Do Fauci's "New Emails" reveal "Government-sponsored Suppression of Free Speech" that lead to the Unconstitutional Improprieties of the Biden "Victory"?
CNN Poll: Most Americans feel democracy is under attack in ...
Poll: 70 percent of Republicans don't think the election was ...
Today, The Epoch Times revealed in the post "New Emails Reveal Evidence of Government Efforts to Suppress Free Speech" that emails of Anthony Fauci "rais[e] concerns about government-sponsored suppression of free speech—a direct violation of the 1st Amendment":
A previously unseen Oct. 2020 email from Dr. Francis Collins, the outgoing head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), to his colleague Dr. Anthony Fauci is raising concerns about government-sponsored suppression of free speech—a direct violation of the 1st Amendment.
The email, which appears in a footnote of a Dec. 17 year-end staff report from House Democrats, shows the behind-the-scenes efforts from Collins and Fauci, who were pushing a fresh round of lockdowns, to discredit the Great Barrington Declaration and disparage its authors.
The Great Barrington Declaration was an Oct. 2020 letter that ran counter to the efforts of Fauci and Collins by declaring a unified opposition to broad-based lockdowns, and choosing instead to focus on the protection of vulnerable groups.
That declaration has been signed by many notable medical and epidemiological experts, including Harvard University epidemiologist Dr. Martin Kulldorff, University of Oxford epidemiologist Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Stanford Medical School epidemiologist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, and Nobel Prize laureate Dr. Michael Levitt.
In the email, Collins told Fauci that “this proposal from the three fringe epidemiologists … seems to be getting a lot of attention,” adding that “there needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of its premises. I don’t see anything like that online yet – is it underway?”
Collins’s directive to silence American scientists serves as a chilling reminder of the extent and intensity with which First Amendment rights have been undermined in the pandemic era.
Fauci appears to have been in full agreement with Collins’s proposal to take down the authors and their declaration, sending a one-line reply, “I am pasting in below a piece from the Wired that debunks this theory.” The article was essentially an op-ed castigating the declaration but lacking in any fundamental scientific rebuttal. [https://www.theepochtimes.com/new-emails-reveal-evidence-of-government-efforts-to-suppress-free-speech_4171310.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2021-12-22&mktids=f9a1fe9508e71490beb69882270ae706&est=TpiYfUwFOtV7h1sKw0RBSpzq1UHEuC91r85E3bY6Rh4ehmeR9raJMNSVX5Bl]
Prominent financier Conrad Black, who was one of the leading newspaper publishers in the world, showed that an apparent Fauci suppression of free speech for the legitimatizing of the Covid was needed for the "Democrats and their media allies [to] seized at once on the political potential of the coronavirus" to bring about the unconstitutional improprieties that made possible an illegitimate "adjudicating [of] legality" Joe Biden "victory":
The Democrats and their media allies seized at once on the political potential of the coronavirus. There was approximately one week of arm-in-arm trans-party solidarity when everyone was “in this together,” following which Trump was mercilessly accused of being “anti-science,” and insensitive to the sufferings of the victims.
First the Democrats, in the declared interest of making it easier for voters to exercise their franchise with the least possible concern about contracting the COVID virus while doing so, focused on six swing states: Arizona. Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and effected extensions of voting times and the admission of ballot harvesting, in which ballots would be sent to everyone on the voters’ list regardless of likely obsolescence of the list, and could be cast with unverifiable accuracy by anyone who produced such a ballot signed by an ostensible voter.
In most cases the alteration to the voting and vote-counting methods in the states were not made by the state legislatures as the Constitution requires, but were decreed on the authority of Democratic governors, adopted in settlements of lawsuits between the parties within the states, or having been adopted by a questionable method or not, were upheld by state courts, generally reliable in partisan terms to sustain the initiatives of the party that appointed the majority of the judges.
Second, new rules were invoked, in some cases observers were expelled, in others the harvested ballots were simply mixed in with conventional ballots and it became impossible to judge the likelihood of any individual ballot to be genuine. And all the measures necessary to flip the fewer than 50,000 votes necessary to win the election were taken to ensure that the Democratic candidate, Joe Biden, won at least Pennsylvania and two of the other swing states assuring his election. (He won all six, but all but Michigan by a combined plurality of less than 153,000 out of about 20 million votes cast in those states. A flip of 46,000 between Arizona, Georgia, and Pennsylvania out of 15.3 million in those states, less than a third of one percent, would have given it to Trump.)
The desired result having been obtained, the third step was that the coequal judicial branch of American government simply abdicated the responsibility of adjudicating the legality of these measures. As usual, Donald Trump did not help himself by his hyperbole: he did not as he claimed, win the popular vote, and having predicted the dangers of ballot harvesting, had inadequate forces on the ground to protect Republican votes, and no plausible legal team to attack the measures by which these drastic changes in the voting and vote counting systems had been adopted.
None of the constitutional arguments was judged on its merits; all were rejected on process grounds. The Supreme Court of the United States seized of a case from Texas and supported by 18 other states against the designated swing states for unconstitutional alterations of voting and vote-counting rules and failure to adhere to the constitutional requirement of fair elections, declared its legal incapacity to rule.
It was a shameful abdication and it was then compounded by an almost
total media assertion that the Trump forces had no grounds to object to
the outcome of the election. This too, is shameful. With over 40 million
harvested ballots and such a close election, no one knows who won. The
anti-Trump forces had their way but a majority of Americans doubt the
legitimacy of the outcome of the election and a majority have a low
opinion of all branches of government and of the media. [https://www.theepochtimes.com/guided-by-trump-hatred-opposition-must-now-answer-for-its-improprieties_4168668.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2021-12-22&mktids=f9a1fe9508e71490beb69882270ae706&est=iaS45mUWbl6wwE6xGWRBo9rNvctqebM7viPSFZAn1%2FatonkOK32m%2BY0hMUpe]
In 2020, constitution expert Kenneth Starr, on the Mark Levin Show, said "what happened in Pennsylvania over these recent weeks is a constitutional travesty." (The Oxford Dictionary defines travesty as "A false, absurd, or distorted representation of something"):
MARK LEVIN: The state’s legislature determine how to select their elections. Is that what the [Constitution section] means?
KEN STARR: That’s exactly what it means. It got lost in the Pennsylvania shuffle. The founding generation sitting in Philadelphia undoubtedly thought, “Well, should we have the state Supreme Court make the determination?” No, we want … a very democratic with a small “d” approach. We want the legislatures, those closest to the people, the state legislatures, they’re the bosses, not the governor. And what happened in Pennsylvania over these recent weeks is a constitutional travesty. Governor Wolf tries to get his reforms, his vision, as he was entitled to do, through the legislature of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He failed. He then goes to the state Supreme Court, which by a divided vote, accepted the substance of what Governor Wolf was doing, and then added thereon nooks and crannies as well. [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/11/09/ken-starr-pennsylvania-mail-in-ballot-extension-a-constitutional-travesty/, https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/travesty and https://nonvenipacem.com/2020/11/10/ken-starr-pa-mail-in-ballot-extension-a-constitutional-travesty/]
"Former United States circuit judge" as well as "39th solicitor general of the United States" Starr was the "independent counsel while Bill Clinton was U.S. president. Starr was initially appointed to investigate the suicide of deputy White House counsel Vince Foster and the Whitewater real estate investments of Bill Clinton."[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Starr]
Newsweek reported that Starr
who is "a professor of constitutional law at Baylor University" said
"to count every vote may be a crime" because it is "illegal" and "unconstitutional":
"Former U.S. Circuit Judge Kenneth Starr told Fox News host Mark Levin that the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court and Governor Tom Wolf made an "unconstitutional decision," claiming many of the votes counted were "illegal."
Starr, who rose to national prominence in the 1990s prosecuting former President Bill Clinton, told Levin Sunday night that Pennsylvania's three-day extension for mail-in ballots was a "constitutional travesty." Levin and Starr both questioned the integrity of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and the state Supreme Court for allowing an emergency order Friday in which every county had to segregate and secure ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day. The order did not prevent election workers from continuing to count the ballots, which Starr claimed were "illegal." [https://www.newsweek.com/ken-starr-says-count-every-vote-may-crime-blasts-pennsylvania-governor-supreme-court-1545892 and https://ballotpedia.org/Kenneth_Starr]
More notes on the Biden "victory":
Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden "victory": "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]
The Epoch Times reported that the FBI Coverup "by fabricating another issue" that was the "Russia Collusion [and "Russia disinformation"] Wasn’t About Donald Trump; It Was Designed to Protect Hillary Clinton" and Joe Biden." [https://www.theepochtimes.com/russia-collusion-wasnt-about-donald-trump-it-was-designed-to-protect-hillary-clinton_3621529.html]
Mathematician Bobby Piton Finds More Than 500,000 Unique Last Names in Pennsylvania: ‘Sophisticated State Actor Was Able to Optimize Desired Outcome [pointed out blatant voter fraud]’ [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mathematician-bobby-piton-finds-500000-unique-last-names-pennsylvania-sophisticated-state-actor-able-optimize-desired-outcome/]
Are the Media and Tucker Carlson Lying that there isn't any Evidence of Voter Fraud? [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/are-media-and-tucker-carlson-blatantly.html?m=1