Skip to main content

@FeserEdward Whatever you think of his conclusions, no one can reasonably dismiss arguments grounded in scholarship of the kind Prof. Rist is well known for. This promises to be a book that will have to be engaged with seriously by Catholic thinkers of all stripes.


See new Tweets

Conversation

Ron Chandonia and Simon Platt liked
Edward Feser
@FeserEdward
Whatever you think of his conclusions, no one can reasonably dismiss arguments grounded in scholarship of the kind Prof. Rist is well known for. This promises to be a book that will have to be engaged with seriously by Catholic thinkers of all stripes.
jamesclarke.co
Infallibility, Integrity and Obedience: The Papacy and the Roman Catholic Church, 1848-2023 - James...
An excoriating study of the history of papal authority in the Roman Catholic Church since the late nineteenth century, and how it has led to the present doctrinal crisis.
1,685
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
The papacy isn’t the problem. The problem is that Freemasons infiltrated the Vatican last century and have surrounded the true popes. From their leadership positions, they have watered down what gets taught in seminaries and have caused multiple scandals which people blame VII for. Now they installed the false prophet, and every time he does something scandalous and evil, he pretends he does it in the name of VII, which did not teach error but logically developed doctrine. For example, VII did not teach communion in the hand and all the true popes treated it like an abuse. Their goals is to convince Catholics that Catholicism is a false religion. Another goal is to convince Christians that the antichrist is Jesus Christ when they make him emperor of the new world order. People do not distinguish between Vatican II and what modernists call “the spirit of Vatican II”. They canonize every pope since VII to convince people that the VII Church is a false church, while at the same time building the one world church on top of the counterfeit rock.
6:30 AM
Anonymous said…
Some say that Benedict XVI made a mistake in substance in the abdication, as required by canon 322.2. He was to abdicate the office, but he chose the ministry. But Benedict XVI's Normas Nonnullas on Some Modifications to the Universi Dominici Gregis, John Paul II's apostolic constitution, does not modify Article 77:

“I decree that the dispositions concerning everything that precedes the election of the Roman Pontiff and the carrying out of the election itself must be observed in full, even if the vacancy of the Apostolic See should occur as a result of the resignation of the Supreme Pontiff, in accordance with the provisions of Canon 333 § 2 of the Code of Canon Law and Canon 44 § 2 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches”.

It continues to be valid, therefore, as something providential. Because if we don't trust in divine providence, then we'll say it's failed us.

If we use this line of thought, then we will say that the divine inspiration to the last popes erred, through the drafting of the apostolic constitution.

You see, the gravity of such a thing. I could go deeper, but it's enough that it's all dark.

So there is evidence through various Latin scholars in Italy who say that Ratzinger was aware of what he was doing. And several other scholars from other fields as well.

We are in dark times against the Church. The Catholic cannot make himself partisan to Cionci or Minutella; He, however, must analyze everything around him. We, therefore, must opt for the good of the papacy and the Church allied to the truth.

Renato
1:12 PM
Anonymous said…
There is a typo about canon 332.2, in article 77 in the same constitution in the English language. In this translated language it says 333.2, not 332.2. I put it to check in Latin:

“77. Quae de actis electionem praecedentibus et de ipsa Romani Pontificis electione hactenus dicta sunt, ea omnia servanda esse declaramus, etiam si contingat vacationem Sedis Apostolicae per renuntiationem Summi Pontificis occurrere, secundum can. 332, § 2 « Codicis Iuris Canonici » et can. 44, § 2 « Codicis Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium ».

Renato
1:58 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...
3 comments
Read more

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...
96 comments
Read more

Has the Trad Media fallen into a COVID-like mass formation with "the Uncola or 'UnFrancis'" Leo XVI? While it's humorous to see the former anti-Francis Trad pundits suddenly acting like teen age girls infatuated with Leo, it could lead to a Trojan Horse effect

May 2023-Cardinal Robert Prevost Honorary Doctorate from the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo (USAT). Posted by Elizabeth Yore... ... Frankly, it’s shocking and inconceivable that a newly elected pontiff would cite as his guiding light the theology of Joseph Bernardin, a known sexual predator and radical collaborator of Marxist and community activist, Saul Alinsky... ... Bernardin and the Alinsky... gave birth to the moral relativism of Bernardin’s seamless garment religion, which is referenced in Prevost’s speech. Prevost espouses the “seamless garment” radical ideology of Cardinal Joseph Bernardin , former Archbishop of Chicago. It is long overdue that American Catholics wake up about the real Joseph Bernardin . [ https://www.yorechildren.com/blog/2025/5/20/the-chicago-way] It is difficult to capture all the arresting insights of Desmet’s rewarding book, which includes the startling claim that [COVID] tyrannical leaders are, very often,  themselves  captive t...
Post a Comment
Read more