Skip to main content

NewsMax Flashback: Public Schools Unsafe at Any Price: German Style

https://www.newsmax.com/pre-2008/public-schools-unsafe-any/2002/04/30/id/666547/

Public Schools Unsafe at Any Price: German Style | Newsmax.com


By Fred Martinez

The nightmares at Columbine and Santana high schools in the United States, along with the new Columbine-like tragedy in Germany, may mark a turning point, as did the John F. Kennedy assassination.

The assassination, however, prolonged a myth while the school massacres may be ending one.

The lie of the Kennedys' perfect presidential family – which the assassination prolonged – ushered in the sexual revolution, whereas the ending of Clinton's lying presidential family coincided with the end of the myth of "the good American education."

Maybe with the German tragedy, Europe will realize that the good American public education model is a lie.

Market researcher C. Britt Beemer thinks the "Columbine factor" has changed our country's mindset. His surveys show that 70 percent of parents now think danger in schools will continue to increase. "Informed parents" are also dissatisfied with the drugs, peer pressure and poor teaching in public schools.

Beemer sees a trend toward single-income families, with one parent working and one parent homeschooling the kids.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.

After 50 years of feminist propaganda, parents appear to be realizing that children are smarter and healthier when they spend more time with them.

After 150 years of education propaganda, parents are beginning to see public schools as unfit for the moral and intellectual development of their kids, in addition to being unsafe.

John Taylor Gatto, former New York City and State Teacher of the Year, documents how the education system purposely has created a mass of illiterates.

Gatto's book, "The Underground History of American Education," demonstrates that in 1840 – before public education – 93 percent to 100 percent of both poor and rich had "complex literacy."

But since "compulsory" schools began, each succeeding generation has become more illiterate. After World War II – with increased funding to public schools – black illiteracy doubled and white illiteracy quadrupled.

Please note: The increased funding to public schools was followed by "dumbing down," which was followed by violence.

Justice Department records show that violent criminals are overwhelmingly (80 percent) illiterate. As illiteracy increased after World War II, so did crime, out-of-wedlock births quadrupled, and in the '60s "bizarre violence ... became common."

Gatto documents that throwing money at education is a waste unless certain instituted changes are reversed. The first "well-documented" change to produce illiteracy was the American schools' massive conversion to "non-phonetic ways of teaching reading."

Then the '60s began the schools' replacement of morality and discipline with reinforcement schedules. There was no right or wrong, only the sterile therapeutic concepts of "positive and negative reinforcement" to maintain the "social order."

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why "bizarre violence ... became common" in the '60s.

As the bizarre psychology of "planned smiles," "stern looks," "self-esteem" and "aggression management" replaced the Ten Commandments, school security guards and metal detectors became a growth industry.

And teachers who were true educators, like Jaime Escalante of "Stand and Deliver" fame and teachers of the year like John Gatto, were weeded out. (Look these two educators up on the Internet – they were both forced out.) We all can remember two or three good teachers like Escalante and Gatto, but they were the exceptions, not the rule.

If it is true, as Gatto with overwhelming evidence shows in his book, that the education system is purposely creating a mass of illiterates; and if it is true, as the Justice Department shows, that violent criminals are overwhelmingly illiterate, then the education system in our American-copying global culture will be unsafe at any price.

Fred Martinez is staff religion editor of the Conservative Monitor, winner of the CatholiCity Frequent Flyer award, and a regular contributor to the San Francisco Faith, a Northern California newspaper. Specializing in religious as well as psychological articles, he has published in diverse publications ranging from The British Psychological Society's Psycho Net-UK to the New Australian. In addition, he wrote for, produced and hosted the "Latino Love Show" on Channel 38, San Francisco.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...