Skip to main content

Do Fauci's "New Emails" reveal "Government-sponsored Suppression of Free Speech" that lead to the Unconstitutional Improprieties of the Biden "Victory"?

 AP-NORC poll: Most Republicans doubt Biden's legitimacy | AP News

Many Republicans believe Biden won by fraud. That's what they thought in  2012 and 1996, too. - The Washington Post 

CNN Poll: Most Americans feel democracy is under attack in ...

Poll: 70 percent of Republicans don't think the election was ...

Today, The Epoch Times revealed in the post "New Emails Reveal Evidence of Government Efforts to Suppress Free Speech" that emails of Anthony Fauci "rais[e] concerns about government-sponsored suppression of free speech—a direct violation of the 1st Amendment":

A previously unseen Oct. 2020 email from Dr. Francis Collins, the outgoing head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), to his colleague Dr. Anthony Fauci is raising concerns about government-sponsored suppression of free speech—a direct violation of the 1st Amendment.

The email, which appears in a footnote of a Dec. 17 year-end staff report from House Democrats, shows the behind-the-scenes efforts from Collins and Fauci, who were pushing a fresh round of lockdowns, to discredit the Great Barrington Declaration and disparage its authors.

The Great Barrington Declaration was an Oct. 2020 letter that ran counter to the efforts of Fauci and Collins by declaring a unified opposition to broad-based lockdowns, and choosing instead to focus on the protection of vulnerable groups.

That declaration has been signed by many notable medical and epidemiological experts, including Harvard University epidemiologist Dr. Martin Kulldorff, University of Oxford epidemiologist Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Stanford Medical School epidemiologist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, and Nobel Prize laureate Dr. Michael Levitt.

In the email, Collins told Fauci that “this proposal from the three fringe epidemiologists … seems to be getting a lot of attention,” adding that “there needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of its premises. I don’t see anything like that online yet – is it underway?”

Collins’s directive to silence American scientists serves as a chilling reminder of the extent and intensity with which First Amendment rights have been undermined in the pandemic era.

Fauci appears to have been in full agreement with Collins’s proposal to take down the authors and their declaration, sending a one-line reply, “I am pasting in below a piece from the Wired that debunks this theory.” The article was essentially an op-ed castigating the declaration but lacking in any fundamental scientific rebuttal. []

Prominent financier Conrad Black, who was one of the leading newspaper publishers in the world, showed that an apparent Fauci suppression of free speech for the legitimatizing of the Covid was needed for the "Democrats and their media allies [to] seized at once on the political potential of the coronavirus" to bring about the unconstitutional improprieties that made possible an illegitimate "adjudicating [of] legality" Joe Biden "victory":

The Democrats and their media allies seized at once on the political potential of the coronavirus. There was approximately one week of arm-in-arm trans-party solidarity when everyone was “in this together,” following which Trump was mercilessly accused of being “anti-science,” and insensitive to the sufferings of the victims.

First the Democrats, in the declared interest of making it easier for voters to exercise their franchise with the least possible concern about contracting the COVID virus while doing so, focused on six swing states: Arizona. Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and effected extensions of voting times and the admission of ballot harvesting, in which ballots would be sent to everyone on the voters’ list regardless of likely obsolescence of the list, and could be cast with unverifiable accuracy by anyone who produced such a ballot signed by an ostensible voter.

In most cases the alteration to the voting and vote-counting methods in the states were not made by the state legislatures as the Constitution requires, but were decreed on the authority of Democratic governors, adopted in settlements of lawsuits between the parties within the states, or having been adopted by a questionable method or not, were upheld by state courts, generally reliable in partisan terms to sustain the initiatives of the party that appointed the majority of the judges.

Second, new rules were invoked, in some cases observers were expelled, in others the harvested ballots were simply mixed in with conventional ballots and it became impossible to judge the likelihood of any individual ballot to be genuine. And all the measures necessary to flip the fewer than 50,000 votes necessary to win the election were taken to ensure that the Democratic candidate, Joe Biden, won at least Pennsylvania and two of the other swing states assuring his election. (He won all six, but all but Michigan by a combined plurality of less than 153,000 out of about 20 million votes cast in those states. A flip of 46,000 between Arizona, Georgia, and Pennsylvania out of 15.3 million in those states, less than a third of one percent, would have given it to Trump.)

The desired result having been obtained, the third step was that the coequal judicial branch of American government simply abdicated the responsibility of adjudicating the legality of these measures. As usual, Donald Trump did not help himself by his hyperbole: he did not as he claimed, win the popular vote, and having predicted the dangers of ballot harvesting, had inadequate forces on the ground to protect Republican votes, and no plausible legal team to attack the measures by which these drastic changes in the voting and vote counting systems had been adopted.

None of the constitutional arguments was judged on its merits; all were rejected on process grounds. The Supreme Court of the United States seized of a case from Texas and supported by 18 other states against the designated swing states for unconstitutional alterations of voting and vote-counting rules and failure to adhere to the constitutional requirement of fair elections, declared its legal incapacity to rule.

It was a shameful abdication and it was then compounded by an almost total media assertion that the Trump forces had no grounds to object to the outcome of the election. This too, is shameful. With over 40 million harvested ballots and such a close election, no one knows who won. The anti-Trump forces had their way but a majority of Americans doubt the legitimacy of the outcome of the election and a majority have a low opinion of all branches of government and of the media. []

In 2020, constitution expert Kenneth Starr, on the Mark Levin Show, said "what happened in Pennsylvania over these recent weeks is a constitutional travesty." (The Oxford Dictionary defines travesty as "A false, absurd, or distorted representation of something"):

MARK LEVIN: The state’s legislature determine how to select their elections. Is that what the [Constitution section] means?

KEN STARR: That’s exactly what it means. It got lost in the Pennsylvania shuffle. The founding generation sitting in Philadelphia undoubtedly thought, “Well, should we have the state Supreme Court make the determination?” No, we want … a very democratic with a small “d” approach. We want the legislatures, those closest to the people, the state legislatures, they’re the bosses, not the governor. And what happened in Pennsylvania over these recent weeks is a constitutional travesty. Governor Wolf tries to get his reforms, his vision, as he was entitled to do, through the legislature of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He failed. He then goes to the state Supreme Court, which by a divided vote, accepted the substance of what Governor Wolf was doing, and then added thereon nooks and crannies as well. [, and]

"Former United States circuit judge" as well as "39th solicitor general of the United States" Starr was the "independent counsel while Bill Clinton was U.S. president. Starr was initially appointed to investigate the suicide of deputy White House counsel Vince Foster and the Whitewater real estate investments of Bill Clinton."[]

Newsweek reported that Starr who is "a professor of constitutional law at Baylor University" said "to count every vote may be a crime" because it is "illegal" and "unconstitutional":

"Former U.S. Circuit Judge Kenneth Starr told Fox News host Mark Levin that the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court and Governor Tom Wolf made an "unconstitutional decision," claiming many of the votes counted were "illegal."

Starr, who rose to national prominence in the 1990s prosecuting former President Bill Clinton, told Levin Sunday night that Pennsylvania's three-day extension for mail-in ballots was a "constitutional travesty." Levin and Starr both questioned the integrity of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and the state Supreme Court for allowing an emergency order Friday in which every county had to segregate and secure ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day. The order did not prevent election workers from continuing to count the ballots, which Starr claimed were "illegal." [ and]

More notes on the Biden "victory":

Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden "victory": "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" []

The Epoch Times reported that the FBI Coverup "by fabricating another issue" that was the "Russia Collusion [and "Russia disinformation"] Wasn’t About Donald Trump; It Was Designed to Protect Hillary Clinton" and Joe Biden." []

Mathematician Bobby Piton Finds More Than 500,000 Unique Last Names in Pennsylvania: ‘Sophisticated State Actor Was Able to Optimize Desired Outcome [pointed out blatant voter fraud]’ [] 

Are the Media and Tucker Carlson Lying that there isn't any Evidence of Voter Fraud? [

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis's Amoris Laetitia.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost - Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

- Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said "the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church."

- "If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?":

- "Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?":

- If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the"Roman Rite Communities" like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & "Eminent Canonists and Theologians" by "Resist[ing]" him: 

 -  LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"

-  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."

- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes:  

- Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" []

- Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times "Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003":

- Tucker Carlson's Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written" according to Rush:
- A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020:
What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?: and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: "Anitfa 'Agent Provocateurs'":

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God's Will and to do it.
Pray an Our Father now for America.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 |   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul