Hypocrisy: Why Does Voris want to "Expell... Liar" Bp. Fellary for Sex-abuse Cover-up & not Francis for the Very Same Thing?
Michael Voris' Church Militant in a months in the making investigation of some of the leadership of the Society of St. Puis X (SSPX) for its sex abuse cover-ups appears to show strong evidence that Bishop Bernard Fellay was involved in multiple cover-ups.
If the SSPX leaders and Fellay are guilty they should be exposed, expelled, excommunicated and send to prison.
Now, I am waiting for Voris to do a months in the making investigation of Francis and his inner circle leadership's sex-abuse cover-ups. And I'm not talking about phony Church Militant puff pieces such as "Mother Alleges Sex Abuse Cover-Up Under Cdl. Bergoglio" that cover-up as much as they expose Francis' "constant protection" of the clerical gay mafia in Argentina.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
If the SSPX leaders and Fellay are guilty they should be exposed, expelled, excommunicated and send to prison.
Now, I am waiting for Voris to do a months in the making investigation of Francis and his inner circle leadership's sex-abuse cover-ups. And I'm not talking about phony Church Militant puff pieces such as "Mother Alleges Sex Abuse Cover-Up Under Cdl. Bergoglio" that cover-up as much as they expose Francis' "constant protection" of the clerical gay mafia in Argentina.
Why hasn't Church Militant send a reporter or even called the Argentinian Wanderer to expose Francis?
The Catholic Argentinian website the Wanderer on October 23, 2014 posted "Unmasking Bergoglio":
"Bergoglio always had the 'gay agenda' among his plans... It is a question of asking the Buenoairean clergy about the constant protection that he lavished on many homosexual priests."
"Bergoglio always had the 'gay agenda' among his plans... It is a question of asking the Buenoairean clergy about the constant protection that he lavished on many homosexual priests."
Every now and then Voris will mildly say "abusive homosexual bishop like Zanchetta, Piñeda or Maccarone, or a predator priest like Grassi, Inzoli or Corradi... escape criticism from the Pope [Francis]," but never will he say Francis and his inner circle leadership must be exposed, expelled, excommunicated and send to prison if guilty:
"If you are an abusive homosexual bishop like Zanchetta, Piñeda or Maccarone, or a predator priest like Grassi, Inzoli or Corradi, might you feel betrayed if a fellow cleric whom you knew shared your homosexual orientation came out with a statement condemning those who engage in homosexual behavior? Why does a cardinal like Francesco Coccopalmerio, whom multiple sources confirm attended a "drug-fueled homosexual party" in the Vatican, escape criticism from the Pope, who personally made the apartment available to Coccopalmerio's secretary, Msgr. Luigi Capozzi?"
However, Church Militant can call Bishop Bernard Fellay a "big liar" who "needs to be expelled" for sex-abuse cover-up.
Why can't Voris, and his collaborators such as Tim Gordon, Patrick Coffin and Steve Skojec call Francis a "big liar" who "needs to be expelled"?
Don't Voris and his collaborators really care about the victims and are they pedo-protectors when it comes to Francis cover-up victims?
Why don't Francis conservatives and Francis traditionalists support pedo exposure and removal of Francis?
Why don't Francis conservatives and Francis traditionalists support pedo exposure and removal of Francis?
If Francis and his Vatican leadership are guilty they should be exposed, expelled, excommunicated and send to prison.
Is the expose by Church Militant and Christine Niles only about getting rid of corrupt leaders in the SSPX or might there be another agenda?
On April 22, in the Niles' Twitter thread, the apparent friend of Church Militant, Damian Thompson, gave away their seeming long time hidden agenda. Thompson wrote:
"Hard to see how the SSPX can survive this."
On April 22, in the Niles' Twitter thread, the apparent friend of Church Militant, Damian Thompson, gave away their seeming long time hidden agenda. Thompson wrote:
"Hard to see how the SSPX can survive this."
Moreover, it seems a strange coincidence that Voris as well as most of the conservative Catholic and Francis traditionalist media are promoting or sitting on the fence about the coronavirus hysteria narrative with only the traditionalist Catholic media friendly to SSPX opposing the leftist Francis narrative.
It also seems a coincidence that the only Catholics in the United States doing the most for the restoration of Masses are targeted at the exact time that they are the only ones opposing Francis and his Catholic media friends in the Mass bannings.
If Voris is not a hypocrite then he needs to start a months in the making investigation of Francis and his collaborators for their sex abuse scandals and cover-ups.
He might even do a expose of Church Militant, Opus Dei as well as Francis' Vatican and their cover-up of the evidence that the coronavirus hysteria is, as lawyer and journalist Chris Ferrera said, a "monumental fraud."
After Church Militant does its expose of Francis and his collaborators then I will be waiting for one of Voris' Twitter friends to say:
It also seems a coincidence that the only Catholics in the United States doing the most for the restoration of Masses are targeted at the exact time that they are the only ones opposing Francis and his Catholic media friends in the Mass bannings.
If Voris is not a hypocrite then he needs to start a months in the making investigation of Francis and his collaborators for their sex abuse scandals and cover-ups.
He might even do a expose of Church Militant, Opus Dei as well as Francis' Vatican and their cover-up of the evidence that the coronavirus hysteria is, as lawyer and journalist Chris Ferrera said, a "monumental fraud."
After Church Militant does its expose of Francis and his collaborators then I will be waiting for one of Voris' Twitter friends to say:
"Hard to see how Francis and the Catholic Church can survive this."
That appears to be the difference between traditionalists and Francis conservatives like Voris and his Francis traditionalist collaborators. We want Francis and his inner circle to be "expelled" from the Church for the restoration of the Church. They appear to want to destroy the traditionalist SSPX and not restore it.
If Voris and his Francis traditionalists collaborators are successful in destroying the traditionalists in SSPX, will their next target be all the other non-Francis traditionalists who is don't belong to SSPX?
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Comments
Has a phony ring to it.
So, on one side you have CM and some crackerjack reporter named Christine Niles with the most devastating charges you can possibly bring against a Catholic apostolate: systemic sex crimes against the weak and innocent, aided and abetted by the power structure of the apostolate itself who use Sacred Tradition and ancient Liturgy as a cover to increase their chances at remaining hidden in their debauchery. I describe them in a word - campy..
On the other side, you have the SSPX, who stand alone in fidelity to God as the entire Vatican II New Order Catholic Church implodes upon itself in *actual* systemic debauchery, widespread unbelief, idol worship and the overturning of our Sacred patrimony top to bottom. New Order Church is closed up tight as a drum. SSPX is unchanged, offering God to all who attend. SSPX, alone, can boast of seeing the impending apostasy; alone holding firm to Sacred Tradition. In a word - Solid.
I remain open to being persuaded of these charges. But I have seen SSPX up close, personal, and CM is not the ones to persuade me these holy, faithful missionaries of Tradition are deceptive evil personified. Nope, not CM and the Michael Voris show.
Trad Inc. doesn't work for me.
I think for the time being Francis Trad Skojec is more descriptive than Trad Inc Skojec.
If someone can come up with something better. I'm open to it.
If you're a member of Skojec's dwindling fan club I can understand why you don't like Francis traditionalist Skojec.
You could call them "Francis Catholics" I suppose, but that's one thing Francis ain't.
Particularly disappointing is attorney Ferrara, who apparently has decided to betray his former friend and colleague Fr. Gruner.
Let's see what Fr. Gruner says about who the true pope is!
https://fromrome.info/2020/05/24/the-time-to-return-en-masse-to-ancient-roman-rite-has-come/#comments .
Oddly, the SSPX is also fully on board with Francis Antipope. And Antipope Francis likes them too--maybe because with leadership like Fellay, Wenger, Waillez and Schmidberger running cover for childmolesting rapists like convicted pedophile Fr. Abbet and creepy pederast Fr. Angles, well they are easily blackmailable.
And that's a hallmark of Antipope Francis's merry court.
This video is worth 6 and a half minutes of your time. Despite one mistaken, in claiming that Pope Benedict in his Declaratio of February 11, 2013, specifically said “I do not resign the munus,” it is an excellent video that really puts to flight and to shame all Trad Inc. partisans who deny the true pope for the pot of Bergoglian poisoned porridge.
https://vimeo.com/228833627
God bless the valiant Fr. Gruner. May he rest in peace.
Before joining the local SSPX missionary chapel, I interviewed with the Priest to inform him of my Catholic views on this topic, prior to presenting myself for Communion. His response is relevant to your valid concern.
He told me that Sacred Tradition transcends questions about the current Pope. There have been questions in the past and they do not change our responsibility to follow a Tradition as it has been delivered to us. He accepts a variety of views about the Pope, including Sedevecantists. The Papacy is essential to the Church. We must accept the Office in order to be Catholic. Consensus about the current occupant, as important as it may be, is not essential to be Catholic. Disagreements, can and have occurred.
I would consider SSPX to be “fully on board with Antipope Francis” when they place a Pachamama on the High Altar and teach that FrancisMercy ®️ demands admittance of sodomites and adulterers to Holy Communion.
Their approach to the Papacy conflict is the same as mine. I accept the situation is what it is. I acknowledge Bergóglio has been placed on the Seat of Peter. Good Catholics can disagree on what that means (because much of it remains hidden and obscure). He cannot change a punctuation (“jot or tittle”) of Scripture, Dogma or Tradition. Good Catholics can NOT disagree in THAT.
FWIW.
How's about Francis ain't Catholic Skojec?
Trad-ish?
Karen Skojec?