Skip to main content

Sedeprivationism...References..."Is Mel Gibson a...Sedeprivationis[t]"

Sedeprivationism is a doctrinal position within Traditionalist Catholicism which holds that the current occupant of the Holy See is a duly-elected pope....

... References [edit]
  1. ^ "Who we are – Sodalitium". Retrieved 21 March 2021.
  2. Jump up to:a b c d "Is Mel Gibson a Sedevacantist? Sedevacantism verses Sedeprivationism"Taylor Marshall. 22 June 2008. Retrieved 11 May 2021.
  3. ^ Pasulka, Diana Walsh (2015). Heaven Can Wait: Purgatory in Catholic Devotional and Popular Culture. Oxford University Press. p. 180. ISBN 978-0-19-538202-0.
  4. Jump up to:a b True Restoration. Interview with Bishop Donald Sanborn, on Vatican II, the SSPX, and the Motu Proprio. Posted 11 February 2019.
  5. ^ "The Heresy of Sedeprivationism". www.geocities.ws. Retrieved 11 May 2021.
  6. ^ Guérard des Lauriers, M. L. (May 1979). "LE SIÈGE APOSTOLIQUE EST-IL VACANT? (LEX ORANDI, LEX CREDENDI)" [Is the Apostolic See Vacant? (Lex orandi, lex credendi)] (PDF). Cahiers de Cassiciacum: Études de sciences religieuses. 1. Association Saint-Herménégilde: 5–99.
  7. ^ "Notification". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  8. Jump up to:a b "The material Papacy – Sodalitium". Solidatium. Retrieved 11 May 2021.

    Through an impediment of the moral order, however, they cannot receive papal power who posit a certain moral obstacle, both voluntary and removable, for example, the refusal of episcopal consecration, or the intention of teaching errors or of promulgating harmful general disciplines, or the refusal of baptism in the case of the election of a catechumen (for example, St. Ambrose, elected to the episcopal see of Milan) These are capable of a valid designation because the impediment is removable, but the authority cannot be infused by God until the impediment is removed. The reason is that they are not capable of promoting the common good to the extent that they do not remove the obstacle. And because the impediment is moral and voluntary, the obstacle is reduced to an absence of the intention of promoting the common good. God, therefore, who is Subsistent Good, is not able to infuse power in him who posits a voluntary impediment toward the promotion of the common good.

  9. ^ Sanborn, Donald J. (29 June 2002). "Explanations of the Thesis of Bishop Guerard Des Lauriers" (PDF). Most Holy Trinity Seminary. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 July 2018. Retrieved 11 May 2021.

Comments