Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from September 1, 2019

TnT Guest Co-Host Fr. Nix: "Bishop Gracida... is a Great Hero... for Questioning Valid Resignation of Pope Benedict... at least one other Cardinal... Questioning this, too."

Frequent guest co-host on Dr. Taylor Marshall's YouTube TnT show Fr. David Nix stated: "Bishop Gracida of Texas is a great hero of mine for publicly questioning the valid resignation of Pope Benedict. I know for a fact that at least one other Cardinal in the world is questioning this, too." (PadrePeregrino.org, "Courage over Consequentialism in the Hierarchy," March, 3, 2019) Pray an Our Father now that that cardinal receive the grace of courage to join Bishop René Gracida in calling for an cardinal investigation into the Pope Benedict resignation and the Francis conclave.

Was St. Bernard a "De Facto Schismatic" in not attending Anacletus II Masses since the Majority of Cardinals claimed he was the "True Pope" according to Taylor Marshall?

Dr. Taylor Marshall in his book "Infiltration" on page 239 wrote: "Catholics are obliged to attend only those Masses that commemorate the true pope... Any Mass that does not commemorate the true pope... is de facto schismatic." However, St. Bernard of Clairvaux did not attend only those Masses that commemorat[ed] the true pope [according to the majority of the cardinals of the time]... [Moreover,] [a]ny Mass that does not commemorate the true pope [according to the majority of cardinals of the time]... is de facto schismatic" apparently according to the reasoning of Marshall and that appears to be a problem for him. Does this mean that Doctor of the Church St. Bernard was "de facto" a "schismatic" according to Dr. Marshall? Since it appears to be a 100% belief beyond doubt of Marshall, similar to his Twitter collaborator One Peter Five's Steve Skojec, that Francis's papacy is valid beyond question and if anyone doubts it the

Infallibility: Is 1P5 Skojec a "Double Agent" who keeps Catholics "Confused... a Whining Bunch of Scandalmong[ers] rather than United in any Useful Purpose"?

- Vatican I expert Fr. Chad Ripperger, PhD, in his book "Magister Authority" shows that almost all Francis apologists be they liberal, conservative or traditionalist are "proximate to heresy": "[T]reating ALL papal statements as if they are infallible... is proximate to heresy because it rejects the precise formulation of the conditions of infallibility as laid out in Vatican I... by essentially saying the pope is infallible regardless of conditions..." "... Worse still, those who were to follow a pope who was in error in a non-infallible teaching which is taught contrary to something that is infallible is not, therefore, excused." (Magisterial Authority, Pages 5-14) - Pope Innocent III (1198-1216) in "Si Papa": "'Let no mortal being have the audacity to reprimand a Pope on account of faults, for he whose duty it is to judge all men cannot be judged by anybody, unless he should be called to the task of having deviated

Is 1P5 Skojec's Infallible Opinion that Francis's Papacy can't be Invalid leading him into Heresy?

It appears that One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec's infallible opinion that the Francis papacy cannot be invalid under any circumstances is leading him towards heresy. Yesterday on Twitter, Skojec said to @JoshuaPotryus and @MikeJon: "The problem is that infallibility appears to be tautological at best and borders on superstition at worst." A example of a tautology is former Vice President Dan Quayle's: "If we do not succeed, we run the risk of failure." A possible Skojec tautology might go: "If Francis is not a valid pope, we run the risk of Francis being a antipope" which may lead to this possible Skojec tautology: "I believe Vatican I's papal infallibly teaching "appears... [to border] on superstition," so I accept as true that that infallible dogma "appears... [to border]" on being a unfounded belief." It appears that Skojec's logic goes something like the following: &

Alone it is Bishop Gracida against Francis in the Greatest Church Crisis in History & the Historic Gracida Open Letter

We are in the greatest crisis in the history of the Church because Francis and his pro-gay bishops network who make the immoral Borgia popes and their inner circles look like choir boys are creating gay heretical cardinals in a attempt to make a permanent gay heretical church. As a priest recently said even if we can get the Church or state to remove all the bad men, Francis is only going to replace them with worse men. Of course, we must continue to work for the removal of Francis's immoral pro-gay bishops network, but the only way we are going to begin a real restoration of the Church is to remove Francis as well as all his controllers and collaborators. There is only one bishop in the Church actively working toward the removal of Francis. He is Bishop Rene Henry Gracida. Whether he acknowledges it or not, Bishop Gracida is our St. Athanasius. Athanasius virtually alone, except for the faithful laity, lead the resistance against the Arian heresy in the fourth century

Francis's New Cardinals: "Most [Heretical] Liberal group... EVER" & When does Cardinal Investigation into Francis Conclave Validity Begin?

Rorate Caeli's sources says Francis's newly about to be named cardinals are the "most liberal," which just means "most heretical," group of cardinals "ever assembled" with two being "widely known for their 'gay' preferences." Liberal defacto means heretical because it means they defacto support Communion for adulterers. (Rorate Caeli, "Francis Announces  Creation of 13 new Cardinals - 10 New Electors, Most Liberal Group Ever Assembled," No date given) It appears that this heretical "assembled" group is even more heretical than all the pseudocardinals created by all the antipopes in history. This unprecedented assembly of about to be created heretical Francis cardinals reminds one of the 8 pseudocardinals created by antipope Anacletus II. St. Bernard of Clairvaux investigated the validity of the supposed "Pope" Anacletus conclave and found his pontificate was not valid because he had violated t

Pope Innocent III: A Pope can be Judged for Heresy

Here is the answer from a POPE to all the Francis apologists who claim that a heretical pope can't be judged by the Church. This is especially for Dr. Taylor Marshall, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Steve Skojec, Mark Shea as well as all his Patheos collaborators and all the assorted liberal to conservative to traditionalist Francis apologists. Pope Innocent III (1198-1216) in "Si Papa": "'Let no mortal being have the audacity to reprimand a Pope on account of faults, for he whose duty it is to judge all men cannot be judged by anybody, unless he should be called to the task of having deviated from the faith. (Si Papa)'" "Pope Innocent III: 'For me the faith is so necessary that, whereas for other sins my only judge is God, for the slightest sin in the matter of the faith I could be judged by the Church.' (propter solum peccatum quod in fide commititur possem ab Ecclesia judican)" (The Remnant, "Answering a Sedevacantist Cr

Is Taylor Marshall "as much a Cafeteria Catholic as any Humane Vitae Denier"?

Today, veteran Catholic blog commenter  Justina  in the Catholic Monitor comment section said she thought that Dr. Taylor Marshall is "as much a cafeteria Catholic as any Humane Vitae denier": "Taylor Marshall 'knows' what he wants to know. He knows that staying away from the issue of Bergoglian legitimacy makes it safe--or perhaps, just safe enough--for him to go on riffing about everything else. What does that tell you about the situation in the Church today? Much like the stance of Michael Voris, I believe." "In a recent TnT video, Marshall mentions that Bishop Schneider is his current favorite. That fits, since Bishop Schneider has made himself the poster boy for the "do not diss Jorge himself, at all costs" approach which Marshall follows. Where was Bishop Schneider, for example, when the Dubia stood in need of additional signers?" " The problem here is that all truth is true. It's a package deal. If you don

Can Protestant Charismatic Deliverance and Spirituality be Dangerous for Catholics?

Former Satanist now Catholic Deborah Lipsky's book "A Message of Hope" says not to trust Protestant Charismatic deliverance because it could be dangerous. Brian Showalter in a review of the Lipsky book said: "Another former Satanist Deborah Lipsky has a similar story to Betty. She went to Catholic school where she got bullied for being autistic. She blamed the Catholic Church for her pain and her goal was to destroy the Catholic Church. She had made a pact with the devil and the demons she was associated with knew the Catholic Church was their nemesis. She says: 'I used to take pleasure bringing born-again Christians to their knees if they tried either 'exorcising' my demons or speaking to me of Jesus' love. Protestants of all denominations were also 'sport' as they quickly buckled under my power when they tried to convert me. However even back then I feared the Catholic priest as I knew, as did my demons, that I was no match for the po