The Anti-Benedict XVI Salza Controlled & Censoring Remnant & 1P5 have been Proven Wrong by Bishop Gracida
Is Pope Francis a heretic? | EPHESIANS ...
- LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial
weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples
facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of
Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"
- On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia
has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."
- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the
Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters
magisterial documents."
“'[T]he fact that Bergoglio is indisputably a public heretic has been Father Kramer’s major reason for rejecting the current 'pontificate'. The other idea of some mafias wanting to force Benedict XVI to resign is simply not a fiction as well.'" - Jonathan Ekene Ifeanyi [http://traditionalcatholicisminnigeria.blogspot.com/2017/06/why-does-father-paul-kramer-still.html?m=1]
"Salza shamelessly defends the indefensible, falsely accusing (or deliberately making it appear that he is accusing) Pope Benedict of the dolus of formal heresy while exonerating the heretic Bergoglio, who says Christ's command to teach and convert the whole world is to the faith is venom... Bergoglio with persistent and obstinacy flatly denies and EXPLICITLY rejects this universally professed dogma of faith." - Fr. Paul Kramer (On the True and the False Pope: The Case against Bergoglio, Page 326)
"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." - Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
"Salza & Siscoe play on the fear of ordinary Catholics by conjuring up the spectre of sedevacantism... so that they can demonize any argument, idea or person...
... Salza & Siscoe, rigorously follow Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals." - Paul Kramer (On the True and the False Pope: The Case against Bergoglio, Page 334)
"I will never forget the wild rejoicing from all the Modernists and impure clergy round the world, on Feb. 11, 2013. I was at Rome and I saw that from that day onward the Pontifical Faculties began to throw off any pretense of the Faith. They were gleeful. They knew what happened and they lied to us each day to distract us from the truth of it or prevent us from every knowing it." - Br. Alexis Bugnolo [https://www.fromrome.info/2022/08/08/the-latest-work-around-for-canon-332-%c2%a72-the-liturgical-theory/]
The censoring Remnant and One Peter Five because of their blind acceptance of John Salza's "universal acceptance" theory are not allowing free debate and argument on the validity of the papacy of Francis in their publications.
The Salza theory was proven wrong by Bishop Rene Gracida who would have had to have been part of the so-called "universal acceptance" of Francis:
https://abyssum.org/2019/03/23/why-do-intelligent-men-pursue-the-application-of-an-obsolete-concept-universal-acceptance-to-the-problem-of-the-invalidity-of-the-papacy-of-francis-the-merciful-in-this-day-and-age-of-instant-elec/
WHY
DO INTELLIGENT MEN PURSUE THE APPLICATION OF AN OBSOLETE CONCEPT
“UNIVERSAL ACCEPTANCE” TO THE PROBLEM OF THE INVALIDITY OF THE PAPACY OF
FRANCIS THE MERCIFUL IN THIS DAY AND AGE OF INSTANT ELECTRONIC
COMMUNICATION AROUND THE WORLD
I am in receipt of an email from Steve Skojec, publisher of the website
OnePeterFive in which he defends his posts in which he argues for the
validity of the election of Francis the Merciful on the basis of the
“universal acceptance” of Francis’ election by the world’s Catholic
population.
The idea of “universal acceptance” of the election of popes of the past
may have had it’s origin in the first centuries of the Church when popes
were chosen by acclamation of the assembled citizens of Rome, and
perhaps later when the princes and kings of Europe decided on the
legitimacy of papal contestants in the time of the Avignon captivity of
the papacy.
But the idea of “universal acceptance” as the principle determining the
validity of Francis’ claim to the Chair of Peter is absurd in this day
of instant electronic communication. There is not a world-wide Pew or
Gallup poll that can determine the degree of “acceptance” of the
Bergolian regime as valid by the world’s Catholic population.
From the moment that Francis appeared on the balcony of St. Peter’s
Basilica improperly dressed and accompanied by men of known or suspected
homosexual orientation many Catholics besides myself were shocked and
dismayed.
Almost immediately almost every word publicly uttered by Francis shocked
Catholic sensibilities, such as telling the woman with several children
to “stop breeding like rabbits.” Many Catholics withheld their
“acceptance” and adopted a wait-and-see attitude.
Then the Amoris Laeticia debacle unfolded and now an even larger
percentage of Catholic around the world began to express reservations
about the ‘papacy’ of Francis the Merciful. There was never universal
acceptance of the validity of Jorge Bergoglio.
One thing is certain, the popes of the Twentieth Century were aware that
the election of future popes was now no longer subject to the
interference of kings and princes as in the past, now the corruption of
the democratic processes for choosing the heads of nations was
threatening the papal conclaves of the Church. Pope Paul VI, perhaps
alarmed by the forces for radical reform of the Church follow the lead
of his recent predecessor and published a revision of the Apostolic
Constitution which governs papal conclaves.
It is unthinkable that Pope Saint John Paul II was unaware of the
plotting that began with the St. Gallen Mafia in the early 1990s.
