Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")
Deliverance Prayers II The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...
Comments
The pontificate of Pope Francis, if he recognizes himself as a legitimate Roman Pontiff, must have a definitive sentence on the part of the Church, according to St. Thomas Aquinas, in order to be pointed out as a heretic: "In fact, heretics, schismatics and excommunicated persons are deprived of the exercise of their powers by a sentence of the Church (Summa Theologiae, Tertia Pars, Quaestio 82, Articulus 9, co.)".
Therefore, if some believe that this Pope is a heretic, but is a Pope, then one must still expect such a sentence. Unfortunately, they must continue in due "obedience to the Roman Pontiff" (Code of Canon Law, 751). That is, they must abide, for example, to "Amoris Laetitia". No one has the authority to judge him or disobey him, for that would be an act of schism against a Pope. Because that would prove to be rebellion and an unchristian attitude.
But this also reveals another big problem. The Church has defined papal infallibility, a definitive dogma by Pope Pius IX, and if Bergoglio is sentenced as a stubborn heretic, this would obviously be contradictory to this dogma; The article, however, does not have this problematic possibility.
The solution to get out of these impasses, in what was defined by the Church, is in the Declaration of Benedict XVI. And Bergoglio does not have the munus (office) obviously. Therefore it should be noted that what is written in the "Universi Dominici Gregis", in its articles 76 and 77. Because these articles authorize Catholics not to obey this non-legitimate Pope, since it is said that it is not necessary for a sentence from the Church.
The problem itself is not heresies of this pontificate, but that this pontificate has never been legitimate from the beginning. The solution proposed by the article is inconsistent, as it should be logical. All possibilities must be coherent in the face of a legitimate and real good Christian conscience, because all this must be addressed so that there is coherence with the truth.