Skip to main content

In 1936 Dawson Predicts: Obama's Totalitarian State of Free Milk and Birth Control

In 1936 Christopher Dawson predicted Obama's totalitarian (Obamacare) state of free milk and birth control.

My question is if Romney was the forrunner (Romneycare) of totalitarian state of free milk and birth control, why should I trust or vote for him?

At this time, it is more important to witness to truth and pray. Jesus is saving us and may save this country, but only if get on our knees and ask.

Fred


-“It may be harder to resist a Totalitarian state which relies on free
milk and birth control clinics than one which relies on castor oil and
concentration camps.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/liberal-fascism/about/praise.p?page=13

Bradley Birzer’s book on Christopher Dawson: “Sanctifying the World”.

On p.124, Birzer discusses Dawson’s book, “Religion and the Modern
State” (1936):

Dawson “described the rise of fascism while labeling the rise of the
New Deal in America as a benign form of dictatorship. ‘It is in fact
a constitutional dictatorship,’ Dawson wrote bluntly. Further, he
noted, to abandon the free market, as the Americans had done, would
lead to the abandonment of other American liberties. ‘We shall also
have to abandon political individualism and the right to criticize and
oppose the Government,’ Dawson wrote. Rooted in the Burkean
tradition of organic common law and constitutional medievalism, Dawson
believed that all liberties were wrapped together, inseparable from
one another….mass democracies more often than not allow bureaucracies and selfish
interests to assume control, forcing all things to become political
and politicized…”

Check out this quote especially, which might have come from your own
pen:


“It may be harder to resist a Totalitarian state which relies on free
milk and birth control clinics than one which relies on castor oil and
concentration camps.”

Believing in wrecks as a matter of principle
Bruce W. Green - Guest Columnist - 4/3/2009 9:00:00 AM

I admit to being no more impressed these days with Republicans than with Democrats. Ideologies, like addictive drugs, seem to have disintegrated any trace of commendable statesmanship from the makeup of modern politicians.





It may be that America's leaders in recent years — the Republicans — allowed greed to flourish and mortgaged the nation's future at the expense of the common good, but, in the words of Christopher Dawson "[t]he fact that we have lost confidence in the ship's officers is no reason for entrusting its navigation to people who believe in wrecks as a matter of principle or who make a business of piracy." [1]

Whatever may have been the case with the former ship's officers, America now shows signs of embracing an imminent and superficially benign form of dictatorship. [2] The country's new administration is discarding the free market with shocking speed, assisting bureaucracies to assume control of private business, politicizing the economy, and facilitating the further breakdown of traditional morality. Soon, American culture may have changed in a fashion so drastic as to be no longer recognizable as American or cultured. And it will have done so, to all appearances, under a benevolent, benign dictatorship which, perhaps sincerely, believes in wrecks as a matter of principle.

Admittedly, the majority of American people seem not to protest too much about the evolving cradle-to-grave welfare state. As Dawson noted, however, "[i]t may be harder to resist a Totalitarian state which relies on free milk and birth-control clinics than one which relies on castor oil and concentration camps." [3] But, totalitarian results, however brought about, are ultimately dehumanizing.

Perhaps it must be candidly admitted that the country has begun an irreversible process of inevitable decay. In such an ideological context, it is easy for people of principle, and particularly people of Christian faith, to feel lost. But, what can be done?

First, we must be enduringly patient. It will take quite some time before most can see that the new order professes humanitarian principles while at the same time refusing to tolerate any true individuality or dissent from materialist ideals. We must resist the temptation to exchange one ideology for another, to grasp for quick cures, or to believe that our current decline may be remedied solely by political means. America is very ill; she is not just temporarily under the control of the wrong political ideology. It will take time, self-control, fortitude, and moral virtue to return to a higher form of government and civilization.

Second, we must do what is in our power to challenge the reigning system of values and to witness to truth in a culture approaching the final stages of dehumanization. Despite our natural tendency to recoil from dehumanizing influences, we must not withdraw from the time and place in which we have been born. We must not attempt to isolate ourselves from the unpleasantness of cultural decay by constructing a private world in harmony with our political, moral, or religious convictions. Witnessing to truth is the duty and burden of a free people.

Ordered liberty is our hope for the future. Liberty must be earned, and sometimes it must be re-earned. This begins with the revitalization of subsidiary institutions like the family, church, and local communities. These institutions humanize us and help us resist dehumanization. While we must never forget Washington, we must refuse to accept the idea that it is ultimate reality.



References:

[1] Christopher Dawson, "The Modern Dilemma," Cambridge Review, February 17, 1933, 10.
[2] In 1936 Dawson called Roosevelt's New Deal "a constitutional dictatorship", which he might find benign indeed when compared with its impending modern form. See Christopher Dawson, Religion and the Modern State (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1936), 23.
[3] Id., 108.






Bruce W. Green (bwg@consolidated.net) is an attorney in Texas and founding dean of the Liberty University School of Law. This column is printed with permission.



Opinions expressed in 'Perspectives' columns published by OneNewsNow.com are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network, OneNewsNow.com, our parent organization or its other affiliates

[http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=476454]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk

"The same Globalists who installed Biden... installed the Zelensky regime... [&] those who did not volunteer for this are Literal Human Shields for the Zelensky/Soros government... [if] Trump had survived the election coup in 2020 we would have no Ukraine war"

Above: Ukrainian President Zelensky (2nd from left) and three other men perform a homoerotic skit on Ukrainian television.    What is the Real Agenda of the corrupt Joe & Hunter Biden's Russiagate backing of the Trudeau-like Obama corrupt Ukraine Operatives in their Warmongering Posturing? "If President Trump had survived the election coup in 2020 we would have no Ukraine war (because he respects Russia’s legitimate security interests and wants to disband NATO)." - Scott Lively Constitutional lawyer Scott Lively thinks that the "same globalists who installed Biden... installed the Zelensky regime in Ukraine... [and] those who did not volunteer for this are literal human shields for the Zelensky/Soros government": The use of human shields in warfare of any kind is a horrifying satanic tactic, and, ironically, it is most effective against people who are truly humane. The tactic uses our humanity against us, because we don’t want the innocent t