His magnificent Apostolic Constituion, Universi Dominci Gregis, was his
prescient action to head off the corruption of the conclaves of the
future. Yet, the rot at the center of the hierarchy had progress to
such point that Jorge Bergoglio was almost elected instead of Joseph
Ratzinger, but the St. Gallen conspirators succeed in 2013 with the
election of Francis the Merciful.
What is the sure test of the validity of the election of a cardinal to
the papacy? It is not the medieval concept of ‘universal acceptance.’
It is compliance with the law of the Church. The Apostolic Constitution
Universi Dominici Gregis is the only law in effect since it was
published by Pope Saint John Paul II in 1992.
If there is one characteristic that is common to the leadership of the
Church since the Second Vatican Council is disregard for law, all law,
divine law and canon law. Men who would be architects of the Church of
the Future ignore the law of God and the law of His Church. That is why
some cling to the outmoded concept of ‘universal acceptance’ of a man
who obtained the Chair of Peter through the manipulations of many who by
their immoral lives reveal their contempt for law, all law, including
Divine Law.
His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, having known a prodigious amount of information on this, was fully knowledgeable in the details of dogmatic and doctrinal principles which previous to his Apostolic Constitution, Universi Dominici Gregis, could and would be applied to resolve questions about the validity of a particular historic Papacy, and that His Holiness categorically and specifically intended to dispense with, and utterly to preempt, the need for, and use of, any principles which had been applied historically to resolve ambiguities and doubts about the incumbency of any Pontiff putatively emerging from a Conclave to which His Apostolic Constitution, Universi Dominici Gregis applied.
This means that because the status of Monsignor Bergoglio can be determined completely by a fair and just application of Universi Dominici Gregis without reference to any guidance external or extrinsic to such Constitution, having recourse to such historic doctrinal and dogmatic concepts, e.g., universal acceptance, is neither material nor relevant, and never necessary or proper for the rational discernment of the question of whether or not Monsignor Bergoglio was validly elected as a true Roman Pontiff. The “scienter” Promulgation determines this certainty of discernment confined within the “four corners” of the Constitution:
“This Constitution ... is to be fully and integrally implemented and is to serve as a guide for all to whom it refers. As determined above, I hereby declare abrogated all Constitutions and Orders issued in this regard by the Roman Pontiffs, and at the same time I declare completely null and void anything done by any person, whatever his authority, knowingly or unknowingly, in any way contrary to this Constitution.”[Promulgation
Clause, Apostolic Constitution, Universi Dominici Gregis]
This language does not admit of any exception, and certainly not an exception based on the degree to which a putative Pope has “acceptance” as such. “Universal acceptance” originated in an age before the printing press, a time when what was required was known by few and what was performed was understood by even less. It simply has no place in discerning a Conclave called subject to Universi Dominici Gregis. What Skojec, does not seem to understand is that, long in advance and lawfully, His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, has forbidden anyone from resorting to “universal acceptance”
or any other principle extrinsic to Universi Dominici Gregis to discern the outcome of papal election.
Thus, His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, having known a prodigious amount of information on this, was fully knowledgeable in the details of dogmatic and doctrinal principles which previous to his Apostolic Constitution, Universi Dominici Gregis, could and would be applied to resolve questions about the validity of a particular historic Papacy, and His Holiness categorically and specifically intended to dispense with, and utterly to preempt, the need for, and use of, any such principles which had been applied historically to resolve ambiguities and doubts about the incumbency of any Pontiff putatively emerging from a Conclave to which His Apostolic Constitution, Universi Dominici Gregis applied.
This means that because the status of Monsignor Bergoglio can be determined completely by a fair and just application of Universi Dominici Gregis without reference to any guidance external or extrinsic to such Constitution, having recourse to any such historic doctrinal and dogmatic concept, e.g., universal acceptance, is neither material nor relevant, and never necessary or proper for the rational discernment of the question of whether or not Monsignor Bergoglio was validly elected as a true Roman Pontiff. The “scienter” Promulgation determines this certainty of discernment confined within the “four corners” of the Constitution:
“This Constitution . . . is to be fully and integrally implemented and is to serve as a guide for all to whom it refers. As determined above, I hereby declare abrogated all Constitutions and Orders issued in this regard by the Roman Pontiffs, and at the same time I declare completely null and void anything done by any person, whatever his authority, knowingly or unknowingly, in any way contrary to this Constitution.” [Promulgation
Clause, Apostolic Constitution, Universi Dominici Gregis]
This language does not admit of any exception, and certainly not an exception based on the degree to which a putative Pope has “acceptance” as such. “Universal acceptance” originated in an age before the printing press, a time when what was required was known by few and what was performed was understood by even less. It simply has no place in discerning a Conclave called subject to Universi Dominici Gregis.
Some do not seem to understand that, long in advance and lawfully, His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, has forbidden and anyone from resorting to “universal acceptance”
or any other principle extrinsic to Universi Dominici Gregis in order to discern the outcome.
[https://abyssum.org/2019/03/23/why-do-intelligent-men-pursue-the-application-of-an-obsolete-concept-universal-acceptance-to-the-problem-of-the-invalidity-of-the-papacy-of-francis-the-merciful-in-this-day-and-age-of-instant-elec/]