against the Dogma of Papal Infallibility. And this question is thus rational and not by "canonical speculation. Because Bergoglio was elected to hold the Petrine office; Ratzinger, however, had not abdicated the same Petrine office. The conclusion, therefore, is revealed to be canonical. The Universi Dominici Gregis speaks of canon 332,2 in order to be valid for abdication of the Petrine office if it is not ordinary, through the death of a pontiff, thus leaving the Chair of St. Peter vacant. The See of Rome is vacant today not because of a probable ideological speculation, but because of a real evidence that has not yet been canonically resolved.
Anonymous said…
Both Bergoglio and Viganò have something similar: contempt for canon law. The latter despises her for a canonical solution to the crisis of the Church and cares little about founding a seminary without canonical recognition, while the other cares little that he is not pope and has expelled a conversational bishop, without authority and without canonical justification. Today there is a dualism, that is, apparently opposite agents; but both are one and the same that bring the same disobedience and ruin to souls. Because all this turns out to be a struggle between good and evil, but in fact this is a dialectic to conclude something empty and dark. It is known to all that Christ founded his one Church and placed Peter at the head whose gates of winter cannot destroy it. But both Viganò and Bergoglio are seeking another identity for the church. Therefore, the See of Rome is vacant today because there is no search for a new elected pope because a canonical solution is disregarded. Only the few Catholics who have faith have canonically rescued the Church.

Popular posts from this blog

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

Has the Trad Media fallen into a COVID-like mass formation with "the Uncola or 'UnFrancis'" Leo XVI? While it's humorous to see the former anti-Francis Trad pundits suddenly acting like teen age girls infatuated with Leo, it could lead to a Trojan Horse effect

May 2023-Cardinal Robert Prevost Honorary Doctorate from the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo (USAT). Posted by Elizabeth Yore... ... Frankly, it’s shocking and inconceivable that a newly elected pontiff would cite as his guiding light the theology of Joseph Bernardin, a known sexual predator and radical collaborator of Marxist and community activist, Saul Alinsky... ... Bernardin and the Alinsky... gave birth to the moral relativism of Bernardin’s seamless garment religion, which is referenced in Prevost’s speech. Prevost espouses the “seamless garment” radical ideology of Cardinal Joseph Bernardin , former Archbishop of Chicago. It is long overdue that American Catholics wake up about the real Joseph Bernardin . [ https://www.yorechildren.com/blog/2025/5/20/the-chicago-way] It is difficult to capture all the arresting insights of Desmet’s rewarding book, which includes the startling claim that [COVID] tyrannical leaders are, very often,  themselves  captive t...