Skip to main content

@father_rmv "We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church & the anti-church, between the gospel & the anti-gospel, between Christ & the antichrist...." (Karol Cardinal Wojtyla, speaking at the Eucharistic Congress in Philadelphia, 1976)

Tweet

See new Tweets

Conversation

Father V
@father_rmv
"We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church and the anti-church, between the gospel and the anti-gospel, between Christ and the antichrist. The confrontation lies within the plans of Divine Providence. It is, therefore, in God's Plan, and it must be a trial which the Church must take up, and face courageously..." (Karol Cardinal Wojtyla, speaking at the Eucharistic Congress in Philadelphia, 1976)
Image
5,704
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
Bergoglio is not just another of 40 antipopes, if I am not mistaken, in the history of the Church. With plans for a "Synodal Church" soon and the appointment of a fully Gnostic prefect in the CDF, we can clearly see an imposture of a religion that exchanges truth through apostasy. In the catechism prepared by John Paul II, in article 675, it says:

"Before the coming of Christ, the Church must pass a final test that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies their pilgrimage on earth will reveal the 'mystery of iniquity' in the form of a religious imposture that offers men an apparent solution to their problems, at the price of apostasy from the truth. The greatest religious imposture is that of the Antichrist, that is, a pseudo-messianism in which man glorifies himself in the place of God and his Messiah comes in the flesh."

Renato
8:58 AM
Anonymous said…
The pectoral cross of Virctor Manuel Fernandéz is the same as that of Bergoglio. There is significance to this in showing that the right arm covers the left arm and demonstrates a connection to a secret society, according to Andrea Cionci. A few years ago, there was a website on the Internet, which now no longer exists, which also represents itself as a symbol of the "Gnostic Catholic Church".

https://www.opinion22.com.ar/nota.php?notaId=2442

Renato
11:23 AM
Anonymous said…
Correcting, the crossing of arms are contrary. And the correct name of the new mayor is Víctor Manuel Fernández.

Renato
11:34 AM
Anonymous said…
I’m learning some Canon Law. If Bergoglio really is the pope traditionalists have to give up the Latin Mass. Just calling him the pope but ignoring his rescripts is not an option. On the other hand, if he was never the pope, Bishops refusing to provide the Lating Mass are sinning. If he was never the pope Traditiones Custoded is null and void.
11:48 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more