Skip to main content

Dementia Signs: Pope Francis's Comments on Poop Eating and Priests Caressing Children

Pope Francis's comments on poop eating are now infamous. Many are outraged, but I think the proper response is pity.

Most people don't realize that poop fixation and poop eating are signs of dementia as well as mental illness. To read more on these signs of metal unfitness and other signs of the Pope having dementia click below:

http://allnurses.com/geriatric-nurses-ltc/coprophagia-and-scatolia-768081.html

http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2016/06/four-cardinals-challenge-pope-heresy.html?m=1

Pope Francis like President Reagan needs to say he will resign his office if he is found mentally unfit.


It appears at the very least the Bishops, Cardinals and Catholic media have to ask the Pope to receive a battery of psychological tests. 

At worst they need to ask him to resign for his own good to get the care he needs and for the good of the Church.

Pitifully, Francis's unbalanced comments continued on December 9 when he spoke of "healthy" priests caressing children. He said:

“Once, a person told me what kind of priest a man was by the attitude they had with children: if they knew how to caress a child."[
http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2016/12/09/pope_francis_rigidity,_worldliness_a_disaster_for_priests/1277926]
 

Fr. John Hunwicke speaking on this
comment and others said it best:

"Fr Z also provided a link to a sermon preached by Papa Bergoglio in the Domus Sanctae Marthae. Coming as it does so soon after publication of the Sovereign Pontiff's words about shit-eating, this puerile and unbalanced attack upon those the pope appears to enjoy hating seems to me ... I feel compelled by Canon 212 paragraph 3 and the Holy Father's own often expressed desire for Parrhesia to say this ... to raise disturbing questions about Pope Francis' mind." [http://liturgicalnotes.blogspot.com/2016/12/is-fr-z-important.html?m=1]

Unfortunately, the Pope's unbalanced words have consequences.

It is possible for mentally unfit priests to use Pope Francis's comments on "healthy" priests caressing children to justify sex abuse.


It is possible for these sick clerics to use chapter 8 of "Amoris Laetitia" to justify "irregular relationships" involving children.

Sadly, the logical consequence of the apparent confused teachings of Francis, not just a mentally unfit priest's diseased mind, could lead one to imagine a press conference, using the reductio ad absurdum method of reasoning, where the Pope
 said:

"I was wrong to say that priests that have irregular relationships with children are committing sex abuse and committing mortal sin.

That is not merciful.

These priests may be in a state of grace and they might be able to stay in these irregular relationships and receive Holy Communion, but with discernment and in limited situations.

Amoris Laetitia says those who 'hid[e] behind the Church’s teachings, sitting on the chair of Moses and judging at times with superiority and superficiality.' Therefore,  'it is not enough simply to apply moral laws . . . as if they were stones to throw at people’s lives.'

The priests 'may know full well the rule, yet . . . be in a concrete situation which does not allow him or her to act differently and decide otherwise without further sin' (AL 301).

Remember the difference between objective sin and subjective guilt. Since there are in priests lives 'mitigating factors . . . it can no longer simply be said that all those in any ‘irregularsituation' – such as priests that have irregular relationships with children   – 'are living in a state of mortal sin and are deprived of sanctifying grace' (AL 301).

As I said we 'find it hard to make room for the consciences of the faithful' (AL 37).

The priests 'may know full well the rule, yet . . . be in a concrete situation which does not allow him or her to act differently and decide otherwise without further sin' (AL 301).

'Since ‘time is greater than space,’ I would make it clear that not all discussions of doctrinal, moral or pastoral issues need to be settled by interventions of the magisterium.'(Amoris Laetitia 3).

I understand that the rigorists want black and white rules for priests that have irregular relationships with children and 'I understand those who prefer a more rigorous pastoral care which leaves no room for confusion' (AL 308)."

"In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; or argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument which attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion."[
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul