Skip to main content

Is Caregiver Ganswein the one "Manipulating" Benedict with Francis Pulling his Strings?

Does Francis allow anyone who he can't control and doesn't lick his boots to have any real power in his Vatican?

The answer is unequivocally:

NO. PERIOD.

The latest example of this fact is the head of the supposedly all powerful "Old Guard" Cardinal Angelo Sodano who many say controlled to a large extent Pope John Paul II and who even Pope Benedict XVI could only "sideline," but not get rid of.

Francis just got rid of him as if he were a limp, ineffectual rag doll.

Another example is Pope Benedict friend Cardinal Gerhard Muller who was a boot licker of Francis, but despite this because he apparently couldn't completely be controlled was unceremoniously like Sodano tossed out of the Vatican like a rag doll despite being Benedict's friend.

With the two examples above in mind, why do you see "Benedict friend" Archbishop Georg Ganswein who is Francis's Prefect of the Papal household always sitting next to Francis at the Vatican events?

With Ganswein being a Francis boot licker like Muller, but having a Vatican job; why does everyone keep assuming that his loyalty is to Benedict and not to Francis when he has a Vatican job?

Remember the Muller example in which boot licking isn't enough, but being completely under the control of Francis is the magic ticket to keeping ones job in the present Vatican.

Now, Cardinal Robert Sarah is a boot licker like Muller and probably because he is Black has a Vatican job with zero power, but obviously Francis doesn't have 100 percent control over him.

If you had a choice of deciding who is lying about Pope Benedict's contribution to Cardinal Sarah's new book whom would you trust more to tell the truth: Sarah or Ganswein.

As soon as the Sarah book made Benedict not appear to be totally under the control of Francis suddenly Team Francis's "Catholic" and secular media promoted the narrative that Benedict was being "manipulated" by the evil Sarah and others.

Now, who made Sarah look like a "manipulating" lying schemer?

Next, who has the most important job next to Francis in the Vatican who still has a job in the Vatican?

Benedict's caregiver Ganswein who everyone keeps supposing as we are supposed to suppose is not under Francis's control.

Might Team Francis be telling the truth for once?

Is Benedict being "manipulated"?

Might Benedict's caregiver Ganswein be the one "manipulating" Benedict with Francis pulling the strings behind the scenes?

Please pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.





Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
So many theories and conjectures about what has happened since 2012 in the Church ended up being refuted on the testimony of Ganswein. Now that Ganswein has shown that he has serious credibility issues, all those theories need to be restudied. It might be that Ganswein was a Bergoglian agent long before. Remember all those letters of Benedict which were stolen, the copying going unnoticed. They were all conveniently left on the table of Ganswein. If Ganswein was a Berg agent, the entire Renunciation is not put in total doubt, as to who wrote the Declaratio, who gave Benedict canonical advice (Ganswein has a doctorate in canon law), who told the Cardinals it meant the renunication of the papacy? Who forced Benedict to change his mind and resign on Feb. 11 when on Feb. 7 Bertone was telling Gotti he would get his job back at the express order of Pope Benedict. And how precise was Benedict when he told Fellay that he has no authority at the Vatican his authority stops at the threshold of his own office door. Not even at the threshold of his secretary's door? A lot to reanalyze.
BrotherBeowulf said…
Well, Bro. Alexis, Bertone coming back would be enough to get me to resign. Lying scoundrel and thief that he is.

As for Müller I agree craven and generally worthless who was willing to interrupt his own Mass to grovel before Antipope Bergoglio.

Priorities.

Gänswein is completely untrustworthy and as Miss Barnhardt implies would administer the “Cantarella” if Bergoglio like the Borgias so ordered.

It’s as if we’re watching a movie: “Return to Byzantium” perhaps.

Charmaine said…
What was with the rumor a year ago that Bergoglio was going to abolish the Prefecture of the Pontifical Household, i.e. get rid of Msgr. Gänswein? Nothing came of it. http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2019/01/pope-taking-swipe-at-legacy-of-pope.html

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk