Skip to main content

Nick Donnelly @ProtecttheFaith... Bergoglio is mocking Almighty God & laughing at faithful Catholics Bergoglio picks pro-abortion, pro-prostitution, pro-LGBT Argentinian Judge for Vatican Body @DrJulesGomes "Bergoglio has appointed...

Jorge Bergoglio is mocking Almighty God and laughing at faithful Catholics Bergoglio picks pro-abortion, pro-prostitution, pro-LGBT Argentinian Judge for Vatican Body "Bergoglio has appointed an Argentinian supreme judge as head of new institution for social doctrine. This guy is pro-abortion and pro-prostitution. He owned six flats in one street in Buenos Aires which were rented out as brothels. When it was discovered he denied it and his lawyer took the rap. Bergoglio is laughing at us" From source in Argentina churchmilitant.com/news/article/p
Image

Comments

Anonymous said…
Bergoglio and his allies have been promoting this circus since 2013. He appeared on the balcony in St. Peter's Square, without his papal robes, saying, "Good evening." And on this very balcony he did not have the coat of arms of his predecessor, according to tradition, because it was only a large blank cloth that night. Then everyone noticed that he was seen without the papal coat of arms on the Sash, in his white cassock, and without the red shoes. Therefore, from the year 2013 until today his acts are consistent with this whole circus. Probably, his Synodal Church, or simply Church "X" that recalls many brands of pornographic production that is consistent with Zaffaroni which has brothels and Fernández with kissing specialty, will be a target of divine fury soon. But we are Catholics and we must be compassionate. The great example left was Benedict XVI.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...