Skip to main content

Is Francis's Pachamama Idolatry, like Morales' Pachamama Worship, part of a "Communist Revolution"?

Lawyer and journalist Nicolas Marquez in his Spanish language book "The Impostor Evo Morales: From the Pachamama to the Narco-State (Google translation from the Spanish)" makes the case that Morales is a "scam" artist who uses his supposed full-blooded indigenousism for propaganda use and indigenous Pachamama worship to bring about a "communist revolution with illegal [drug] money."
("The Impostor," Cover of book)

Marquez in the books says Morales' indigenousism is Marxism:

"[I]ndigenousism (Indigenismo) is nothing more than ideological Neo-Marxism."

The Catholic Monitor is getting the information for this post from a Google pdf on the Internet of the book cover and Index.

One interesting chapter according to the Index is:

"El Islam y la Pachamama"

Morales along with his collaborator Francis appears to be obsessed not just with Pachamama idolatry, but with Islam.

But, getting to the Francis-Morales Pachamama connection, journalist Edward Pentin reported that Francis's Pachamama idolatry in the Vatican was promoted by his apparent close collaborator Morales according to Gloria.tv.

Is Francis's Pachamama idolatry, like Morales' Pachamama worship, part of a communist revolution?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Comments

Aqua said…
Communism is just another front for the real invisible, never ending conflict: God or Satan.

It is a binary choice. This or that. Today it is communism, tomorrow they will call it something else. But at the core, there is either God - or there is pachamama.

So yes, I agree, pachamama and communism are connected.

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul