Skip to main content

Francis has Betrayed China's Underground Church; & Might he Betray Hong Kong?

Francis's China deal is a cold-blooded betrayal.

Francis is appointing Communist regime operatives as bishops who de facto endorse the Chinese two-child policy of murdering of the unborn babies.

He is cold-bloodedly endorsing the murder of millions of unborn Chinese babies and the betrayal of China's underground Church.

Cardinal Joseph Zen before Christmas said:

"China's underground Church... feels betrayed."
Francis's Vatican has "demanded the retirement of one bishop and the demotion of another" so that Communist totalitarian controlled state bishops can get control of the underground Chinese Church.

The National Review's Michael Dougherty reported what this Vatican betrayal means to the Chinese Catholics in quoting a Chinese underground pewsitter witness to the Communist regime's reign of terror:

"Everybody, and I mean everybody, knows someone who was murdered, or tortured, or disappeared to defend the principle that was just abandoned."
(National Review, "The Vatican's Deal with China: What to make of Cardinal Parolin's Diplomacy," January 23, 2017)

Cardinal Joseph Zen, bishop emeritus of Hong Kong in 2016 said the Francis "diplomacy" is like betraying Joseph, Mary and the baby Jesus to the murderous Herod.

Cardinal Zen said:

"[T]oday would our diplomats advise Joseph to go and humbly beg for dialogue with Herod!"

He betrayed the Chinese underground Church and might he, now, betray Hong Kong?

After all he wants "to go to [Communist] Beijing." On November 29, the South China Morning Post reported that Francis did not "side" with the freedom fighter against the totalitarian regime:

"'It’s not only Hong Kong, there are various problematic situations that I am unable to evaluate at the moment. I respect peace and I ask for peace for all these countries that have problems, Spain too,' he said."

'It is better to put things in perspective and to call for dialogue, for peace, so that problems can be resolved. And finally, I would like to go to Beijing, I love China.'"

Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
Here is a suggestion for a post. Does Burke think that Pope Francis is an extremist.

Burke says that all who doubt Francis is pope are extremists.

But at Panama Youth day, Francis told the crowd, as they looked at a live image of Pope Benedict: There is the Pope, Benedict, say hello to the Pope!
Debbie said…
"all who doubt Francis is Pope are extremists". And exactly when did it become "bad" to be an extremist? As in extremely Catholic? Back in the dau, the Church had another name for them.....Saints!
MEwbank said…
It is never extreme to stand with the truth, but it is always cowardly to not do so.
BrotherBeowulf said…
@MEwbank:

Especially as Christ told us, “I am the way, the truth and the life.” John 14:6.

See Miss Barnhardt on point today. Paraphrasing Augustine: “The Truth is like a lion. You don’t have to defend HIM. Let HIM loose; HE will defend HIMSELF.

And in the opposite corner, Bergoglio, who’s not too big on truth, and his boss, the Father of Lies.

Time to choose up sides.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...