Skip to main content

The Decline & Fall of the Evil Covid Empire as well as "A Deeper Dive Into the CDC Reversal" & "What was the Point?"

 A Deeper Dive on CDC's Exit Strategy • Children's Health Defense

A Deeper Dive Into the CDC Reversal

A Deeper Dive Into the CDC Reversal
theepochtimes.com

The Decline and Fall of Soviet Empire: Forty Years That Shook The World,  From Stalin to Yeltsin: Coleman, Fred: 9780312168162: Amazon.com: Books

The Decline & Fall of the Soviet COVID Empire: "It's Over: CDC Says People Exposed To COVID No Longer Need To Quarantine... In Bureaucrat speak, this is a near-complete Cave-in"

What’s Really Going On With China’s Coronadoom Policy In Shanghai?

... We all saw the propaganda videos at the beginning of the man-made coronadoom panic, which were obvious BS. It is natural to suppose we’re seeing the same thing again: government-directed propaganda to get the world to re-panic, just as it is inclined to calm down. After all, China rigorously controls its internet, so the pictures and videos it allows out might be managed.

Yet this doesn’t have that feel. And as good as China’s control is, it is not total. Too many videos are coming out. Here’s a long thread of them. Of course, the Chinese might be purposely allowing these “leaks”, for the same propaganda purposes, leveraging midwit dupes in Western media.- Renowned statistician William Briggs [https://www.wmbriggs.com/post/39640/]

In his article A Deeper Dive Into the CDC Reversal, The Epoch Time's Jeffrey Tucker reported on the decline and fall of the Evil COVID Empire and the CDC’s almost humorous ending of the Covid Empire while not admitting that that’s what it’s doing:

It would have been fascinating to be a fly on the wall in the brainstorming sessions that led to this little treatise. The wording was chosen very carefully, not to say anything false outright, much less admit any errors of the past, but to imply that it was only possible to say these things now. 

“As SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, continues to circulate globally, high levels of vaccine- and infection-induced immunity and the availability of effective treatments and prevention tools have substantially reduced the risk for medically significant COVID-19 illness (severe acute illness and post–COVID-19 conditions) and associated hospitalization and death. These circumstances now allow public health efforts to minimize the individual and societal health impacts of COVID-19 by focusing on sustainable measures to further reduce medically significant illness as well as to minimize strain on the health care system, while reducing barriers to social, educational, and economic activity.

In English: everyone can pretty much go back to normal. Focus on illness that is medically significant. Stop worrying about positive cases because nothing is going to stop them. Think about the bigger picture of overall social health. End the compulsion. Thank you. It’s only two and a half years late.

[...]

All of this gives rise to the great question: what was the point? Maybe it was all a mistake and now it is gone forever but that’s unlikely. The intellectuals who pushed this project on the world have a view of the world that is fundamentally ill-liberal. They differ among themselves on the details but the general approach is technocratic central planning rooted in deep suspicion of basic tenets of freedom.

How many people on the planet have now been acculturated to top-down control, socialized to live in fear, accept whatever comes down from above, never to question an edict, and expect to live in a world of rolling man-made disasters? And was that the point after all, to cultivate low expectations for life on earth and relinquish the soul’s desire for a full and free life? [https://www.theepochtimes.com/a-deeper-dive-into-the-cdc-reversal_4664340.html]

What was the point?

The Chinese and globalists may have used it for four purposes:

- To end specifically protests that were against terrible air pollution which were in my opinion a backhanded attack on the Chinese totalitarianism. Wuhan is maybe its top industrial and financial city that is known since Tiananmen to be anti-totalitarian.

- Possibly to concoct the virus scare to not just stop protests movements against the totalitarian regime and maybe under the cover of the dragonian lockdowns to kill thousands of Wuhan protesters with the coronavirus cover. They are more than capable of doing such things as Tiananmen proves.

- Coincidentally,
the Chinese probably top industrial city, Wuhan, is firing up just as its top Western economic competitors have shutdown their economies and have no social distancing nor apparently do they have masks.


- Finally, it appears that the globalists such as Bill Gates and collaborators like Francis are using it to push socialistic totalitarianism in the West under the guise of saving people from the Black Plague coronavirus. And as a cherry on the top of the whole possible flim-flam, Gates gets to make billions of dollars on his vaccines which are being pushed by his collaborator Fauci. - Catholic Monitor

On the Evil COVID Empire, you could not have had two more different perspectives than China expert Steven Mosher and One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec.

Mosher has been against the Communist Chinese-like lockdowns and has constantly said COVID-19 is no where close to being like the Black Plague.

While Skojec has been one of the biggest promoters of totalitarian lockdowns and banning of the Mass because he apparently believes the conspiracy theories that there might be "65 million" to a couple of million deaths due to the coronavirus which pro-abortion eugenicist Michael Savage and space alien believer Alex Jones started pushing in January as well as Bill Gates collaborator Anthony Fauci on the lower prediction numbers of a couple of million deaths in the United States which he started pushing a bit later.

Before getting into why a theory of Mosher may be wrong, I want to say that he is one of the top pro-life leaders in the United States.

When I interviewed him so as to write an article for the San Francisco Faith, some years ago, I found him to be so deeply insightful that I wrote one chapter on him and his pro-life work in my book "Hidden Axis."

The great pro-life leader Fr. Paul Marx and his close colleague Ginny Hitchcock who I am honored to call a friend thought he was and is one of the top pro-life leaders in the world.

That said, I think Mosher's theory that he proposed in a LifeSiteNews article that Wuhan's coronavirus death toll is "20 times higher than [the] official count" is speculation at best.

The reason that I wrote about this in 2020 is because in his One Peter Five podcast Skojec linked to Mosher's theory in that LifeSiteNews piece to promoted his call to continue banning of the Mass and totalitarian lockdowns for months more because he seems to equate this virus to a type of Black Plague.

Conjecturally, Mosher because there is evidence that many thousands may have died in Wuhan is "suggesting" that those many thousands were "COVID-19 deaths 20 times higher than [the] official count."

This allowed people like Skojec who wanted to continue banning the Mass and having lockdowns for months to claim we need the Communist-like lockdowns because see the China expert says that there were many more thousands of deaths due to the virus in Wuhan.

Mosher in the article said there were "perhaps 50,000" deaths due to the virus. This is pure speculation. First, he used the word "perhaps" which shows he knows this is speculation. Moreover, even if there were "50,000" deaths how can he possibly know that those deaths were due to the virus.
(LifeSiteNews, "Evidence from Wuhan's morgues, crematoriums suggests COVID-19 deaths 20 times higher than official counts, April 6, 2020)

The answer is the article presents zero solid evidence that those "perhaps" deaths were caused by the COVID.

He as a good China expert knows and says that the Chinese Marxist regime lies.

I totally agree with him.

But, just because they lie it doesn't prove those deaths were COVID deaths.

Mosher should know that just a few months before these thousands of deaths that there were:

"Thousands of citizens in Wuhan" protesting, but strangely, unlike the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak in which there were many videos supposedly showing a out of control Wuhan pandemic which Alex Jones and Skojec showed earlier in the years, in the summer in the Wuhan protests where there were "[v]ideos and photos of the crowded streets and clashes between the protesters and police [the "[v]ideos and photos" were] censored within hours."
(BBC, "Wuhan protests: Incinerator plan Sparks Mass unrest, July 8, 2019)

Why did the Communist censors allow videos into the West of the Wuhan outbreak and so totally blackout all the Wuhan protest videos?

Is it possible that there was a real coronavirus normal non-earthshaking outbreak which the Marxist regime flim-flamed its major economic competitors in the West into believing was a new Black Plague that required the shutdown of their economies just as China's economy restarted?

Pointedly, those places that know China best such as Taiwan, South Korea and Hong Kong didn't shutdown their economies while having the most success at containing the coronavirus of any block of countries.

Moreover, where the Communist once had protest movements against their totalitarianism in Hong Kong and Wuhan there are no more protests.

Mr. Mosher as a China expert don't you know that in the Tiananmen Square protests the "death toll 'was 10,000'" and also during the "Tiananmen Square protests, students in Wuhan blocked the Yangtze River Railway and another 4,000 gathered at the railway station."
(BBC, Tiananmen Square protests death toll 'was 10,000'" December 23, 2017 and Wikipedia, "Wuhan")

Why couldn't those thousands of "perhaps 50,000" deaths have been the thousands who protested in the summer Wuhan protests?

The only evidence I have is that it is a historical fact that the Chinese Communist have done it before.

I want to say that much of the above piece is an attempt to connect dots which was greatly assisted by biotech scientist Dr. Ayyaddural Shiva's analysis of many of the global players in this crisis as well as his science analysis of the coronavirus implications.

Dr. Shiva, one of the inventors of email, and I both appear to think that the virus is a normal viral outbreak that happens such as the flu outbreak that killed 80,000 a few years ago that's being promoted as a kind of Black Plague for political and financial purposes.

The Chinese and globalists may have used it (I am speculating, but with some evidence in a reasonable and coherent analysis) for four purposes:

- To end specifically protests that were against terrible air pollution which were in my opinion a backhanded attack on the Chinese totalitarianism. Wuhan is maybe its top industrial and financial city that is known since Tiananmen to be anti-totalitarian.

- Possibly to concoct the virus scare to not just stop protests movements against the totalitarian regime and maybe under the cover of the dragonian lockdowns to kill thousands of Wuhan protesters with the coronavirus cover. They are more than capable of doing such things as Tiananmen proves.

- Coincidentally, the Chinese probably top industrial city, Wuhan, is firing up just as its top Western economic competitors have shutdown their economies and have no social distancing nor apparently do they have masks.

- Finally, it appears that the globalists such as Bill Gates and collaborators like Francis are using it to push socialistic totalitarianism in the West under the guise of saving people from the Black Plague coronavirus. And as a cherry on the top of the whole possible flim-flam, Gates gets to make billions of dollars on his vaccines which are being pushed by his collaborator Fauci.

 

Comments

T said…
The logic is clear: either the experts are incompetent or evil. No one should listen to them in any case.

If the experts did not account for the opportunity costs when shutting down the world economy they are incompetent. If they were afraid and didn't factor the cost of the models they were using being they are incompetent. If the fact that the flu disappeared from statistics in the same proportion that covid cases were diagnosed--if that did not give them pause for thought--they are incompetent.

I think they are malicious and will cry crocodile tears, pretending to be incompetent. There is plenty of evidence--like China's last Olympic ceremony--that show this was all pre-meditated: to justify everyone requiring a digital id, you needed a vaccine passport; to justify everyone needing a vaccine passport, you needed a vaccine; to justify needing a vaccine, you needed a new normal; to justify a new normal, you needed a virus.
T said…
I mean the 2012 ceremony. Fact checkers say it is not true so you're safe betting it is probably true.

Popular posts from this blog

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk

"The same Globalists who installed Biden... installed the Zelensky regime... [&] those who did not volunteer for this are Literal Human Shields for the Zelensky/Soros government... [if] Trump had survived the election coup in 2020 we would have no Ukraine war"

Above: Ukrainian President Zelensky (2nd from left) and three other men perform a homoerotic skit on Ukrainian television.    What is the Real Agenda of the corrupt Joe & Hunter Biden's Russiagate backing of the Trudeau-like Obama corrupt Ukraine Operatives in their Warmongering Posturing? "If President Trump had survived the election coup in 2020 we would have no Ukraine war (because he respects Russia’s legitimate security interests and wants to disband NATO)." - Scott Lively Constitutional lawyer Scott Lively thinks that the "same globalists who installed Biden... installed the Zelensky regime in Ukraine... [and] those who did not volunteer for this are literal human shields for the Zelensky/Soros government": The use of human shields in warfare of any kind is a horrifying satanic tactic, and, ironically, it is most effective against people who are truly humane. The tactic uses our humanity against us, because we don’t want the innocent t

"I Personally have No Doubt that Obama did in fact Orchestrate the Vatican [Pope Benedict] Coup, a[n]... Obama/Francis Partnership"

Attorney and World Net Daily (WND) contributor Scott Lively believes "that Obama did in fact orchestrate the Vatican [Pope Benedict XVI] coup, and... the Obama/Francis partnership behind the United Nation": Jesuit Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Argentina became Pope Francis in March of 2013. I published  my first article about Pope Francis and the LGBT agenda  on August 1, 2013 when he was in the news for appearing to legitimize the concept of a “gay” identity as innate and unchangeable.  That concept is the false, anti-biblical premise of so-called “Queer Theory” (their term, not mine), a pseudo-scientific invention of “gay” political strategists, which underlies the entire LGBT political agenda. Francis infamously said in a media interview “If a person is gay and seeks the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge that person?”.   I actually defended him against the charge that this statement represented an endorsement of homosexual conduct, and gave him the benefit of t