Skip to main content

Nick Donnelly @ProtecttheFaith... St Athanasius... opposed the heretic Arius... If you are a clergyman... oppose the Bergoglian heresy... [or] you will be known as an appeaser... of the worst heresiarch in history


Nick Donnelly
@ProtecttheFaith
Do you think St Athanasius would be a saint if he hadn't opposed the heretic Arius? Do you think St. Thomas More would be a saint if he hadn't opposed the heresiarchs Luther & Henry VIII? If St. Athanasius had kept quiet about Arius being a heretic he would be seen by history as appeasing & enabling heresy. The same goes for St. Thomas More. If you are a clergyman or a leading lay person & you don't publicly oppose the Bergoglian heresy Not only will you not become a saint you will be known as an appeaser and enabler of the worst heresiarch in history
Image
Last edited
1,731
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
One side, we have a Bergoglio is not simply an antipope. His actions demonstrate that they will be consistent with a usurper because they are inspired by something unchristian. And we have on the other side a Benedict XVI who did not abdicate, because he only went out and kept the office to himself. He was the Vicar of Christ and a kind of Katejon until death. So we are seeing clearly the mystery of iniquity that will impose on every society in the four corners of the earth something tyrannical and unchristian; Our spiritual life, therefore, should not be consistent with all this if we approach each other at the communion table. It is a duty of conscience to analyze oneself as we are receiving the species of bread and consecrated wine I am not a priest nor do I have the authority to demand anything from anyone. But we are obliged to recognize this, for the facts say for themselves that there is a Church and an Anti-Church. And in practice it is to be in communion with what is true and integrated, with maturity, without attachments to ourselves; we turned with body and soul only in the will of God. As Sister Lucia says, we are in the time that we must seriously decide: either we are with God or with the Devil. Therefore, there is a heroic need to confess, on the rooftops, which compels us to proclaim which side we are on.

Renato
12:45 PM
Anonymous said…
Their actions demonstrate that they will be consistent and worse than a usurper. It's more correct that way. It is necessary for us to have the virtue of hope, something that perhaps should be recorded above as well.

Renato
3:22 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more